RE this, you may prefer that layout but you won't find many, if any, article like that at all. HalfGig talk 18:12, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know. And I think it's a shame, HalfGig. Best. Biosthmors (talk) pls notify me (i.e. {{U}}) while signing a reply, thx 18:19, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think the current Marasmius siccus layout is easy on the eyes, FWIW. Biosthmors (talk) pls notify me (i.e. {{U}}) while signing a reply, thx 19:23, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, it is not easy on the eyes and I'm pretty sure most of the community would agree with me. This is an encyclopedia, none flickr. Look at all the FAs on shrooms, not look like that. I also see no reason to get into a royal boil over it. HalfGig talk 19:49, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

did you/someone you know try the challenge to get those photos? (since you say own work) Gaijin42 (talk) 15:52, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

yes. Biosthmors (talk) pls notify me (i.e. {{U}}) while signing a reply, thx 18:49, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amanda Anka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Anka until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:17, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-weaked the article to match wiki plants method of style - includes a lead paragraphDavidAnstiss (talk) 14:30, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's great. Thanks again for your contributions DavidAnstiss. I'll have to upload a picture I recently took of Iris fulva. The only other thing I'd mention about your style that I think can be improved upon is to avoid wp:citation clutter. The article I have worked on most extensively is deep vein thrombosis (keep active to prevent DVT! =) — blood flow through the calves helps prevent blood clots). You'll notice there that I never have more than two inline citations at a time. That's my preferred method. Thanks again. Biosthmors (talk) pls notify me (i.e. {{U}}) while signing a reply, thx 16:13, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion of material from the lede here on the basis of your POV that it is not good for the lede is belied by wp:lede. This is perfectly appropriate for a lede. The lede serves as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important aspects. Of course, this -- which bears on motive -- is one of its most important aspects. --Epeefleche (talk) 07:42, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]