• contribs) 11:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply] 

Hi Kavdiamanju

I had not really understood the rules on "asserted importance" however the company is of sufficient size to warrant an encyclopedic entry, employing as it does over 3000 staff and being based in more than 35 countries. Similar industry pages exist; for FCM Travel Solutions, Radius Travel network etc

Is it a question of providing further information?

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamierhysmorris (talk • contribs) 08:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kavdiamanju,

How can I prepare the page like, to not be deleted? https://www.wikiwand.com/en/OrangeHRM

Please give me more time to update it to be more valuable Cheers,

You can delete Toronto Rugby League too as thats where my page stemmed off from.. Dear Kavdiamanju,

Please do not delete the page which i have created NoBroker.com on Wikipedia. I need some more time to do research & update it. Please let me know some pointer which i have missed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bharatlok (talk • contribs) 09:38, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1. talk, the page doesn't have reliable references and likely to be deleted. Kavdiamanju (talk) 09:46, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for letting me know the speedy deletion of page I created. That is Electronics and factory automation company in Pakistan have offices in UK and Dubai. Company producing several kinds of LED light too for export to different countries. That isn't a promotional article for company.So it's my humble request to you,to remove this speedy deletion tag from this page.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allowed12345 (talk • contribs) 09:56, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Over at WP:Articles_for_deletion/Nigma_Talib, I see you are making a case that the article Nigma Talib should be considered notable as you claim it meets WP:GNG, WP:BIO, and WP:BLP while not violating WP:FRINGE. Since I disagree, I'd like to understand your point of view on the sources used. As I pointed out in the Afd discussion, the main news/magazine articles do not cover her in depth, aside from mentioning some general attributes about her job as a naturopath and her pseudoscientific theories she promotes. These and the rest of the articles cited seem like they are part of a press junket and are syndicated content rather than being important for her life's achievements. Delta13C (talk) 19:22, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Douggie Reece requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:15, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

you like going around asking for deletion of people's page?

I write that for hours, and got deleted in like minutes, it was a page about a non-profit organization who specializes in dog rescue. abandoned and to-be-eaten dogs.the page matters and it's a no brainer that it shouldn't even be deleted in the first place. that's really rude of you. not even a single explanation on why, and yet many stub articles remain on the wikipedia. so seriously i am really thinking is wikipedia even a goof source of information anymore these days?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by EdwinK87 (talk • contribs) 17:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am wondering your reasoning regarding my page about Arabella? Could you elaborate on your concerns?

Hi Kavdiamanju, I like to improve the article Merrill J Fernando I found you have place an advert tag in it . Can you please point out what change is necessary so that , the tag can be removed. Thanks. Always :) 05:36, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

User:Alwayssmileguys, Please rewrite from a Neutral point of view and not from a fan's point of view. There are certain peacock terms that directly and indirectly promote Merrill J Fernando. Kavdiamanju (talk) 05:42, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. But can you mention those. So it will be easy for me to rewrite it accordingly.

Thanks. Always :) 05:47, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

It will be better if you first read the Five pillars of Wikipedia in the detail and then work on the content. It is a better and most effective way to do it. Are you associated with Merrill J Fernando? Kavdiamanju (talk) 05:49, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kavdiamanju, I've tagged external link for Transformers: Human Alliance because this is an arcade game developed by Sega

It will be better if you first read the Five pillars of Wikipedia in the detail and then work on the content. Kavdiamanju (talk) 07:24, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Excuse me, but regarding the tags you placed on on Sudabeh Mohafez; how can she not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, when she won the Adelbert von Chamisso Prize as well as the MDR-Literaturpreis? Furthermore, she works at various English university faculties. Clearly she's notable enough. Furthermore, the article has 6 weblinks as references (enough for a start/stub-class article), and is linked to the same article which already existed on the German Wiki.

Bests - LouisAragon (talk) 02:35, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You tagged Big Brandon for speedy, but I added a speedy as an attack page. For a clear attack page such as that it is much better to use the G10 criterion. It automatically blanks the page until an admin seals with it, and it usually ensures a rapid response. Meters (talk) 03:04, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken it to AfD, as I feel it could do with discussion. While I think his book is a load of old cobblers (the Queen doesn't have Christmas dinner at Buck House, it's always at Sandringham - and that's just one thing), there is a chance that it's notable old cobblers. It does seem a rather odd book for its publisher to put out, too. Peridon (talk) 11:17, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kavdiamanju! You didn't specified the duplicate page of the deletion's reason. Please tell me which one was that. I really think there is not another page for Snowskates. maybe you meant Snowskate which is a different sport. Thank you for reviewing this case! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Snowskates --Porcero (talk) 19:14, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It really doesn't matter, since it was actually deleted as a promotional article by User:Mike Rosoft. That is who you should probably be talking to. Meters (talk) 19:19, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nauro Machado should not be speedy deleted because Machado was one of the most influential Brazilian poets of the 20th century, along with Gullar, Burnett, Chagas, and Tribuzi. If Gullar has a Wikipedia page, why shouldn't Machado? ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferreira_Gullar) Also, there is an article on Machado in Portuguese, and I believe there should be one in English, too. (https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nauro_Machado) Thank you.

Thank you for letting me know about what speedy deletion is, this is an edit of the original post because the original was edited to not at all what I said, so I shall rewrite what I originally wrote. I want to contest the deletion of the Drew "mytoecold" Monson page because he is a rising YouTube star, and a few other Wikipedia pages have Monson included in them. This is an important page because according to Google Trends in 2015 the amount of "Drew Monson" searches have increased dramatically. The page is a work in progress, please do not delete it.

Hi. I do not believe that this page is promotional in any way, shape, or form. Rather, I believe that this article that was created does not have a "bias" towards the character, as it was primarily composed by other authors who know about the user, containing minimal writing from the user himself. Could you explain how this article is promotional, rather than purely informative? I strongly disagree with this deletion and would like to have the page restored to normal.
This user is a prominent social media influencer, who has worked with several brands within his career. Although this user has a brief career summary, he should not be discriminated upon based off of his age.
I ask that you please restore the page, as people often search for "Steve Rizzo" -- the user -- and accidentally find the wrong person; a motivational speaker. This is causing confusion, so Mr. Rizzo asked me to create this page. If you have any questions, or advice on how to keep the page on Wikipedia, please contact me. I am unfamiliar with uploading to the site, so pardon my ignorance on the topic.

Thank you.

--SteveRizzo

Hi, the article is classified as a stub. A stub tag is placed at the end. I thought this is allowed for future improvement. Let me know if the speedy deletion can be removed or sustained. Thanks.Fanyxa (talk) 03:23, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kavdiamanju, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Alexis Monga, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: other page has been blanked/deletd, it had the wrong capitalisation. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. GedUK  12:58, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for patrolling page. I am new on Wikipedia and cannot find a way to upload a logo. Whenever I click on the upload, it redirects me to the same link and there is no action or popup to upload it. Can you upload logo on Cyfe page? Ran.goodes (talk) 18:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1. Ran.goodes, To upload any image the account must be confirmed (minimum 4 days old). Once you have 10 edits and 4 days old account you will be able to upload any image by yourself. I will suggest to upload it via Commons however non-free copyright images cannot be uploaded from there. For now, I am uploading it for you.Kavdiamanju (talk) 18:24, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kavdiamanju,

That's fine. My own fault, I'm new to Wikipedia anyway, so I didn't really know.

Kind regards, FromAllAspects FromAllAspects (talk) 04:44, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I had prepared the malayalam version of this article.As per the malayalama wikipedia criteria Naslim Neelamkodan can be included. She became a scientist ---[[User:Akbarali]] ([[Talk:Akbarali|Talk]]) (talk) 07:28, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly note that this is an article about a fashion designer in Egypt not used for promoting but for documenting. "Maison Saédi" is a real company in Egypt and one of the most high haute couture names in Egypt and this is only a definition about their work. There are already many references added and there will be more added soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maison Saédi (talk • contribs) 14:17, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I created this page and copied the text from existing page Building and Engineering Services Association because the association recently changed its name, removing the "and". It's acronym "B&ES" also changed to "BESA". This has been documented in industry press http://www.coolingpost.com/uk-news/bes-becomes-besa/

The Association has been around since 1904 and is a key part of the specialist contractor sector in the UK.

So why have you marked the page for deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sourswoken (talk • contribs) 08:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contagious Reverie Issue...

Greetings dear Sir. I am writing to you concerning Contagious Reverie page which was in process of development and editing. Some people already contacted me that they are really surprised that the page appeared to be deleted and I would like to work on it further because it is an accurate information about accurate team working on vivid projects - internationally. Moreover representatives of the team are pretty much recognised in artistic circles (especially in Ukraine and Poland).

If you might, I would be grateful for 'not deleting this page'

Looking forward to reading from you... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dante-Heks-01 (talk • contribs) 11:33, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My amends, but could you clarify what you meant by 'conflict of interests'? And What exactly is inappropriate with this page? Information is actual with links + if you will type in google 'Contagious Reverie' or namer of team members you will find a lot of informations (In magazines which I have mentioned as well). A lot of people (fans) recognise the brand and they cannot get why it is so troublesome to create an article.

Could you be so kind and to provide me with possibilities, which are available to finish the creation process of the page and to make it fully valid?

Best regards... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dante-Heks-01 (talk • contribs) 12:16, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:King Price.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good Afternoon! I recently was trying to post an article about Julian Frank Rouas, and it has been marked by you for a speedy deletion. The thing is I am new here, and guidelines of wiki are so confusing for a new comer. I would really appreciate any advises, or how could we make an article? Is that possible to collaborate with you by any chance? Thank you in advance and best regards! OlgaLev (talk) 04:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)OlgaLev[reply]

While I think that an article in mainspace should meet the notability and other requirements immediately, that is not the current policy. I note that you tagged Norman_Dott only five minutes after the first edit. I urge you to watch this and give it at least an hour to see if it can be improved before tagging it.--S Philbrick(Talk) 16:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Have just become a new editor and had only just got started on this page, with a view to completing in time. But delete if you wish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anniepedia57 (talk • contribs) 09:04, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've declined your speedy as A7 is not appropriate there. A7 is only for people, groups of people or organisations, named animals, organised events and web content. Page Curation puts db-significance on the edit window, and I think some people take this to be general significance, not the limited range of things that do come under A7. BTW even though they are groups of people or organisations, educational establishments are not in the scope of A7. This article is about a game on paper. I've retagged it A11 - things made up one day. It's just short for me of being a G3 blatant hoax. Peridon (talk) 19:04, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jasvir Singh(kabaddi), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asiad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:14, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Future Market Insights has been awarded the 'Brand of the Year: Market Research Solutions' award by SiliconIndia Magazine in January 2016 (http://www.siliconindia.com/magazine-articles-in/Future_Market_Insights_Not_Just_Service_But_a_True_Solution_Pr...-AKME251420269.html). FMI's findings have also prompted non-profit and independent studies, for instance, the Information Systems Audit and Control Association initiated research into mobile payments and the risk associated with them http://www.isaca.org/pages/mobile-payment-security-study.aspx.

FMI caters to the top 50 of Fortune 100 companies such as Siemens, GE, and Nestle, establishing it as a global leader in the field of market research. We haven't mentioned it in the Wiki page because we want it to remain non-promotional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pandita.rahul123 (talk • contribs) 12:05, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kavdiamanju. You have concerns regarding Future Market Insights' notability. SiliconIndia, one of the most prestigious business magazines looked at several market research companies, and chose us for their prestigious "Brand of the Year in Market Research Solutions" category. The findings of our research are used by policy makers, not-for-profit organizations, Fortune 100 companies for making critical decisions. The references I have included in the page are from authoritative sources - websites that readers trust in their personal and professional lives.

So request you to please reconsider your decision of speedy deletion and suggest appropriate changes. Look to work with you on this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pandita.rahul123 (talk • contribs) 13:31, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review of Arcade City. I wonder if you could help just a bit more by fact-tagging {fact} any specific statements that you believe are not adequately supported by the existing sources. I think individual area specific tags would help a bit better than the article-level tag you added. Cheers. N2e (talk) 17:46, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think you were a little hasty in tagging this article as A7 only four minutes after its creation, particularly when the article already contained a clear claim of significance. Based on some brief Googling I think it's more likely than not that the subject will be found to be notable, but it's possible that the article creator (who is a new editor) will have been scared off permanently by your aggressive tagging. Thparkth (talk) 15:49, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of entry, Bruce Appleyard. Kavdiamanju, I'm in the middle of working on the article. Is there a way to save it without publishing it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lindismith (talk • contribs) 19:17, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kavdiamanju, thanks for your concern regarding the creation of the DevOps toolchain. However, It clearly meets Wikipedia:Notability standards and doesn't contain a drop of Wikipedia:Vandalism. Please review Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging other pages for deletion, as per your talk page your have repeatedly tagged pages in error. Cheers! Kharnagy (talk) 19:23, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain why you think this is vandalism, and warrants speedy deletion? Andy Dingley (talk) 19:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let's discuss this on the AFD of DevOps toolchain page. Kavdiamanju (talk) 19:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Then maybe ANI, and we can talk topic bans. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Esquivalience. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Franziska Maichle, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Esquivalience ^t 22:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To Whom It May Concern: I just edited https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SwordPen_Publishers page on Wiki, which has been marked for speedy deletion. SwordPen is a publishing company, and there is absolutely credible indication as to its importance and existence. Please leave me a message so that I can get the speedy deletion box taken off. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Williamtellem (talk • contribs) 17:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ma'am the subject is important because its all about no spamming or anti spamming emailing. Octane.In is an Digital Marketing company and there is absolute credible indication as to its importance and existence. Please remove the speedy deletion tag from my article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grumpy22 (talk • contribs) 05:00, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thanks for your advice on my article about Dmitri Kharzeev!

I have added the references to sources, external links, and references to other wiki articles. Also, as the article was an orphan, I activated the link to my article from the wiki article Humboldt Prize.

Could you please review the new version of the article and advise on further improvements, if necessary? LAtoLI (talk) 04:36, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kavdiamanju, is not our intention to promote Abriendo Mentes. Just we think it would be good that was in Wikipedia, a supposedly free encyclopedia, where there are another nonprofits available. We are small but no less important, again, do not intend to promote anything just share information. I am at your disposal if we can adapt the page to the needs of Wikipedia. We know that our site and social networks are for promote. Can we keep the page please? Thanks in advance, have a nice day. Rmontala. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmontala (talk • contribs) 17:58, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I need help on Stanbridge academy page. I want to link to the website and youtube channel. Can you help me? Dingodogedino (talk) 20:44, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Created a Temp Article for review at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:UiPath/Temp Also trying to ping editor Justlettersandnumbers here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:UiPath Am new here. Could you please help me with lifting the copyright infringement warning? thanks! RoboticRPA (talk) 09:16, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can I get Gustav Magnusson restored to draft space? The AfD is here--Prisencolin (talk) 21:54, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You had flagged my page for deletion about a month ago. I've been working on it in draft space and feel that I got it to a really good place with references to back most of it. Working on the references today. Also, modeled it and the information after a few other existing wiki pages, applied mind and IDEO that are in a similar realm as leaders. Let me know if you think the article is better before I re-submit or if you have any other suggestions. Thank you. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:RL_LeadersEvaki1972 (talk) 23:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]