You bonehead Jamies Winston

We organize these list by letter per WP:Manual of Style/Lists#Organization. If you still disagree and would like to use the more complex form of organization by organizing it by have new shows at the end. Don't edit war over it, use dispute resolution by discussing it on the talk page. Powergate92Talk 05:58, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GalaxyFighter55, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Nicktoons does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm writing regarding this edit, and specifically your condescending edit summary, "And do you have a source for why it shouldn't be on there? I know more about shows than you, and I know my proof is solid." It appears that you are citing your personal knowledge as a source, which you might not be intending to do, as that would run afoul of Wikipedia's policies against original research. Whether or not you are correct, and whether or not you "know more about shows" than I do, doesn't make your original research worthy of inclusion, because nobody can go to the library and access your brain in the reference section. Further, there is no burden on me to prove why something should NOT be there. The burden is on you, the person adding the information, to establish why it should be there, per WP:BURDEN. Now to help put things into perspective, the article, and Nickelodeon-related articles in general, are lightning rods for vandalism and incorrect information. Last week, a user went through a number of Nick articles and added Nicktoons indiscriminately at Sheen, Barnyard, OddParents, Penguins, Korra, etc. That having been said, without a source, expect to see that information deleted, if not by me, then by another editor. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:56, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NFL Rush Zone: Guardians of the Core, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryan Mathews (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NFL Rush Zone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryan Mathews (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GalaxyFighter55, I noticed some of your recent edits to List of programs broadcast by Nicktoons, including this one where you move TUFF Puppy around and then ascribe an end date to the series, even though no series end date has been provided by a reliable source. The WikiProject Television community doesn't look favorable upon these sorts of edits, as they look like squirrely ways to circumvent sourcing requirements. If you have an explanation, I'd be interested in hearing it. Otherwise, I think you should revert the edits that contravene Wikipedia policy. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:33, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyraachur (talk • contribs) 14:45, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyraachur (talk • contribs) 16:35, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to say this at ANI but someone closed the discussion and I don't really see a point in opening it. But if I didn't count wrong, both of you had 5 reverts in 24 hours. Not a good look whatever other problems may exist. Considering you're already both well over the WP:3RR line you both need to stop right now or expect to be mutually blocked. Nil Einne (talk) 17:14, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Haven't you seen the posts? I gave up on him. You need to look into stuff before posting on my wall about something that's over. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GalaxyFighter55 (talk • contribs) 17:34, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know or care about what posts you're referring to since it's besides my main point. As I made clear in my response, I crafted it for ANI but that discussion was correctly closed and I didn't see any point reopening nor in rephrasing my comment to make it more suited for posting to your talk page other than the intro. But even so, it was still important enough for both of you to read because it directly concerned behavior from both of you which was clearly unacceptable. Even if this case is really over, the fact that you went so far over the 3RR suggests either you don't understand 3RR or don't care. Either way, you should expect to earn a block if you ever do that again in the future anywhere on wikipedia. If you don't want to take on board such advice because it doesn't directly apply to your specific current circumstances, it's going to be your loss in the future. Nil Einne (talk) 17:51, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Digimon Fusion (season 1) page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to NickMom may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | adsl serv 7 = [[Cablelink]]<br/>(Philippines

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:35, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of Robot and Monster episodes, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please note that nickandmore.com is not a reliable source and cannot be used as a reference - See Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/FAQ and discussions at WP:RSN AussieLegend (✉) 09:23, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NFL Rush Zone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greg Olsen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GalaxyFighter55! I saw your recent edits to Yu-Gi-Oh! and thought you may want to join WP:YGO if you're interested. TF ^{{ Contribs }} 18:23, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Criticism of ESPN, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Sherman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brian Leonard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fullback (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Cleveland Browns. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Name calling...really? Vjmlhds 23:28, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

What is your problem already?

Vjmlhds (talk) 00:30, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You just should have done that to start with, instead of calling me a fool...stuff like that can get you blocked. Truthfully, I thought you were just causing trouble, which is why I reverted. If you would have came right out with your reference, it wouldn't have gotten this far. Vjmlhds (talk) 01:10, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 NFL season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malcolm Butler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just because there is white on the uniforms, doesn't mean that it is an "official color". If it was an OFFICIAL color, then it would be listed in the "colors" section. Since it is NOT listed in the colors section, it is NOT an OFFICIAL color for the team. Please do not revert again. Also, please do NOT attack me by calling me blind when I have 20/20 vision. You've been warned once before, so let this be your newest warning. If you do it again, I will report you. Corky | Chat? 16:45, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What are you, a child? Reporting for that? White is in ALL road uniforms. If your going to be offended as a simple blind reply, I'd hate to be your friend.

Hello, I'm Bagumba. Your recent edit to the page New Orleans Pelicans appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so I have removed it for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 03:13, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Seattle shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Color boxes generally don't belong outside of infoboxes. SounderBruce 04:21, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I reverted your recent edits related to NBA teams. My reason was - Revert - season still in progress until ALL awards are handed out. We then change the link to the next season. You can change the current season dates again after 2015 NBA Finals are over and all the remaining awards for the 2014–15 NBA season are handed out. Sabbatino (talk) 08:15, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Get off my talk page and leave me alone.

STOP EDITING according to your own taste. Or do you want to be reported and blocked for some time? You don't cite any reason for your edits and that's not how Wikipedia works. Furthermore, insulting other users when they don't agree with your opinion, just gives other editors a bigger reason to report you. Sabbatino (talk) 08:57, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you changed the Philadelphia 76ers article to 2014-15 season when it IS the offseason now. Finals are done, awards are given out. Also you changed it the order of red and blue. Who cares about what order the colors red and blue are in in an article about a basketball team? Please stop. ThatKongregateGuy (talk) 20:03, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]