Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Line 54: Line 54:
::::::Agreed [[User:Home Lander|Home Lander]]. Just wanted to make you aware. And thanks, {{ping|ChocolateRabbit}}. We're both aware of the protocol, I just thought since HL had the most recent encounter, any report should be theirs. Cheers. [[User:X4n6|X4n6]] ([[User talk:X4n6|talk]]) 08:23, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
::::::Agreed [[User:Home Lander|Home Lander]]. Just wanted to make you aware. And thanks, {{ping|ChocolateRabbit}}. We're both aware of the protocol, I just thought since HL had the most recent encounter, any report should be theirs. Cheers. [[User:X4n6|X4n6]] ([[User talk:X4n6|talk]]) 08:23, 12 August 2017 (UTC)


:::::::{{you|X4n6}} Okay understood. Cheers Kind regards <b style="font-family:arial">[[User:ChocolateRabbit|<b style="color:brown">Chocolate</b>]]</b><b style="font-family:arial">[[User talk:ChocolateRabbit|<b style="color:green">Rabbit</b>]]</b> 10:58, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
:::::::{{yo|X4n6}} Okay understood. Cheers Kind regards <b style="font-family:arial">[[User:ChocolateRabbit|<b style="color:brown">Chocolate</b>]]</b><b style="font-family:arial">[[User talk:ChocolateRabbit|<b style="color:green">Rabbit</b>]]</b> 10:58, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:59, 12 August 2017

NEW USERS AND IP EDITORS: If I have inadvertently reverted your good faith edits and warned you regarding vandalism or similar, please do not take offense. Leave me a note in a new section on this page and, upon review, I will revert my own edits and remove the warnings. This is preferable to you simply undoing my reverts, where I am less likely to recognize that you are undoing them in good faith.

DACA edits

The use of the term "undocumented" is a WP:EUPHEMISIM that gives the article a certain political slant. No one in the talk page has given any non political reason for using the term in place of the more accurate term "illegal", other then that it is a common phrase. Being common, does not override Wikipedia's rule of not using euphemisms.

A message from 70.52.191.244

hey Home Lander, thank you for your feedback however the reason I added the information that I did is because I work for a large animal vet office and a client used the term supernumerary and my colleague and I were confused, so we googled it and google definition just confused us even more. We had a Dr. Vet as well as a vet tech fill us in. Then it made sense. I have re-entered my information. I hope it is to your liking and if not please let me know or take the info and enter it yourself how you would like it to be entered. Either way I feel it is important information for the agricultural world. Thank you. Sofia70.52.191.244 (talk) 20:25, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well it doesn't really fit there and it isn't sourced either; I initially thought it was a joke honestly. Think the page is better of without it. Home Lander (talk) 20:26, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Thanks for your recent help in expanding my knowledge further about Wikipedia. Kind regards ChocolateRabbit 00:06, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IP block report?

Hi Home Lander,

I recently had an encounter with this IP myself. I know it's a shared, gov't IP, but time for a block report maybe? X4n6 (talk) 10:54, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello X4n6. I see your warning and conversation left above mine on their talk page. Since it's been several days since then, I've reverted their latest (again, unsourced) edit to Magenta and left them a level 3 warning. If they continue soon, then I think we can go level four and/or request a sysop to block. Thanks for messaging me. Home Lander (talk) 14:26, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Home Lander and X4n6: Hi, if necessary they can be reported to admins at this noticeboard. Happy editing. Kind regards ChocolateRabbit 17:20, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I'm there all the time. I don't think they've edited enough within the last couple days to warrant a block, however. If they fire up again, then one can pull the trigger. Home Lander (talk) 18:05, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Of course. Kind regards ChocolateRabbit 18:30, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed Home Lander. Just wanted to make you aware. And thanks, @ChocolateRabbit:. We're both aware of the protocol, I just thought since HL had the most recent encounter, any report should be theirs. Cheers. X4n6 (talk) 08:23, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@X4n6: Okay understood. Cheers Kind regards ChocolateRabbit 10:58, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply