Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:St. Joseph's Hospital, Baramulla, from its old location at User:Jeromeenriquez/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 13:52, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment they left was:

Wikipedia articles about establishments like this hospital require strong referencing in order to be suitable for inclusion. However, this draft does not yet provide any references. Please find and add a variety of reliable, independent (third-party) sources that discuss the subject in significant detail. Thanks,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St. Joseph's Hospital, Baramulla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wiae /tlk 13:52, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Jeromeenriquez, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wiae /tlk 13:52, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment they left was:

See WP:Referencing for beginners, still needs any further available in-depth third-party news sources overall.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St. Joseph's Hospital, Baramulla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:35, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

I made the links you provided clickable so we can at least see what sources there are. However, you need to visit the TeaHouse to get help on referencing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St. Joseph's Hospital, Baramulla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 18:02, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zppix was:

please read this section within the manual of style

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St. Joseph's Hospital, Baramulla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 13:31, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. Please consider submitting to Wikipedia:Requested articles instead. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Only references no content!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ivan Pereira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:18, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tokyogirl79 was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jeromeenriquez/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:46, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:47, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://www.e-pao.net/epSubPageExtractor.asp?src=leisure.Rock_Concert.Reminiscences_of_an_era_By_Ringo_and_Jyaneswar. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly exists under a compatible licence and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• User:Jeromeenriquez/sandbox/The Cannibals Rock Band Of Manipur may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:48, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anarchyte was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jeromeenriquez/sandbox/Ivan Pereira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:35, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Jeromeenriquez/sandbox/Ivan Pereira requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2014/12/03/fr_ivan_pereira_new_bishop_of_jammu-srinagar/1113450. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:14, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ivan Pereira requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2014/12/03/fr_ivan_pereira_new_bishop_of_jammu-srinagar/1113450. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:14, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• This is a final warning - do not add text from any other location on to Wikipedia. If it has been published elsewhere, assume that it is copyrighted. It looks like I'm the first person to warn you, however you've posted so much copyrighted text that I need to warn you that any other copyvio will lead to a block from editing, possibly permanently. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:24, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ivan Pereira is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Pereira until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meatsgains (talk) 03:30, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jeromeenriquez. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 16:30, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jeromeenriquez/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 19:26, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cannibals band was formed in 1986 by Paul (Singer) with the line-up of Momocha on drums, Ritchie on Lead Guitar, Jimmy on Guitar and Mathew on Bass. The Band hails from Imphal, Manipur, India. Cannibals shot to fame instantly outclassing other bands in almost all the major competition of India, they became one of the most prominent rock in the country during the 80's. The band was at the summit of its career and toured all over India. Some of the achievement of the band was winning the North East Zone Musical competition, Dimapur, All India Western Music competition held at Shri Ram College, New Delhi and Music competition of St Xavier's etc. However, the glory days of Cannibals came to an end in 1992.

Cannibals also had two originals like the "Sweet Reggae" and "Dirty Boy Blues". see this, this and this Jerome E John 10:59, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia and Wikiwand are neither coverage or reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cannibals A Rock Band From Manipur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:19, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jeromeenriquez/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:18, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cannibals A Rock Band From Manipur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ProgrammingGeek was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cannibals A Rock Band From Manipur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ProgrammingGeek ^talktome 13:58, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has no properly formatted footnotes.

Remove signature from end. Wikipedia articles in article space are not signed.

The subject, as a Roman Catholic bishop, does appear to be notable, but proper sources are required.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hippolytus Anthony Kunnunkal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:50, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yashovardhan Dhanania was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Concerns raised earlier about NPOV have not been fixed

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hippolytus Anthony Kunnunkal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Yashovardhan (talk) 14:21, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gaan-Ngai. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 01:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jeromeenriquez, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Burn Hall School have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Meters (talk) 03:44, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tangmarg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashmiri. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

St. Peter's High School, India, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 23:01, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Would highly benefit from all additional sourcing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Moravian Mission School, Leh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:13, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of schools in India

added links pointing to St. Mary's School, Delhi Public School, St. Joseph's School, Katra, St. Peter's High School, Christ School and Little Flower School

Baramulla district

added a link pointing to National Conference

St. Peter’s Higher Secondary School, Karan Bagh

added a link pointing to St. Peter's High School

Udhampur

added a link pointing to NH 1A

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Moravian Mission School, Leh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.rjelal.com/4.3.16c/793-804%20Dr.%20KHURSHEED%20AHMAD%20QAZI.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ProgrammingGeek ^talktome 17:05, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.rjelal.com/4.3.16c/793-804%20Dr.%20KHURSHEED%20AHMAD%20QAZI.pdf. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly exists under a compatible licence and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Moravian Mission School, Leh may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ProgrammingGeek ^talktome 17:07, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://e-pao.net/epSubPageSelector.asp?src=Momocha_Laishram_Veteran_Drummer_of_Rock_Band_Cannibals_A_Profile_By_Jimmy_Leivon&ch=features&sub1=Profile_of_Manipuri_Personalities. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly exists under a compatible licence and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Cannibals A Rock Band From Manipur may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ProgrammingGeek ^talktome 17:11, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://www.thesangaiexpress.com/significance-of-gaan-ngai-festival. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly exists under a compatible licence and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Gaan-Ngai may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ProgrammingGeek ^talktome 17:16, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Johnstone Higher Secondary School, Imphal

added a link pointing to Sir James Johnstone

Leh

added a link pointing to IAS

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating List of Catholic Churches in India, Jeromeenriquez!

Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating this useful list!

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 16:34, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List of Christian Schools in India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Adem20^talk 20:06, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Elliot321. Jeromeenriquez, thanks for creating List of Christian Schools in India!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add a lead section explaining the content of this page, then a heading, before the list. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Elliot321 (talk) 22:18, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article St. Mary's Church, Gulmarg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG, no significant coverage found after a Google search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. South Nashua (talk) 20:14, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jeromeenriquez,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Carmel Gospel Missions for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TimothyJosephWood 15:48, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St. Mary's Church, Gulmarg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Mary's Church, Gulmarg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. South Nashua (talk) 20:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Alphonsa Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Nagercoil, Jeromeenriquez!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Can you please look this over and see if you can help address the improvement tags? Thanks for creating the article.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 19:05, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating St. Marys School, Jajpur Road, Odisha, Jeromeenriquez!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Can you please look this over and see if you can add references which aren't WP:PRIMARYSOURCES? Thanks for creating this.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 19:13, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jeromeenriquez,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether St. Mary Joseph's High School, Hyderabad should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Mary Joseph's High School, Hyderabad .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Meatsgains (talk) 23:41, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Hippolytus Anthony Kunnunkal a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. ―Biochemistry🙴❤ 06:22, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hippolytus Anthony Kunnunkal. Thanks! ―Biochemistry🙴❤ 06:30, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Hippolytus Anthony Kunnunkal a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Hippolytus Anthony Kunnunkal. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. ―Biochemistry🙴❤ 06:31, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are you writing a list (so let's change the name) or an article (sources, please).Xx236 (talk) 09:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christ CMI Central School, Anjugramam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christ CMI Central School, Anjugramam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dlohcierekim (talk) 09:01, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jeromeenriquez. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Japfü Christian College, Nagaland, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Domdeparis (talk) 16:56, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on James Thoppil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://directory.ucanews.com/bishops/bishop-thoppil/88. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:21, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jeromeenriquez, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:22, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Leo Cornelio has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Hi again, like I mentioned on my talk page, you cannot copy and paste text into Wikipedia. I was able to excise the text pasted into this article so we didn't have to delete all of it, but it was still a copyright violation that will require and administrator to delete the revision history. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:29, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Nagaland Bible College requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://nagalandbiblecollege.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:27, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE as infobox images have a different, simplified format to other images, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 17:17, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Holy Cross College of Nursing, Ambikapur, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of https://www.collegedekho.com/colleges/holy-cross-college-of-nursing-ambikapur. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

  If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Yeryry (talk) 11:56, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jeromeenriquez, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Holy Cross College of Nursing, Ambikapur have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:21, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jeromeenriquez,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Snehagiri Missionary Sisters for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Killer Moff (talk) 15:46, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jeromeenriquez,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sadhu Sevana Sisters for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Killer Moff (talk) 15:47, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jeromeenriquez,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Seva Missionary Sisters of Mary for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Killer Moff (talk) 15:47, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jeromeenriquez,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sisters of Sacred Sciences for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Killer Moff (talk) 15:48, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Hippolytus Anthony Kunnunkal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ―Biochemistry🙴❤ 17:12, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Hippolytus Anthony Kunnunkal, Jeromeenriquez!

Wikipedia editor TonyBallioni just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've removed the previous speedy deletion tag. Bishops are generally notable, but do your best to cite to independent reliable sources when you can. Google books is very good for this.

To reply, leave a comment on TonyBallioni's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

TonyBallioni (talk) 17:50, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm reaching out to you because I see you've had some recent A7 taggings on South Asian Christian (mainly Catholic) topics. As I've expressed to you before, I appreciate people who are trying to expand the coverage of Catholicism in particular and Christianity in general in South Asia, because it is a significant historical and societal topic and it is one that we are lacking coverage of. A few pieces of advice:

1. Bishops are almost always notable, but very few new page patrollers are familiar with a random diocese in India or Pakistan. You need to make it clear why we should have the bishop in the encyclopedia. The easiest way to do this is to show coverage in reliable sources when you create the article rather than waiting for me or one of the other people who can scrounge up sources on clerics comes around to save the day. Google Books is your friend here.
2. Religious congregations are not always notable, and sometimes might not be significant. Bishops most admins will think twice about deleting via speedy deletion, but groupings of consecrated religious probably won't because they are organizations. If they are notable, demonstrate it through adding sources to independent coverage, either in newspapers, non-blog websites, or Books (again, Google Books is your friend).
3. You've been doing much better on this from what I can tell, but saying it again just for emphasis: write everything in your own words. I will nominate a bishop for speedy deletion if it is 97% copied, and I'm one of the few people on new page patrol who knows enough about clerics to try to get them into shape as an article.

I hope this is helpful. If you have any questions, you are always free to reach out to me. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:10, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm PRehse. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PRehse (talk) 16:47, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Antony Pappusamy, Jeromeenriquez!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating this. You may well be in the middle of adding stuff, but if not, can you please look it over and see if you can address the tags? This is an unreferenced biography of a living person, so is likely to be swiftly deleted as we have to be really careful about making unsubstantiated articles about living people.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 19:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ignatius Brouwer MHM and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 06:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating William D'Souza S.J., Jeromeenriquez!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please remove the first reference. You already have a link to the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Patna - and Wikipedia should never be given as a reference to support a statement. Ironically, ir is not regarded as reliable. Article seems to be an orphan - please update the RCA of P page which has a red link. The epithet SJ should not, I feel, be part of the article's title. I will rename this for you. Please add a title to the 2nd reference (highlighted in red on the article page)

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 00:00, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Stephen Lepcha, Jeromeenriquez!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add some categories, embolden the article name in the lead sentence, and de-capitalise 'Ordained'. Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 00:05, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Thomas Ignatius MacWan, Jeromeenriquez!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please embolden the subject name in the lead sentence. Most importantly, please do not use capital letters for ordinary words where these are not part of a title. I'm seeing you do this a lot in many of your new articles, and it goes against Wikipedia's encyclopaedic style. e.g. 'Ordained' 'Installed' Please read WP:CAPITALIZATION for guidance on how to approach this in future.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 07:44, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Fr. Agnel School, Noida, Jeromeenriquez!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Is this a secondary school? If so, it needs enhancing; if not, it may not meet notability guidelines and will be deleted.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 08:18, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. Jeromeenriquez, thanks for creating Shalom Bible Seminary, Kohima!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Wikipedia is not a directory, and this article is too short to be of use to anyone. Which country is it in - you may know where Nagaland is, but others won't? What is a seminary? It needs a wikilink to help explain. What does this educational establishment offer? Normally, college articles are far too wordy - this one is far too short, I feel

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Nick Moyes (talk) 11:12, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. Jeromeenriquez, thanks for creating Filadelfia Bible College, Udaipur!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please state in the article what country this college is in, please

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Nick Moyes (talk) 11:20, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm reaching out to you to encourage you to help make Wikipedia a really great encyclopedia. You'll see I have been page patrolling a number of incredibly short articles you have been producing recently. Your enthusiasm is to be welcomed, but so is quality of content. Put yourself in the shoes of someone who does not live in India as you do, and doesn't know what the subject is about. It's your responsibility to help them understand, and to do it in a way that follows the layout and style of all the other articles here. I can see you've been working hard to improve this (after a rather shaky start), but I'd like to suggest a few things you need to consider doing:

• SLOW DOWN! It's not a race to create the largest number of articles. Quality is more important than quantity. Focus on quality, please!
• Embolden the title in the first sentence of the article - you seem to forget to do this sometimes. It would help if you would go back and check all the articles you have created for this omission, please.
• Put references after the stated facts - not after the name of the article, just three or four words in.
• Add at least one or two categories to every article.
• Do not use capital letters for words like 'ordination' or 'bishop'. Save them only for use with real titles and organisation names. Saying that someone was made a bishop is fine; saying they were made a Bishop is not. See John Barwa or Sarat Chandra Nayak.
• If it's a secondary school, say so clearly in the article. People like me, with no strong interest in the subject, won't then have to waste their time trying to decide whether to put one of your quite poor stubs forward for speedy deletion as non-notable. If it's a secondary school, it is inherently notable. So please just help us by saying so clearly! See Little Flower School, Imphal and St. Joseph's School, Imphalla (which both also need wikilinks and country, too, please.)
• Say more! I think you now know that it's not OK to copy and paste words from other websites. But that should not stop you putting important information about the subject in your own words. Many of your new articles are little more than a couple of sentences - rather like a directory, when they could be so much better. Tell us what age groups these colleges take; use wikilinks to words like seminary or bishop to help others understand what they are (e.g.Nicholas of Lesvos; tell us what country these people or places are in, and use wikilinks with them. (see Sarat Chandra Nayak Surprisingly, most other articles on unknown schools and colleges are far too wordy, and go into inordinate amounts of trivial detail. Yours are the opposite! Make them just a bit longer to give the reader enough basic information about them.
• Do not use Wikipedia as a reference. It is not regarded as a 'reliable source'. Put links to Wikipedia either as a wikilink, or create a 'See Also' section which you can list them in. e.g. Cettin
• Don't leave it to others to clean up after you. Take the time to understand the importance of Wikipedia's Manual of Style so you get the content and the layout right first time, and don't leave a mess behind for others to sort out.

Please take this in the positive and supportive way that was intended. I'm copying this message to @TonyBallioni: as I can tell that they are also keen to see you improve your work here so it's something you can be really proud of. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 11:57, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jeromeenriquez,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Christ School, Poonch should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christ School, Poonch .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Nick Moyes (talk) 12:40, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Indian Missionary Society and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 04:07, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding flags to infoboxes - as per MOS:ICON#Avoid_flag_icons_in_infoboxes these are only allowed in very limited cases, such as international sportspeople - not writers - which you have been adding them to. Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 16:32, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You do not appear willing to correct your previous incorrect edits, and in this edit at 17.23, nearly an hour after our earlier posts, you move the flag, rather than deleting it.
Furthermore, you keep adding links to disambiguation pages, such as Indian, which will also need to be revisited and corrected.
I have been trying to unpick your previous edits, and only remove the flags, but it would be much easier just to revert them all. Please take responsibility for your previous actions and resolve them. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:50, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm TonyBallioni. Jeromeenriquez, thanks for creating Béchara Abou Mrad!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Adding additional sources and footnotes will help readers verify the content.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

TonyBallioni (talk) 15:09, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! - Nocowardsoulismine (talk) 19:50, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - you may not have noticed that the page you have recently created, Ladislao Bukowinski, already exists since December 2015 as Wladyslaw Bukowinski. You may want to incorporate the information from your page into that article and I, in the meantime, have already placed a template requesting a merger with the article already in existence. Lord Sidious 82 (talk) 11:10, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Aleixo das Neves Dias has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 23:39, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Like Tony said, your work is appreciated, and I hope you won't get discouraged. If you can follow the advice to involve yourself a little bit more in the policy areas of Wikipedia, message me again next month. Regards, Alex Shih^Talk 05:27, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hindi as the official language of India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mostly duplicates Languages of India and Hindi. Would need heavy copy-edit if kept because a rough quality translation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 10:50, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Next time you wish to create a new article based upon a draft article you have created please move the article rather than blanking the original and creating a new one from scratch as you did with St. Joseph's Hospital, Baramulla. Thank you. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 01:22, 10 September 2017 (UTC) Thank you Uncle Milty for the tip. Will keep in mind for future. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 07:53, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/María Teresalina Sánchez at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 10:56, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jeromeenriquez,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Anthony Alwyn Fernandes Barreto for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Template:Z166

Arbustum (talk) 17:05, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Anthony Alwyn Fernandes Barreto requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://directory.ucanews.com/bishops/bishop-fernandes-barreto/197. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Arbustum (talk) 17:06, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Jim Borst at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 11:00, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The one reference added is from the society itself. Please add further references that show that independent, reliable publications have written in-depth articles about the society.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Indian Missionary Society and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Akbar's Church at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 11:49, 23 September 2017 (UTC) Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Nicholas Bunkerd Kitbamrung at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 11:49, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Akbar's Church at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! TonyBallioni (talk) 23:55, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Nicholas Bunkerd Kitbamrung at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 12:48, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Bastiampillai Anthonipillai Thomas at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:45, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Akhu Chingangbam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhu Chingangbam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. MacTidy (talk) 15:48, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Tingkao Ragwang Chapriak (TRC) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://e-pao.net/epSubPageExtractor.asp?src=manipur.Manipur_and_Religion.Tingkao_Ragwang_Chapriak_Part_1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:45, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeromeenriquez, Tony has been kindly going through some of your recent contributions, and several of them had clear cases of close paraphrasing. This is a common mistake: Even if you cite the sources correctly, you still have to summarize the source content in your own words, or add quotation marks if you are incorporating a phrase. Failing to do so runs the risk of copyright violations. Regards, Alex Shih^Talk 03:35, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jeromeenriquez, prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the law to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. There's more information about copyrights and how it applies to Wikipedia at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Copyright law and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 07:01, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jeromeenriquez. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. I'm sorry I've had to file this, but as Diannaa has explained above, this is a policy with legal implications and unfortunately I've stumbled across enough copyright violations last night and today where I think we need to look through your contributions more systemically to see if the text is free. This is not undervaluing the positive work that you do, but unfortunately Wikipedia cannot allow copyright violations on its website, so when the issue becomes a pattern, we have to look into it. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:45, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Simon Srugi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.salesianmissions.org/about-us/ven-simon-srugi. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:47, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you just added yourself to the Wikipedia:Peer review volunteer list for religion. If you have some time to look over Wikipedia:Peer_review/Mullá_Husayn/archive2 I'd really appreciate it.penultimate_supper (talk) 16:55, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pius Thomas D’Souza has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Vasemmistolainen (talk) 14:43, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vasemmistolainen Thank you. I have already provided the references.Jeromeenriquez (talk) 14:54, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to this wiki in violation of our copyright policy and copyright law. You cannot resume editing until you provide a clear statement that demonstrates that you have read and understand our copyright policy and intend to follow it in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:07, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jeromeenriquez (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I do agree that i have been warned in past about copyright, but can't you notice that i haven't repeated the same. I am still working on the article that you have picked up and blocked me without any notice. I really don't understand one thing about all of us at Wikipedia, we are always in a hurry to point out mistakes in other's works rather than waiting for sometime and letting the other person finish his or her piece of work. We are all trying to contribute in the best possible way to make Wikipedia a beautiful, simple and complete platform of knowledge for the world but pointing out issues in each others contribution that too without waiting for the them to complete it, is very irritating and disheartening act. I am really sorry to say but if we continue like this people will keep turning away from contributing on Wikipedia. I have been contributing on Wikipedia from past one year but haven't received any word of appreciation, have only received warnings, errors, notifications and today i have finally been blocked because of a reason that i was still working on the article and had pasted few lines from some other source but was intending to change them into my own words. The copyright policy was advised to me by User:TonyBallioni and i did read it.

Decline reason:

You can not place copyrighted material that has not been released under a CC-BY-SA 3.0 licence (or freer) here on Wikipedia, not for one revision or even for one second. The moment you hit Save when there is even one example of copyright violation in your text, you are breaking Wikipedia's copyright policy and you are breaking the law. You will not be unblocked until you understand that and give a believable commitment to adhering to it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:10, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Jeromeenriquez, I alerted Diannaa to this situation, and I am very sad that it had to come to a block, but I wanted an uninvolved administrator to make the call since you and I have a good relationship (it is also the reason I will not be unblocking, someone who is uninvolved needs to judge). The issue here, as I have tried to explain before is that Wikipedia certifies that every revision on its site can be reused under the terms of the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license. We simply cannot have any text that has been copied wholesale on this website at any time.
  As I mentioned, I consider myself somewhat WP:INVOLVED, with you, so I will not be taking any administrative action in regards to blocking or unblocking, but what I suggest you do to let another administrator review is the following: promise to completely write the prose of your articles off Wikipedia before creating them. Your problem seems to be that you use the sources and then try to work towards removing the copyright violations. Doing this in a text file rather than on Wikipedia is the best way to do this. Also, I thought I had told you before, but if I haven't, I do appreciate all the good content you write for Wikipedia. I just want to make sure it follows the law and our terms of use. Much of it does, but you currently have too many articles that don't. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:58, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]