Archives

User talk:ShakespeareFan00/Archive1 User talk:ShakespeareFan00/Archive2 User talk:ShakespeareFan00/Archive3 User talk:ShakespeareFan00/Archive 4 User talk:ShakespeareFan00/Archive5 User talk:ShakespeareFan00/Archive6 User talk:ShakespeareFan00/Archive7User talk:ShakespeareFan00/Archive8User talk:ShakespeareFan00/Archive 9User talk:ShakespeareFan00/Archive10

It is new research. It would be very good to publish it on wikiversity, although I don't really know how to do it.

The papers I reference are not Open Access.

Olavo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olavolsf (talk • contribs) 09:10, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ShakespeareFan00. You have new messages at Banaticus's talk page.
Message added 13:25, 26 September 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

== Review of file File:Drake Jensen NAC.jpg ==

Hello ShakespeareFan00,

The aforementioned media mention for a source: "I took this photo at Drake Jensen's Christmas show in December 2012". So, how is it possible that the exact same picture has been used in a magazine in April 2012? See for yourself here.

Can Eagle65ca explain this? I will ask for this file to be deleted on Wikimedia Commons immediately.

I don't know how you operate on enwiki for this types of matter, but I guess that the user should be warned for this kind of behavior. I leave it under your hands.

Best regards,

--AntonierCH (talk) 20:57, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If it's copyvio on Commons, then it should also be CSD's as F9 here. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:59, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The note in the file's metadata is a type. It was 2011, not 2012. I also provided the photo to Wayves Magazine, specifically to the author of the article, Mr Randall Perry. I can put you in touch with him, or you may look him up directly, for confirmation. I can also provide proof that the NAC show was in fact December 2011, by providing copies of contracts and correspondence. Therefore, it is not a copyright violation since, as I've stated, I took the photo myself. I own the copyright. Eagle65ca (talk) 15:47, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i got a message saying that you requested the file "Rear view of the Kedarnath Temple.jpg" for speedy deletion. Please tell me the reason for this request. I don't find any reasons for deletion. Please go through the image description. Kiranmadhu.e (talk) 12:22, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sad to see you leaving, but thanks for all the good work that you've done to help Wikipedia.

ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 16:36, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Someone higher up then my level, verified that creator and the current copyright owner both have released the files for wikipedia according to the requirements. I am afraid I do not have a record of that action, but I could dig up the original release e-mails that satisfied whoever restored the photos and modified file, if you are concerned. Otherwise, please remove the alerts on the photo file please. Smallshrine (talk)Smallshrine 05:26, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am pleased that you were able to find the original release e-mails, but it would be helpful if you could indicate the specific image concerned.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 06:50, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ShakespeareFan00. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

...to you and yours, from Canada's Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:03, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shakespearefan. Before tagging a file for deletion, you might want to check if the data was vandalized before you got there (see diff).

Thanks for giving me a sip of nostalgia, though. I uploaded that picture almost 10 years ago! :-) Cheers, Manifestation (talk) 11:23, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, what da ya know, this image actually *can* be deleted now. I found a better version and uploaded it: File:Mozilla boxing.jpg. Cheers, Manifestation (talk) 12:11, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to consider this a {{db-g7}} request, Manifestation. Primefac (talk) 12:20, 16 March 2018 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

Thanks, Primefac, for the swift response. Cheers, Manifestation (talk) 12:23, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will contact the people who gave me permission to use the photos,and request that they provide me with written permission as per the Wikipedia guidelines.

Thanks.

Philip Czaplowski (talk) 21:45, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Why did ask for speed deletion of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Migav_logo_en.jpg

This is the new logo of this organism: http://www.misgav.org.il/objDoc.asp?PID=478377&OID=722555&DivID=1 The page show the required license : This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Background story; The spokesman of the Misgav Regional Council ask me how to update their Logo at Wikipedia, this is what I did.

What more is needed ? Bernard Sfez (talk) 05:19, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Bernard Sfez: , Wikipedia can't use Non-Commerical licenses. Either the logo will have to be under "fair use" rules or you will need to provided prove that the licenses has been updated to one without the non-commerical clause.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:07, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there - would it be possible to add an edit summary describing the changes you are making? It would be much less time-consuming than viewing what changes have been made to file changes by checking every diff. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 09:21, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jon Kolbert: Ah Okay , Thanks for the reminder. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:23, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And it helps if I remember as well.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:35, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your message about requesting the owners of images I uploaded granting permission for their images to be used freely. I'll get permission explicitly to that effect within the next 72 hrs

Aghachi7 (talk) 00:18, 20 March 2018 (UTC) Aghachi7 (talk) 00:18, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I received notifications for messages from you, but didn't see them on my Talk page. I would like to ensure that I uploaded the Merle Temkin images properly, but because I can't see your comments, am not clear on what I may have done incorrrectly. I would appreciate your help. I did have some trouble changing the image pages from fair-use claims after I discovered that public domain versions of them were available. Mianvar1 (talk) 11:29, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mianvar1: You don't need to worry, or do anything. I removed the notifications when I figured that you'd in good faith put a {{cc-zero}} on what should have been an {{information}} block. Updating this solved the issue, and so the notifications were removed as they no longer applied.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:57, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i got a message saying that you requested the file "Rear view of the Kedarnath Temple.jpg" for speedy deletion. Please tell me the reason for this request. I don't find any reasons for deletion. Please go through the image description. Kiranmadhu.e (talk) 12:24, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]