m Protected "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Involuntary celibacy (4th nomination)": Because of socking in the previous AfD ([Edit=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (indefinite)) |
Andrew Davidson (talk | contribs) sk |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
*{{reply to|Technomad|LaMona|CorporateM|Casliber}} <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 11:33, 29 December 2015 (UTC) |
*{{reply to|Technomad|LaMona|CorporateM|Casliber}} <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 11:33, 29 December 2015 (UTC) |
||
{{hab}} |
{{hab}} |
||
*'''Speedy Keep''' The topic is clearly notable as ''[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=whs0eudAfJIC&pg=PA303 A History of Celibacy]'' has an entire chapter about involuntary celibacy which details various ways that this might arise; for example, young women might be forbidden to marry before their older sisters or apprentices might be forbidden to marry until they mastered their trade. The nomination does not provide any particular reason to delete this notable topic and so the discussion should be speedily closed per [[WP:SK]] "''The nominator ... fails to advance an argument for deletion''" and [[WP:DELAFD]], "''It can be disruptive to repeatedly nominate a page in the hope of getting a different outcome.''" Pinging all the contributors to previous discussions pretty much guarantees a rerun of everything which has been said before. [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew D.]] ([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 11:43, 29 December 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:43, 29 December 2015
- Involuntary celibacy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article, whose suitability as an article topic is contested for various reasons, is again relisted following discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 December 21. This is a procedural nomination, I am neutral.
To help the closing admin find a hopefully lasting consensus, please do not only "vote" for deletion or keeping, but express a clear preference (together with an explanation based on Wikipedia policies and guidelines) about whether, how and at which depth you would like the content associated with this topic, including the supposed "incel" subculture, to be covered on Wikipedia: whether as one or more standalone articles (with which titles?), or as part of other (which?) articles. Please also take note of the previous discussions listed here. Sandstein 11:19, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep The topic is clearly notable as A History of Celibacy has an entire chapter about involuntary celibacy which details various ways that this might arise; for example, young women might be forbidden to marry before their older sisters or apprentices might be forbidden to marry until they mastered their trade. The nomination does not provide any particular reason to delete this notable topic and so the discussion should be speedily closed per WP:SK "The nominator ... fails to advance an argument for deletion" and WP:DELAFD, "It can be disruptive to repeatedly nominate a page in the hope of getting a different outcome." Pinging all the contributors to previous discussions pretty much guarantees a rerun of everything which has been said before. Andrew D. (talk) 11:43, 29 December 2015 (UTC)