Esquivalience (talk | contribs) cssify and experience |
Copy edit for consistency: Moved banners below the greeting. Added missing nominator introduction. Emphasize the good article criteria. Correct the time frame. |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%;" |
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%;" |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|} |
|} |
||
| ⚫ | [[Image:GA candidate.svg|left|64px]] <center>'''Good articles''' are articles that have been evaluated by an uninvolved editor against a minimum standard of quality. This standard is less than [[WP:Featured articles|featured articles]]. Here, potential Good articles are nominated for review against the [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|good article criteria]]. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | [[Image:GA candidate.svg|left|64px]] <center>'''Good articles''' are articles that have been evaluated by an uninvolved editor against a minimum standard of quality. This standard is less than [[WP:Featured articles|featured articles]]. Here, potential Good articles are nominated for review against the [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria| |
||
Anyone may '''nominate''' an article, and any uninvolved and registered user with sufficient knowledge and experience with Wikipedia content policies may '''review''' an article nominated at this page against the good article criteria. A responsive nominator and reviewer can complete a review in about seven days. Nominators should respond positively to constructive criticism and work with the reviewer to improve the article (if there are any issues) to good article status. If the article is promoted, a small plus sign inside a circle ([[File:Symbol support vote.svg|15px|This symbol designates good articles on Wikipedia.]]) will appear on the top right corner of the article's page indicating that the article has been deemed Good by the reviewer. Instructions on the reviewing and nominating process can be found by clicking the "Instruction" tab above. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
There are currently '''{{GAN counter|Nom}}''' nominations listed and '''{{GAN counter|Wait}}''' waiting to be reviewed.</center> |
There are currently '''{{GAN counter|Nom}}''' nominations listed and '''{{GAN counter|Wait}}''' waiting to be reviewed.</center> |
||
<br/> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
{{Wikipedia:Good article nominations/guidelines header}} |
{{Wikipedia:Good article nominations/guidelines header}} |
||
Revision as of 06:05, 26 February 2016
| Main | Criteria | Instructions | Nominations | Backlog drives | Mentorship | Review circles | Discussion | Reassessment | Report |
Anyone may nominate an article, and any uninvolved and registered user with sufficient knowledge and experience with Wikipedia content policies may review an article nominated at this page against the good article criteria. A responsive nominator and reviewer can complete a review in about seven days. Nominators should respond positively to constructive criticism and work with the reviewer to improve the article (if there are any issues) to good article status. If the article is promoted, a small plus sign inside a circle (
) will appear on the top right corner of the article's page indicating that the article has been deemed Good by the reviewer. Instructions on the reviewing and nominating process can be found by clicking the "Instruction" tab above.
If you need to nominate an article for delisting from good article status, please click the "Reassessment" tab above.
There are currently 604 nominations listed and 510 waiting to be reviewed.
| This page has a backlog that requires the attention of willing reviewers. You can help! |
| The oldest unreviewed good article nominations are:
Paul George | start review) • Frank Butler (American football) | start review) • Jug Bennett | start review) • Hal Hinte | start review) • Wuert Engelmann | start review) |
| The highest priority unreviewed good article nominations are:
Paul George • Frank Butler (American football) • Aérospatiale SA 330 Puma • Arrangement of lines • Line of Duty series 3 |
|
List of good articles nominations, arranged by topic Engineering and technology Geography and places History Mathematics and mathematicians Media and drama Music Natural sciences Social sciences and society |