This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

India: Cinema List‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles List This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). Business List‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles List This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Film: Indian List‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles List This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force. Lists List‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles List This article has been rated as List-class on the project's quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kottigobba 2 collection according to its Wikipedia page is 102 - 104 cr Chiranth01 (talk) 04:15, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiranth01: Well that's just clearly nonsense, isn't it? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:24, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Villain kannada movie not even collected 50cr..its flop for distribution.. How you added 123cr..non of the kannada movie crossed 100cr collection.. Present industry hit rajakumara Nithin1111 (talk) 10:40, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.filmibeat.com/kannada/news/2018/the-villain-box-office-collections-update-how-much-has-sudeep-shivarajkumar-film-collected/articlecontent-pf268932-279124.html please refer to this villain has collected 123 crore please update the list SUHAS JAYANNA (talk) 19:15, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sarkar - 300 Crores — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vijaymessi (talk • contribs) 09:23, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Need references. Rajan51 (talk) 10:47, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is a Telugu film which was actually made in both Telugu and dubbed Tamil at the same time. It is not Bollywood. Source: [1] Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 11:14, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Siddiqsazzad001: And where was it decided that each of those sections would only represent money made by an ethnic industry? Were you a part of that conversation? Because if not, you need to change that back and let the discussion actually take place. And for your edification: this RfC. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:16, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bahubali is telugu based. All this while bahubali was not featuring in tamil list. Now it is reflecting in tamil language. In that case 2.0 should be featuring in tollywood (telugu) as well. Same like bahubali 2.0 is done Kbwiki18 (talk) 16:55, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Change the collection of tamil movie 2.0 from 200 crores WW to 290 crores WW as reported by Mr. Ramesh Bala,trade analyst earlier this hour."

references- "https://twitter.com/rameshlaus/status/1069197638589763584."
Purnachandrashekarv (talk) 12:36, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Twitter is not a reliable source as twitter users self-publish the content in it, thus self-published. For this reason it can be considered that you have not provided any reliable sources with your requested change, since the Twitter link was the only thing that you have provided in your request. Please find another link that leads to a reliable source, and create another request with that reliable source. Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold (talk) 04:04, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Baahubali 2: The Conclusion and Baahubali: The Beginning are not listed under the Tamil language films, despite being bilinguals. Please list them using the #key which indicates their bilingual status. Sources for gross are present in the first subsection, and also in Telugu subsection. RajFilmBuff (talk) 06:42, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. DBigXrayᗙ 06:45, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DBigXray: The gross is right in this article and sourced (see #2 and #6 here); here are sources identifying the language: The Indian Express and the Hindu state it is a bilingual. However, our article does not list both films in Tamil language. The note signifies gross is to be taken for all languages together and there was consensus for it in 2015. For further input, see this RfC. Please restore to stable version. RajFilmBuff (talk) 11:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Note: DBigXray I'm gonna review this since it does seem these films were included in the Tamil section but removed without consenus at some point. The sources in the article do list these two films as being bilingual and there was a previous RfC on the matter that was closed with the consensus that these two films should be in the Tamil section. Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 16:07, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, User:Alucard 16 in light of the new information and the refs, please proceed, I note that I have no concerns in adding what has been requested. regards. --DBigXrayᗙ 16:14, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah so after looking at the revision history here is the issue. As of the revision on 08:42, November 29, 2018 @Sakthi1101: removed these two films from the Tamli section against established consensus. This has started a chain reaction of editors adding/removing the two titles from the section in question. Here is a small list of diffs in relation to the issue:

• 11:08, November 30, 2018 Sexymoosa123 adds them back.
• 08:23, December 1, 2018 Sakthi1101 removes them, this time with no edit summary.
• 09:39, December 1, 2018 Cyphoidbomb reverts Sakthi1101's previous edit directing user to article talk page in edit summary.
• 06:10, December 2, 2018 Siddiqsazzad001 reverts Cyphoidbomb stating "Baahubali is a Tollywood film not Kollywood film. SeeTalk Page".

I double checked the talk page archives seven - twelve to see if a difference consensus had been reached overriding the previous RfC found in Archive 6 and there hasn't been. Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 16:36, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I added the two films back into the article as per the standing community consensus found here and according to the sources in the article. Editors @Sakthi1101 and Siddiqsazzad001: please do not revert these changes or remove them from the Tamil section without a proper and thorough discussion to achieve a consensus on the matter. Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 16:36, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Alucard 16: Great due diligence on your part! Thanks for that. @Siddiqsazzad001: It's pretty irritating that although I left you a note on your talk page and on this talk page above, and directly educated you about the lack of consensus for the change, you did not revert your erroneous edit. As a result of that, look at the extra work that other people had to do above. Totally pointless, especially when common sense should have told you that since we've organised the contents of this article under "Highest-grossing films by language" not "Highest-grossing films by language industry" there might be some mixing of information, not ethnic absolutism. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:50, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb: Oh! Sorry for delay. I was so busy. Thank You for clarify me. Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 17:12, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yugesh kanniah: I just left a notice on your talk page but I'm pinging you here to read this discussion since you just tried to remove these films from the Tamil section. Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 17:46, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For the section "Highest-grossing opening weekends", need to add 2.0 movie at 2nd in the list. reference is available at [40] Archat (talk) 11:22, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 15:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The amount shown in the reference above for 2.0 is for the first week and not the opening weekend. Please change it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manni1230 (talk • contribs) 00:48, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The producers Lyca Productions tweeted that it made 400 crores in the first extended weekend https://mobile.twitter.com/LycaProductions/status/1069495399893762048 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manni1230 (talk • contribs) 01:06, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bahubali 2 is a telugu movie dont consider in tamil movies. If you consider bilingual then 2.0 is trilingual add it in telugu and hindi movie section too — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sakthi1101 (talk • contribs) 16:49, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sakthi1101: You're bringing up an ancient argument about Baahubali that was resolved through extensive discussion years ago. The list is organised under "Highest-grossing films by language" not "language industry". As for 2.0, it's still unclear to me whether it was shot in three languages. There was some early speculation about this in the media, but it's not been made clear if it was actually shot in three languages. Obviously we wouldn't consider dubs. If it has been shot in three languages, then yes, for consistency the information should be moved into the relevant tables. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:56, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be the first to admit I don't know much about the Indian film industry my primary focus would be the American film industry aka Hollywood since I'm from the United States however when it comes to reviewing edit requests for all articles I can't go against an established consensus and reliable sources. When it comes to films like Baahubali 2: The Conclusion its pretty hard not to include it in the Tamil section when you have a reliable source that clearly says "Baahubali is a bilingual project made in Tamil and Telugu." The same source also makes a clear distinction that the Hindi version was dubbed (which is why these films are not in the Hindi section.) From what I can find about 2.0 this source says that film was dubbed in Telugu which would explain why its not included in the Telugu list. If your wanting to remove Baahubali: The Beginning and Baahubali 2: The Conclusion from the Tamil list then find reliable sources that states it was dubbed in Tamil to support your case in a discussion to change the consensus. If you want 2.0 in the Telugu section then find reliable sources saying it is a bilingual project. Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 17:22, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bahubali is not bilingual. Bahubali 1 released in 2015 and 2 in 2017. All of a sudden it is included in tamil list in this week (dec 18). Intentions are clearly visible Kbwiki18 (talk) 16:59, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have conflict regarding Bahubali 2 which is updated in both telugu and tamil. Actual bahubali 2 tamil collection is 300 crores. Rest of 1500 crore in other languages. Including bahubali 2 in both tamil and telugu brings conflict that it has earned 1800 crore in both the languages. @ Cyphoidbomb if you are updating based on languages , not by industries. then include earnings only in that language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sakthi1101 (talk • contribs) 17:12, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the way this article is structured in the Highest-grossing films by language section there is a note that shades the "Worldwide gross" of the film letting the reader know that the film is bilingual and the worldwide gross is total amount the film has collected. This does not imply the film made the same amount in each language. The breakdown about the film has earned per language would be great information to add to the article of the film with a reliable source. Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 17:39, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sakthi1101: Please don't create a new discussion every time you want to reply. Just comment below like Alucard and I have done. In response to your latest proposal, it is an interesting idea and I'd be curious what other members of WP:ICTF thought of it. My main concern is that there might be insufficient references to sustain this type of information consistently, since there is an increasing trend of shooting films in multiple languages. If 2.0 is a multilingual film (I still don't know if it is) then where are we going to find a source that breaks down gross by language? We already have problems with the Indian film analysts' poor reporting. Also, if (as you say) the rest of the 1500 Baahubali 2 gross is other languages, are you proposing that we'd have to subtract the gross values of those dubs? Would we also have to know whether the dubs were based on the Tamil or Telugu version before making such a subtraction? Seems potentially very complicated. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Villain movie starring Shivaraj kumar and Kiccha sudeepa has become the highest grossing kannada movie with 123 crore rupees world wide gross , so please update the list SUHAS JAYANNA (talk) 19:07, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The villain movie to cross 100 cr in 15 days please update Chiranth01 (talk) 18:38, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The villain makers have claimed 60cr ww in first week Chiranth01 (talk) 18:40, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://mtwiki.blogspot.com/2018/10/top-10-highest-grossing-kannada-movies-of-all-time-by-worldwide-box-office-collection.html?m=1 Even according to this website the villain collection is 123crs make the necessary changes Chiranth01 (talk) 18:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://movie-rater.com/the-villain-movie-review-and-box-office-collections-hit-or-flop.html in this website the first 17 days of the villain is given in detailed that is 109crs . Make the changes the villain Kannada top grosser Chiranth01 (talk) 12:48, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiranth01: You do realise that anybody can start a blog and publish whatever nonsense they want, right? We don't use blogs or other random websites as sources. Find a major mainstream publication that agrees with the claim you are making. That means a major news website, for instance. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.filmibeat.com/kannada/news/2018/the-villain-box-office-collections-update-how-much-has-sudeep-shivarajkumar-film-collected/articlecontent-pf268932-279124.html Please refer to the link. The villain movie has collected gross 123 cr ra worldwide SUHAS JAYANNA (talk) 19:10, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SUHAS JAYANNA: Filmibeat is not considered a reliable source for financial data. See WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:03, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Film beat is not a official source of box office report and the movie can't gross 123crores with mixed WOM in karnataka we don't have that much screens With 450-500 screens a movie can't gross 123 crores In TN with 700-800 screens sarkar only grossed 126crore in TN box office, i repeat "126 crores in TN box office"(250cr WW gross) Please change the data Rakesh Kalaghatagi (talk) 11:45, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://mtwiki.blogspot.com/2018/10/top-10-highest-grossing-kannada-movies-of-all-time-by-worldwide-box-office-collection.html?m=1 Even according to this website the villain collection is 123crs Chiranth01 (talk) 18:51, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2.0(623 cr) has crossed sanju's lifetime collection (586 cr) ..but still not updated in Wikipedia page Harin0905 (talk) 09:48, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 12:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the year-wise conversion in Malayalam table. Someone added it recently. It's inconsistent with other tables. 137.97.84.63 (talk) 07:39, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As per the report mentioned above, Kayamkulam Kochunni made it into the 100 crore club https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/malayalam/nivin-pauly-kayamkulam-kochunni-makes-rs-100-crore-club-5473161/

And as per this report Odiyan has reached 83Crores https://thenewsrecorder.in/odiyan-box-office-collection-day-9/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.110.124.134 (talk) 15:25, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thenewsrecorder.in, a blog, is not a reliable source. Further the source of the 100 crore claim for Kayamkulam Kochunni is Nivin Pauly, and we should always be circumspect about the figures producers/directors/actors toss around about their own films, since they have an incentive to inflate. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:56, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KGF chapter 1 has reached 37.21 crores in 2 days. why are you reverting my edits? i have given the reliable source Indian express, what's wrong with you, who will get an interest to contribute to wikipedia if you keep on removing whatever edits they have done, atleast refer to the soures.

refer this - https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/regional/yash-kgf-box-office-collection-day-2-5505351/

https://www.businesstoday.in/trending/box-office/kgf-box-office-collection-day-2-yash-movie-becomes-fastest-kannada-movie-to-cross-200k-in-us/story/303548.html https://www.ibtimes.co.in/kgf-vs-zero-box-office-collection-rocking-star-yashs-film-overpowers-shah-rukh-khan-starrer-day-2-788576

ive given you 3 sources which you have mentioned as reliable sources, if you can add KGF chapter 1 highest grossing Kannada, or else leave it , i dont want to waste my time on editting in future, when it will be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SUHAS JAYANNA (talk • contribs) 04:59, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SUHAS JAYANNA: When I last reverted you, I included an edit summary to help you understand what the problem was. I wrote "Try again. You've mucked up the table." Your edits botched the formatting of the Kannada table. In your change, you randomly wedged a #4 spot into a fairly complicated table. Raajakumara should be in the #1 spot. Then there are three films in the 2, 3, 4 spot, because there are three films that grossed 50 crore. Doddmane Hudga, Krantiveera Sangolli Rayanna, and Uppi 2 grossed 40 crore, so they should be in the 5, 6, and 7 spots, followed by Kottigobba 2 in the #8 spot, and Dandupalya and Shivalinga in the #9 and 10 spots. If KGF made the list and if you can prove that, you need to be able to insert the information into that list so that it doesn't mess the rest of the table up. Hint: KGF would go in the #8 slot, Kottigobba 2 would become #9, and Dandupalya and Shivalinga would share a cell at #10/11. Got it? If you don't think you can do this without messing up the table, then ask for help. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:59, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The movie data is locked at column title section please change it Rakesh Kalaghatagi (talk) 11:03, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KGF chapter 1 has crossed 80 crore gross on Day - https://www.ibtimes.co.in/kgf-4-day-box-office-collection-yash-movie-crosses-rs-80-crore-mark-india-monday-788669 refer the link, it is from ibtimes, one of the reliable source as per your guide lines. Update the Kannada list, it becomes a highest grossing kannada movie by beating RAAJAKUMARA — Preceding unsigned comment added by SUHAS JAYANNA (talk • contribs) 07:12, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

520 crores is the 1st week gross of 2.0 and not 1st weekend gross according to the source provided in the link, https://www.zeebiz.com/india/photo-gallery-20-box-office-collection-day-7-india-wordwide-south-total-tamil-rs-520-crore-record-blockbuster-rajinikanth-akshay-kumar-74576. The source clearly mentions that the movie has entered the second week and date of publication of the source is one week after the release of the movie. So, please alter the list.

The third slide of the source shows that "2.0 Box Office Collection: Film and trade analyst Ramesh Bala made a startling claim by saying that the film has entered into Rs 500 crore club in the first week itself. "#2Point0 1st week WW BO: Gross: #India - Rs 392 Crs, Overseas - Rs 128 Crs, Total - Rs 520 Crs," said Bala in a tweet". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhuvannalla (talk • contribs) 10:38, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It collected 400 crores in 1st or opening weekend, here is the source https://www.hindustantimes.com/bollywood/2-0-day-4-box-office-akshay-kumar-rajinikanth-film-earns-a-mammoth-rs-400-cr-worldwide-rs-100-cr-in-hindi/story-RAGVN9StHhBxdj9Cl2BpVN.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhuvannalla (talk • contribs) 10:46, 26 December 2018 (UTC) 400 crores is domestic weekend gross — Preceding unsigned comment added by Govindkrishna29 (talk • contribs) 05:14, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Govindkrishna29, which source you are referring to. The provided source itself mentions that "#2Point0 1st week WW BO: Gross: #India - Rs 392 Crs". If the first week domestic gross itself is 392 crores, then how will the first weekend domestic gross becomes 400 crore?

The other source clearly mentions that the worldwide first weekend gross is 400 crores. Rs 520 Crs is first week gross and not first weekend gross.

The great father has collected 75cr from box office. Why it is not included?? Mathewav7 (talk) 15:26, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. From where, Mars ? Per gross collections compiled by trade sources from tracked centres in Kerala, the film not even have grossed anywhere near 50 crore.--137.97.187.229 (talk) 05:10, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2.0 had grossed 834 crores at WW box office, I have reliable sources govind krishna 05:11, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:16, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]