Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Garlanbw (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Peter (talk | contribs)
rv, this isn't the place to say this
Line 5: Line 5:
| next = [[/Archives|Archives]] ([[/Archives/{{CURRENTYEAR}}/{{CURRENTMONTH}}|current]])→
| next = [[/Archives|Archives]] ([[/Archives/{{CURRENTYEAR}}/{{CURRENTMONTH}}|current]])→
| shortcut = WP:RFI
| shortcut = WP:RFI
| notes = This page allows users to request administrator investigation of '''certain''' types of abuse only. Do not use this page until you read the [[/Help|policies, guidelines, and procedures]]. For obvious vandalism, see [[WP:AIV|Administrator intervention against vandalism]]. '''Alerts that do not belong on this page may be removed without action or notice.In some cases a user may become blocked due to someone using the same computer to vandalize wikipedia. TO solve this you simply talk with the administrator'''
| notes = This page allows users to request administrator investigation of '''certain''' types of abuse only. Do not use this page until you read the [[/Help|policies, guidelines, and procedures]]. For obvious vandalism, see [[WP:AIV|Administrator intervention against vandalism]]. '''Alerts that do not belong on this page may be removed without action or notice.'''





Revision as of 13:42, 11 October 2006

Index of request pages Requests for investigation Archives (current)→
 This page allows users to request administrator investigation of certain types of abuse only. Do not use this page until you read the policies, guidelines, and procedures. For obvious vandalism, see Administrator intervention against vandalism. Alerts that do not belong on this page may be removed without action or notice.


    Watchlist

    • Report in this section:
    1. Articles being hit with a very high level of vandalism or that are repeatedly vandalised with an extended time before reverts.
    2. Registered users or IPs that have carried out clear vandalism but have currently stopped.
    • Do not report here:
    1. Articles featured on the front page, or very high profile articles - these will already be watched
    2. Vandals needing to be blocked - see WP:AIV instead.
    3. Users needing investigation - see one of the sections below.
    • Use the following format:
    * {{article|article name}} - brief explanation // ~~~~ or
    * {{vandal|username}} - brief explanation // ~~~~ or
    * {{IPvandal|Ip_Address}} - brief explanation //~~~~

    Watchlist requests

    • The Focus Group was malisciously deleted without provocation or just cause.
    • example (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Example user blanked several articles, but stopped after being warned. Petros471 19:59, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Coyote Shivers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) has been the subject of a long edit war between three people named in the article editing anonymously. The battle (Coyote and 2 of his ex-wives) was mentioned on Fox News' web site and the article is now being reverted by an anon IP removing the sourced paragraph about the battle. Thatcher131 02:31, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Duane Chapman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) 69.130.82.106, an anonymous user keeps linking sites which seem to be nothing more than ads for Tee shirts. I have warned him 3 times so far to knock it off. Duke53 | Talk 04:30, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Atheism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) has been vandalized by User:A7X 900 more than once recently and anonymous IPs multiple times every day. All such edits show a religious bent. Please investigate. Thank you very much. Xiner 01:10, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Weis Markets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) has been repeatedly vandalized over the past week, multiplie times every day, by an anonymous IP. The user keeps adding the same stuff--something about a black bear, and another paragraph about Weis being voted "best place to fart in." He/she then adds varied other things, all related to the "farting" theme. It's getting irritating. Is it possible to lock this page for a while so that only registered users can edit it? Thanks much. --Captadam 02:23, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Food (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views): A whole host of accounts and IPs (probably the same person) have been vandalizing the food article several times a day over the past week. I have no idea why. I issue short-term blocks whenever I see the trouble, but any help would be appreciated. If you would keep an eye on it, perhaps he'll give up. – Quadell (talk) (random) 00:39, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Freakazoid! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views): The section on Enemies has been repeatedly vandalized by a series of IPs to cut a section on one character, Candle Jack, off short. It's a joke, as a quick reading of the character's entry will make clear, but it's obvious whoever it is will keep doing it. I don't know what's appropriate, but a semi-protect seems in order. // Jay Maynard 17:55, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    IP addresses

    Do not report obvious vandalism here; see Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Only report IP addresses that are engaged in complicated, deceptive vandalism that will require more than a few moments for an administrator to analyse. Please read the policies, guidelines, and procedures before reporting.

    Requests

    Please use this format at the top of this section:

    ===={{IPvandal|IP Address}}====

    Brief Description. ~~~~

    72.225.244.118 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

    This anonymous user is, apparently in an automatic way, adding and readding the same links to photographs to French and other countries buildings articles. They don't look as vandalism, but they're highly against WP:style in format; I wrote him in his talk, but he anyway ocntinued in the practice. It seems he uses different IPs, as I found the same pseudo-link spam in other articles, added by different IPs.Attilios 19:51, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    • Just vandalized Metz with injustified removing of list of places of interest.--Attilios 15:56, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


    24.117.151.163 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

    Look at his contributions. I think it may be a bot or something, because all it is doing is changing around either the external links or references of unrelated articles beginning with the letter z. Can someone investigate this? ĶĩřβȳŤįɱéØ 09:08, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    216.146.109.42 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

    I have linked User:216.146.109.42 to another account that has been vandalising (requested closure of User:Corey Bryant) - see either user page for details. The vandalism in non-obvious, over months, but I and others have reverted both of these. I must go now, so cannot investigate 216.146.109.42 to revert and warn. Please investigate and block if my suspicion is right. Widefox 04:33, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]



    Registered users

    Read the policies, guidelines, and procedures before reporting. Do not report content or user disputes here, unless you can provide links demonstrating a strong attempt at dispute resolution. Please use this format at the top of this section:

    ===={{vandal|User_name}}====

    Brief Description. ~~~~

    Usernames are case sensitive.

    New requests

    Under investigation

    User:J intela

    User has been adding incoherent, seemingly original research text (and a copyvio) to various articles. Warned him, he continues. Because of the way he started off (he was doing the same under an IP before), I think this might be more appropriate reported as vandalism than a content dispute. Correct me if I'm wrong. CRCulver 00:07, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Barjammar

    Strange goings-on at the Barry Marshall page. I can only think of three possibilities, in order of likelihood:

    1. Barjammar is a user who has pretended to be Barry Marshall elsewhere on the Internet.

    2. Barjammar is Barry Marshall and Dr. Marshall is a victim of identity theft since there is someone on television in the US claiming to be him appearing in infomercials by Bottom Line Health.

    3. Barjammar is Barry Marshall and is knowingly reverting true information (i.e. that he appeared in an infomercial in the US).

    I'm looking for YouTube footage or other documentation of the appearance. In the meantime I've accepted the current version of the article by User:Glockmeister. Mjk2357 03:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    Update - on Bottom Line Health's webpage there is a slogan "Nobel prize winners join the greatest health team ever assembeled," but it doesn't say which nobel prize winner. I still can't find a clip. Mjk2357 23:23, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    Mathewignash (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Mathewignash continues to add copyrighted text to Transformers articles, despite being warned multiple times not to do so. Examples include:

    You can see several warnings on his talk page about this ranging the year. Interrobamf 12:54, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    Warrants further monitoring. User has repeatedly added copyrighted text to articles. The Transformers articles he created may be completely tainted. —Centrxtalk • 18:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User:LordStryfe

    This user's account has only been used to add external links, and always to the same website. He/she has been warned to stop spamming in the past by several people (see talk), but they persist. -Patstuart 15:33, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User has been inactive for a while. Keeping here for a little while longer for monitoring. —Centrxtalk • 18:32, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


    Donotsayno (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    User has made many poor and nonsensical edits to TV station articles ([5], [6], [7], [8]), we've tried to discuss it with him on his talk page, but he never answers. --CFIF 23:40, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    • As an addendum, it seems as if this user adds information and changes some dates, with no sources to back those changes up. —Whomp t/c 00:41, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • I have just recently happened to block a nearly-identical user account, Ddanno35 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). I have given Donotsayno a final warning regarding image uploads and have filed a sockpuppet accusation.--Konstable 10:15, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Donotsayno. —Centrxtalk • 18:49, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    See also

    Aurora marvel comics characters profile and data has been deleted

    Leave a Reply