Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Zanimum (talk | contribs)
John (talk | contribs)
Aeroplane pictures
Line 127: Line 127:


When I thanked the newspaper for referencing us in the article, the reporter replied that Phil Austin, at cloud physicist at [[University of British Columbia]] (who was quoted in the story), thought this was a good explaination of the topic. Thumbs up, everyone who worked on this! -- [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] 17:12, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
When I thanked the newspaper for referencing us in the article, the reporter replied that Phil Austin, at cloud physicist at [[University of British Columbia]] (who was quoted in the story), thought this was a good explaination of the topic. Thumbs up, everyone who worked on this! -- [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] 17:12, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

==Aeroplane pictures==
Hi. I'm a great admirer of your photos and see you at Featured Pictures quite a lot. I'd be interested if you could review my picture gallery, especially [[:Image:TornadoTakeoffJM.jpg]] and see if you think any of them might be eligible for FP status. Be as critical as you like, I am looking for honest feedback here. Thanks. --[[User:Guinnog|Guinnog]] 11:13, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:13, 4 August 2006

Cracked windscreen

Just out of sheer curiosity, after you removed it from the SAA article — is a cracked windscreen that common to not be an 'incident'? I'd have imagined otherwise, or are the fail-safes good enough? Thanks, dewet| 15:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I removed it simply because a cracked windscreen is not important enought to feature in an encyclopedia. I'm not saying it's unimportant to the airline or the passengers, I'm only saying we need not feature such incidents in WP. I would guess every airline has had such things happen so we'd have a cracked windsereen or a burst tyre entry for every airline. We keep the Incidents heading for much more serious stuff. Thanks for asking - Adrian Pingstone 15:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have no problem with the removal; as I said this was for my own curiousity. You seem knowledgeable about the airline industry, which is why I posed my question to you. I was just wondering whether it is actually just trivial, or indeed a common serious occurence? The same for burst tyres. dewet| 15:55, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I worked on Airbus A320, A330 and A340 wing design at BAe as an aerodynamicist but I'm in no way connected with airline matters, just interested. So, sorry, I can't help you. Best Wishes - Adrian Pingstone 14:26, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Diyarbakir

A recent user edit on the Diyarbakir page removed most of the pictures that had been there and replaced them with new ones. I don't think some of the new ones are of the same quality as the old ones (some are low quality scans) but don't want to "be bold" as I uploaded most of the earlier ones and may be biased. Your Solomon's judgement would be appreciated. Old piccies are viewable at [1] Gerry Lynch 21:04, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Hi, hoping you can offer some advice. I puchased (from an aviation collector's estate) an original black and white photo of a Miles Whitney Straight, which I thought would be good to illustrate both that article, and the history of Aerial Topdressing. The problem is potential copyright. On the back is the stamp of Whites Aviation, (but no assertion of copyright). Whites aviation is a firm which came into existence after the (apparently pre war) photo appears to have been taken. Leo White was airplane buff and used to collect photos himself, and the estate included several hundred of his photos. I contacted the successor firm, sending a copy of the photo, and asking them if they owned copyright. Twice. 6 months ago. I have heard nothing back.

Would I be safe to put the image on Wikipedia?Winstonwolfe 00:25, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to answer anyhow, enoyoy the break :-)Winstonwolfe 04:25, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Could you please clarify the copyright status of this image? Conscious 10:15, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Wishing you all the best on your birthday! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee.

Enjoy!!!

Thistheman 04:51, 5 July 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Just a happy Birthday message to you, Arpingstone, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Have a good one :) -Ladybirdintheuk 06:30, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Here's to you on your birthday, Arpingstone! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Enjoy! Mr. Turcottetalk 17:16, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much, the birthday greetings are highly appreciated - Adrian Pingstone 20:40, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday, Arpingstone! -- preschooler@heart 23:05, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for editing my entry. A quick note, though. I assume you removed "massive amount" because it sounded POV. Do you have an idea for alternative wording that indicates the amount of messages without removing it entirely? Also, I think your rewrite has a stray comma introducing a clause that isn't actually a clause. I'll go chance that last bit. Please answer on my talk page. - Mgm|(talk) 15:52, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Afriqiyah Airways

I recently uploaded this image from the German Wikipedia. On the German wikipedia, the license had the letter 'c' in grey with a strike through. I didn't know what that corresponded to in the english one. Could you please check it out in the German Wikipedia and apply a suitable license tag.

Thanks for the fix

Image:Afriaqua.jpg

--Jaw101ie 14:06, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strausbaugh article

Thank you for cleaning up this page! It had been massacred and looked terrible. Nice to have somebody with an EYE around! --ITech 21:19, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your nice comment is appreciated. Thanks - Adrian Pingstone 05:40, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Photo related proposal

Hi Adrian, I thought you might be interested in my proposal for a Bristol WikiProject photo challenge/contest thing. Joe D (t) 03:50, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I don't want to be "challenged" in my retirement (please imagine a smiley here) but thanks anyway for asking - Adrian Pingstone 05:40, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Adrian: I apologize for my bad manners. I am fairly new to editing others' work and you have taught me a valuable lesson. Thank you! User:Argos'Dad

Thank you for such a graceful apology, fully accepted of course. Best Wishes - Adrian Pingstone 22:14, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! My name is Zoltán Szőke. I work for the National Archives of Hungary (former ICCS member state!!!). I wrote my M.A. thesis on the ICCS (dealing mainly with the "controversial" role of the Hungarian delegation...) According to tens of thousands of primary archival sources there was an "of" in the commission’s name instead of a "for". It should be changed in the title of the article, too. I just couldn’t find out how. I'll be back later with more.

I'm not sure what you'd like me to do for you but whatever it is it's unlikely I can help. I merely edited the article to make it better. My normal activity is adding pictures to articles so I don't how to rename an article. It wouild be best to go to the Help Desk here and type your question in - Adrian Pingstone 15:47, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for the reaction. Furthermore see Wikipedia:Help desk--Jaak Nijssen 10:45, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just read"Adrian: I apologize for my bad manners." - so: I sincerely apologize for my bad manners.

In my article, the first step is now made. Thank you for the help.

The second filling in of the planned work is coming soon--Jaak Nijssen 10:45, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your apologies. I'm sure the article will become a good one as more material is added. Best Wishes - Adrian Pingstone 16:05, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your peccary image

Since your photograph of the peccary was released in the public domain, I thought it would be an excellent candidate to accompany the main page of my new animal short fiction magazine (still in the works). Just so you know. :) Here's the link. - Mgm|(talk) 19:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for using my peccary pic. As you will have noticed the focus is very poor on the bigger pic, but luckily the thumbnmail looks reasonable. Best Wishes - Adrian Pingstone 09:08, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Funnel

You get funnels on ships; never on steam engines. — Dunc| 18:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that, thanks - Adrian Pingstone 08:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You supported the Hummingbird Hawk-moth FPC (like everyone else who commented), but HighInBC uploaded an edit that absolutely no-one commented on. I can't promote the image without knowing which version to promote, so now I have to ask everyone which version they prefer. Would you mind specifying which image you are supporting? Thanks. Raven4x4x 09:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done (support either) - Adrian Pingstone 10:19, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Contrails referenced in newspaper

Note that I originally just posted this to talk:contrails, but saw your name repeated in the edit history, though it might be of interest to you.

Some people theorize vapour trails are chemical or biological agents being secretly released in the air, says Wikipedia, an Internet encyclopedia. Chemtrails refer to systematic, high-altitude dumping of unknown substances for some undisclosed purpose. Theories proposed for their purpose include atmospheric and weather modification, biological warfare, mind control and military uses. -- Kerry Hall's "Contrails: a problem all their own", Parksville Qualicum News

When I thanked the newspaper for referencing us in the article, the reporter replied that Phil Austin, at cloud physicist at University of British Columbia (who was quoted in the story), thought this was a good explaination of the topic. Thumbs up, everyone who worked on this! -- Zanimum 17:12, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aeroplane pictures

Hi. I'm a great admirer of your photos and see you at Featured Pictures quite a lot. I'd be interested if you could review my picture gallery, especially Image:TornadoTakeoffJM.jpg and see if you think any of them might be eligible for FP status. Be as critical as you like, I am looking for honest feedback here. Thanks. --Guinnog 11:13, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply