NOMINATIONS ARE NOW OPEN: You can nominate a candidate or nominate yourself here.

• Eligible candidates are any user who is a member of the New New Page Reviewer group and who is not blocked, nor suspended from reviewing, and all admins and bureaucrats.
• Eligible to vote are any registered, autoconfirmed users.

A short description of why the candidate fits the role followed by your signature as nominator or self-nominator. Nominated candidates must accept or decline the nomination. Begin each new nomination with an asterisk (*).
VOTING DOES NOT BEGIN YET.
Note: User:Kudpung will not be running in the election, but will remain as coordinator emeritus for up to 12 months.

• Nomination period: Sunday 5 February to 23:59 UTC Sunday 19 February
• Voting period: Monday 20 February to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March

This first election will be coordinated and the results announced by Admins Kudpung and MusikAnimal.

Nominations (voting does not begin yet)

• Jbhunley Has a good understanding of the process. Has been an invaluable support to the sytem in getting recent developments off the ground. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Accept nomination Yes/No + signature

• Kudpung thank you for the nomination. I am going to consider it for a bit before I accept or decline. There is quite a bit I would like to see happen with NPR/P and I would like to help as much as possible but I also have another large volunteer commitment so I need to think of how much time I can reliably give to the project. I do not want to commit to something and end up doing a poor job. However it works out I will support the project as best I can, either as a Coordinator or helping with stuff as much as the Coordinators want. Jbh ^Talk 00:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Joe Roe Has a good understanding of the process. Quick to understand technical details. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies but I'll have to decline too. I'm flattered to be nominated and ordinarily would consider it, but I'm currently in the middle of writing up my PhD thesis and can't commit to giving the role regular attention. I do however think that having designated coordinators is an excellent idea, and you certainly deserve a break from it Kudpung! – Joe (talk) 14:15, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Robert McClenon Actively takes part in discussions bringing new ideas and food for thought. Aware of what is at stake. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Accept nomination Yes/No + signature

• Fuhghettaboutit (admin) Deeply concerned that patrollers/reviewers get it right. Contributed significantly to the rewrite of the tutorial with an impressive eye for detail. Good organiser, but possibly busy in other areas. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Accept nomination Yes/No + signature

• Chris troutman Experienced editor and new page reviewer. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 06:33, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Accept Chris Troutman (talk) 06:58, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• samtar(admin} Been around for 8 years, has followed and has a perfect grasp of the importance of these issues . Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:11, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to help -- Samtar ^{talk · contribs} 10:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• (Candidate name here) + rationale + signature of proposer or candidate

Accept nomination Yes/No + signature

• (Candidate name here) + rationale + signature of proposer or candidate

Accept nomination Yes/No + signature