Hello! Pirhayati, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! heather walls (talk) 03:40, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are and we thank you for it! Thank you for your feedback and thank you for your contributions! For more help on getting started, please look at Help desk and the help pages.

If you need help editing,

• Check out the tutorial.
• Wanting to create an article? Use the article wizard.
• See the manual.

Cheers,
Riley Huntley _talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 07:34, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Crapulence. Since you had some involvement with the Crapulence redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:25, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bijan Abdolkarimi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 15:21, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello علی پیرحیاتی

I see that you are requesting to have the article on Bijan Abdolkarimi relisted. Might I suggest that you request to have it moved to your userspace instead? If that happened, then you could add the required notability information, then submit it for review as a potential new article. You can find a list of admins who will userfy your article here. If you have any questions, please feel free to post them at the Teahouse or on my userpage. Cheers, Ebikeguy (talk) 16:17, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. In fact, I know these regulations and I have more than 14000 edits in Persian Wikipedia. The problem is that most of the sources about this person are in Persian. So, a person who knows Persian, should consider his notability. Anyway, I request userfication. --Ali Pirhayati (talk) 17:56, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll shortly post the deleted text here The problem wasn't that the references were in Persian, it's that the article didn't explain why he is notable.

• We have a one paragraph spammy start — who says he is prominent?
• We have an OR list of his supposed views, without a single in-line reference to support it
• We have a list of his book, which for all I know have sold one copy each

You are an experienced editor, so you know the importance of in-line citations, especially in biographies of living people, and especially when you are claiming to know his views. He may well be notable, but the article as it stood didn't tell us why and didn't properly reference the claimed text. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:05, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I edited the page and add some in-line references. May you reconsider it?Ali Pirhayati (talk) 19:10, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, obviously much better with the refs. I tidied a bit, including removing "distinguished", which looks spammy, otherwise mainly MoS, link to Heidegger etc.

• Two of your "views" appear to have inadvertently rolled into one. I've separated them, but that leaves the third bullet point unreffed. Obviously you will need to fix that.
• I think there is still some doubt about whether he meets WP:Notability (academics). He appears to be an academic doing what academics do, and writing a few books. Obviously I'm handicapped by not being able to read Persian.
• Once you have added the missing "views" ref, I'd suggest that you move it into article space. It won't be eligible for speedy deletion since it has refs and isn't spammy. It's possible that it might be tagged for notability, but there's only one way to find out!

Good luck Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:10, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Darren Jonusas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. §FreeRangeFrog 22:53, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Skrelk. علی پیرحیاتی, thanks for creating Sayyed Mohsen Fatemi!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. More sources are needed to show notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. —Preceding undated comment added 09:34, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark Changizi, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rensselaer, See and Feel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:22, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pirhayati, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Formal sociology, appears to be directly copied from http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110503055551AAWNBUW. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Formal sociology if necessary.Template:Z120 MadmanBot (talk) 00:38, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Formal sociology, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Integration, Inequality and Approach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Tooley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Causation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:07, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Otto Pöggeler, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages German and Phenomenology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Foulquié is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Foulquié until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 10:53, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Being in the World, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phenomenology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Big Bang Theory (season 7), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Topless (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adriaan Theodoor Peperzak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catholic University of Louvain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Author reading has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary, but rather an encyclopedia about notable topics.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cindy(talk) 19:11, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

However, there is a small issue with your username. As it is in a non-Latin alphabet script it may not display correctly for many other users. Although usernames like yours are not prohibited, Wikipedia's signature guideline and username policy encourage you, as a courtesy to other users, to alter your signature so that it also includes a translation of your username using Latin characters, so others can see it correctly. For the how-to of tailoring your username, please see WP:CUSTOMSIG.

Thanks, and feel free to message me about anything. --Frze ^{> talk} 11:55, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message, but my signature is Latin (Ali Pirhayati). --Ali Pirhayati (talk) 12:48, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, علی پیرحیاتی. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Rahnama, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Rahnama to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Lemonmelonsuperstar (talk) 11:35, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ali Rahnema, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iranian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of James Giles (philosopher), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.james-giles.com/bio.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)Template:Z119 MadmanBot (talk) 05:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article James Giles (philosopher) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

insufficient notability for WP:Academic; highest Scholar cites appear to be 24.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:12, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Giles (philosopher) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Giles (philosopher) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to James Giles (philosopher) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Fathali M. Moghaddam, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://explore.georgetown.edu/news/?ID=1961, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Fathali M. Moghaddam and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Fathali M. Moghaddam, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Fathali M. Moghaddam with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Fathali M. Moghaddam. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Fathali M. Moghaddam saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Carl Raschke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://web.archive.org/web/20130531061043/http://carlraschke.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:06, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Carl Raschke has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, علی پیرحیاتی. As you know, some copyright issues were flagged recently with some of your contributions. Unfortunately, on closer evaluation, it seems that you may have had a previously undiscovered habit of copying content from your sources. It seems obvious to me that you were working on good faith, as you have cited every source that I've yet found, but unfortunately this is simply not something we can do on Wikipedia. It is very unusual for a source to be free for copying in that way.

I have had to remove content from several articles you created and have listed your contributions for a "contributor copyright investigation" (CCI) so that they can be evaluated against our copyright policies. The intention of a CCI is simply to address outstanding copyright issues. You can help by reviewing the articles yourself and proactively removing or rewriting any copied content that you find. The listing is here: Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20140301. If you address a copyright issue in any article, please feel free to make a note beneath the listing. Something like this would work: :Problem addressed. --~~~~

The article will still need to be reviewed by somebody else, but it will both help reviewers and demonstrate your improved understanding of our copyright policies. To that end, I would recommend reading Wikipedia:Copy-paste as well as the policies and guidelines to which it links.

If you have any questions, please let me know. If you add User:Moonriddengirl to your note, I will be alerted that it is here, which will help me avoid inadvertently overlooking it. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:04, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

I've just noticed that on March 19, you created the article Moral intellectualism by copying substantial content from the article Intellectualism. While it is permissible to copy content from one article to another, content on Wikipedia is not public domain and the terms of the license must be met. Unless you meet these terms, this copying is as much a copyright problem as copying content from sites that are not compatibly licensed.

The way to meet the licensing term on Wikipedia is to give credit for the copying at minimum in edit summary and often also on the talk page. This is a required step. I have provided the attribution at Moral intellectualism to resolve the copyright problem there. If you wish to move content from one page to another, or from one project to another, in future, please be sure to follow those necessary steps. You can read more about how to do them and why at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 10:54, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello علی پیرحیاتی,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Stone (blog) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:34, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rosalyn Diprose, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Embodiment and Phenomenology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of common cold drugs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of common cold drugs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:15, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Achard of St. Victor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bernard McGinn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mohammad Ilkhani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SAMT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Redamancy. Since you had some involvement with the Redamancy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 20:09, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Download ebooks. Since you had some involvement with the Download ebooks redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 02:26, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Downloading ebooks. Since you had some involvement with the Downloading ebooks redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 02:27, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Having children. Since you had some involvement with the Having children redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 02:31, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]