Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present.

That picture from 1958 with the hula hoop and girl. The girl looks lots like me, do you know who the girl is?? http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/98/Girl_twirling_Hula_Hoop%2C_1958.jpg

Evesw (talk) 18:48, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

for your comments on SPA. I have added some info to my user page that may be helpful User:Melmn

Hello. Kindly look into the revisions in the article Chaitanya Giri. I have cited a couple of references in the article´s text that include the name Chaitanya Giri. I hope the article now meets your suggested norms. (talk) Chaitanya Giri 13:44, 19 December 2012 (CET)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Frank Vandersloot, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. (Re: repeated removal of multi-level marketing from the article)

Your upload of File:BrickAtTable.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:11, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Coalinga house.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:49, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Coalinga High School.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:51, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LA Meetup: March 9 edit-a-thon at MOCA

Dear fellow Wikipedian, You have been invited to a meetup and edit-a-thon at the Museum of Contemporary Art in downtown Los Angeles on Sunday, March 9, 2014 from 11 am to 6 pm! This event is in collaboration with MOCA and the arts collective East of Borneo and aims to improve coverage of LA art since the 1980s. (Even if contemporary art isn't your thing, you're welcome to join too!) Please RSVP here if you're interested. I hope to see you there! User:Calliopejen1 (talk) To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

Talk:Tarzana,_Los_Angeles#.22Zoned.22_schools WhisperToMe (talk) 09:44, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LA Meetup: May 10 Asian Pacific American edit-a-thon

Dear fellow Wikipedian, You have been invited to a meetup and edit-a-thon at the Junipero Serra Branch of the LA Public Library (4607 S. Main St., 90037) on Saturday, May 10, 2014 from 10 am to 4 pm! This event is sponsored by the Smithsonian Asian Pacific American Center and the Asian Pacific American Librarians Association and aims to improve coverage of Asian Pacific American topics, particularly as they relate to southern California. Please RSVP here if you're interested. I hope to see you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:11, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply] To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

Hi GeorgeLouis,

Thanks for your help on the CipherCloud page. I moved the DCMA take-down notice material up to the "History" section. In the move, I removed the Wired magazine sentence for the paragraph, as it is used as the source for supporting the section. This was my edit: "In April 2013, CipherCloud filed a Digital Millennium Copyright Act takedown notice against Stack Exchange Network for posting a discussion titled "How is CipherCloud doing homomorphic encryption?", which CipherCloud claimed contained copyrighted marketing material to criticize the company.[13]" Does this work and/or should it be in that section? Thanks for your comments.Jppcap (talk) 23:41, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. I appreciate your work as well. We both seem to be interested in the same kind of article! Anyway, can you re-post this or a similar message on the article's Talk Page at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:CipherCloud because I think there are others also working on this topic. Also you might consider saying WHY you made the changes, even if it just "I think it reads better this way." Yours in Wikidom, GeorgeLouis (talk) 17:30, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Thanks for the advice! Jppcap (talk) 15:28, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BeenAroundAWhile. You have new messages at Talk:Daniel Amen.
Message added 02:58, 12 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks for your work on the article. I think you have generally improved it. Just felt differently about one or two edits. - - MrBill3 (talk) 02:58, 12 May 2014 (UTC) BTW, RE: diff.[reply]

I thought "popular press" was an acceptable expression for magazines and newspapers as opposed to scientific press or trade press. Wouldn't mind hearing what you think is a good way to distinguish various elements of the media. Thanks and happy editing. - - MrBill3 (talk) 07:40, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yes, "popular press" is often used that way, but someone who has never heard that term might be confused, so it would be better to just give the names of the publications, which would avoid any confusion. Yours, GeorgeLouis (talk) 15:56, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LA meetups: Adrianne Wadewitz memorial edit-a-thons on May 23 and May 31

Dear fellow Wikipedian, There are two LA edit-a-thons in memory of Adrianne Wadewitz, a prolific Wikipedia editor, in the coming weeks. Please join us May 23 at Occidental College and May 31 at the Institute of Cultural Inquiry to combat systemic bias and help further Adrianne's legacy. No experience needed! Please RSVP at the relevant page(s) if you plan to attend. I hope to see you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:28, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply] To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carpe Fulgur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carpe Fulgur until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 21:40, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Carpe Fulgur a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Carpe Fulgur. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 08:08, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi George, I think your reversion of all of Salcruz91's edits is unwarranted, as most seem to be correct. Why did you revert them all? Go Phightins! 22:55, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No sources. No edit summaries. How this guy could have done all that research within just a few hours in also suspicious. If I am wrong, I apologize. GeorgeLouis (talk) 00:05, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, he did not respond to notices on his talk page. GeorgeLouis (talk) 00:08, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You should apologize to him ... I double checked some of it, and it looked right. All one would have to do is look at a page of players' statistics. And as for why he didn't respond, he is a brand new editor, and may not know how to use talk pages yet. I would suggest you remove your warnings from his talk page, and maybe politely inform him about edit summaries. Thank you very much, and happy editing! Go Phightins! 00:28, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your hard work. It sure looked like WP:Vandalism to me. Yours, GeorgeLouis (talk) 00:33, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No worries; we all make mistakes from time to time . Go Phightins! 02:08, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BeenAroundAWhile. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:26, 26 May 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to James Ashman may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''James Ashman''' (1848–?} was a 19th-century businessman who was a member of the [[Los Angeles City Council, 1889–1909|Los

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of psychiatrists may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Jill Afrin]] (born 1962), telepsychiatrist]] for deaf people
• *[[Vamık Volkan]] (born 1932, Turkish-Cypriot, political psychiatry

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:31, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to James Potter Davenport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Arthur D. Houghton]].<ref>"Houghton Elected to Council," ''Los Angeles Herald,'' September 17, 1904]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:03, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Meredith P. Snyder may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• s history . . . .<ref>'Los Angeles From A to Z,'' University of California Press (1997), page 472]</ref></blockquote>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:11, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Albert Joseph Wallace may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository[[Wallace was named a member of the [[board of trustees]] of the [[University of Southern California]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:52, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Benjamin Ignatius Hayes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• bar]] today, He is considered by posterity to have been a learned man, with a brilliant legal mind.]<ref name=LAPL/></blockquote>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:28, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:George A. Smith, Los Angeles politician and businessman.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Owen McAleer of Los Angeles and his driving horse, Checkers, in 1905.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You keep doing TOC wrong and I keep fixing... Herman Silver

1. There can be no material between the TOC and first headline per WP:TOC and WP:LEAD. This is an accessibility issue for users of screen readers.
2. For atleast five years, nobody uses {| align="right" to move the TOC to the right. This is what {{TOC right}} is for.
3. TOC should go on the left side unless there is need to be on the right side. A long TOC or on disambig pages are examples where right side is applicable. Per WP:LEAD, "Avoid floating the table of contents if possible, as it breaks the standard look of pages."
4. An image is traditionally on the right side of the article.

They seem to be all on Los Angeles politicians. I've enjoyed reading them. They are all very interesting. Bgwhite (talk) 06:29, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your work and the time it took to do it. don't intend to quarrel with anybody. All I know is that the "standard look of pages," so called, leaves annoying white space in the article. REALLY annoying white space. The relevant guideline states: "The TOC can, in some instances, be floated either right or left using { {TOC right} } or { {TOC left} } when it is beneficial to the layout of the article." That's what I do. It would be really nice if more Wikipedians would add well-sourced CONTENT to the encyclopedia instead of wasting time making unimportant changes to layout. I suggest if anybody wants to make a layout change, well, he should take it to the Talk Page of that article, where the matter can be discussed. It doesn't do morale any good to make unnecessary changes just for the sake of making them. As for images and tradition, well, good typographic layout has always been to have the subject in the image looking INTO the article. That makes sense. GeorgeLouis (talk) 16:41, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please use {{ping}}, {{U}} or similar means when responding people. This is a matter of common courtesy.

It is policy to be able to allow everybody the chance to see all of the material. The policy is you can float the TOC as long as no material comes before the TOC and first heading. Two of the five pillars of Wikipedia covers this. If you want to challenge this, goto ANI and see if you can ignore the five pillars. This has been debated multiple times before and if you want, I can give multiple instances of where this stands. I and other who enforce this have had hundreds revert. They are all shoot down.

The rules of MOS is you follow it unless there is a good reason not to. MOS states do not put TOC on right unless there is good reason. DAB pages are one. A long TOC is another. Bgwhite (talk) 23:18, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Very few editors have ever accused me of lacking courtesy. I don't know what {{ping}}, {{U}} means at all. If anybody talks to me on my page here, that's where I respond. I would certainly like to see the material you have offered me. I believe you are talking about guidelines and not about policy. Nevertheless, just shoot me some links. Yours in wikidom, GeorgeLouis (talk) 03:29, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Please start using {{ping}} or {{U}}. Everybody has been using ping, U and others since notifications came on-line. This is common practice. Since this came into being, nobody now watches other talk pages for a reply unless they are page stalker. In this care, you are lacking courtesy.
• Changing position of TOC by {| align="left" | __TOC__ |} ended atleast 3 years ago and nobody is supposed to use it. Please use {{toc right}} or {{toc left}}.
• From this and other messages, you obviously do not keep up with rule changes and other changes. Things change all the time around here. Nobody can keep up with all the changes, but atleast attempt to.
• I hate anybody that says guidelines isn't policy, so I don't have to follow it. They are usually the same people that turns around and oppose a change saying it is a guideline, we should follow it. A guideline is something ALL editors follow unless for the occasional exceptions. We don't throw it away because we don't believe in it. "Editors should attempt to follow guidelines, though they are best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply. "
• You are choosing page ownership and looks over the ability of people to see all of the article. This is in no way a common sense exception.
• Other messages, This is about a talk we already had on the subject. Hear for other messages. Bgwhite (talk) 07:11, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer positive editing and writing. WP:There are no rules., so how can there be "rule changes"? The reason for that is so the encyclopedia will get improved by innovation. And one editor does not TELL another editor what to do; it is very demoralizing. I don't own any pages, and neither does any one else. As I mentioned before, I don't want to quarrel with anybody, so I shan't. It takes up time that I could be using to create articles. Take this message, for example: I've been agonizing over it for, oh, several minutes now, and it distresses me. I will put my output and quality of editing up against anybody else's. I would rather not continue this conversation: It is troubling. That's my gut feeling, and I hope it is respected. GeorgeLouis (talk) 10:53, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My gosh, you can't teach a dead dog squat. This is about people with screen readers being able to actually read the article. Your page ownership issues and NO RULES issues over the ability of disabled people's rights (yes it is right via five pillars) is very disturbing. You are now going thru articles and reverting changes that I have made to comply with WP:TOC and WP:LEAD. I have shown you where the rules are located. I have shown you where it has been discussed that this is a rule that cannot be broken. I have shown you the leading person on disability issues in Wikipedia has argued this point. Any further reverting and breaking will be dealt with at ANI, where yes, this has also been discussed and blocks threatened if the editor did not stop.

I'm in no way taking issue with "output and quality of editing up against anybody else's". This is not the point and never has been. I've also praised your articles. I'm taking issue with your blatant disregard of allowing everybody to read and edit the entire article that you create. You have now said you don't follow guidelines, policy or the five pillars of Wikipedia with your, "WP:There are no rules., so how can there be "rule changes"?"

It is very demoralizing when somebody thinks this about him. It is very demoralizing when somebody refuses to create an article that EVERYBODY can read and edit. Bgwhite (talk) 06:54, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In Wikipedia we work with consensus and since the consensus is that infoboxes and primary images go on the right we should respect that. The say way we should respect our visitors who use tablets, smartphones, etc. I agree with Bgwhite that ToC should stay in the place it is in all other pages. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 07:04, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. Once there is consensus to remove WP:There are no rules as a WP:policy I might reconsider. In the meantime, "There are no rules." And since a problem has been called to my attention, I always put the TOC immediately after the first paragraph, as requested. So what is the problem? Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 17:57, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• You are not linking the policy page. Page is WP:IAR.
• From Five Pillars, "Wikipedia does not have firm rules: Wikipedia has policies and guidelines, but they are not carved in stone; their content and interpretation can evolve over time. Their principles and spirit matter more than their literal wording, and sometimes improving Wikipedia requires making an exception. Be bold but not reckless in updating articles". (emphasis mine)
• Not allowing a group of readers to see all of the page is reckless and is not an exception.
• You always put the TOC on the left side and photo on the right. This hinders those on tablets, phones and other small devices.
• You never follow WP:TOC and WP:LEAD. For the fourth time, "There can be no material between the TOC and first headline". Bgwhite (talk) 19:36, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• n.b., WP:There are no rules was an essay (in the loosest sense of that term) created by a sock of Fastwaylie. While it might serve as an (unpersuasive) justification for sock puppeteers, it has nothing to do with WP:IAR or enWP policy. I've nominated it for deletion. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 06:16, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Caricature of architect Chauncey Fitch Skilling, 1900.png

Thanks for uploading File:Caricature of architect Chauncey Fitch Skilling, 1900.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:45, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Caricature of architect Chauncey Fitch Skilling, 1900.png

Thanks for uploading File:Caricature of architect Chauncey Fitch Skilling, 1900.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:45, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GeorgeLouis. Just as a quick heads up, the Terms of Use were changed on June 15 to require disclosure from anyone engaged in paid editing. There is room to move in regard to how this is done, as you can do so on the talk page, your user page, or in the edit summaries, but you are required to disclose the employer, client and affiliation. None of this means that there has been any change in whether or not people can edit Wikipedia when being paid, just they they do so openly and in a transparent manner. - Bilby (talk) 16:40, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Charles S. Burnell

added links pointing to Docket, Civil, Lowell High School and University Club

John W. Shenk

added links pointing to Franchise, Commonwealth Club, Union Church and Cobbleskill, New York

Leslie R. Hewitt

added links pointing to Los Angeles Harbor and Los Angeles Express

Jess E. Stephens

added a link pointing to Masons

William Ellsworth Dunn

added a link pointing to Preparatory school

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lucky Baldwin may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[File:Lillian_Ashley_Turnbull_thought_she_was_Lucky_Baldwin's_wife.jpg|thumb|125px|right|Lillian
• State of California|year=1878|publisher=A. L. Bancroft & Company|location=San Francisco}}</ref>) on the northeast corner of Powell and Market St. He also narrowly escaped death in a San Francisco

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:08, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Failure to follow accessibility guidelines. Thank you. Bgwhite (talk) 06:03, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi GeorgeLouis. User:Bgwhite is correct here. We do have rules, and you're free to ignore them if you can establish a consensus that doing so improves the encyclopedia. In the absence of that consensus, the kinds of changes you're making are going to be reverted, and eventually they're going to be seen as disruptive. If you think you've got a good case, take up at WP:MOS and get the rules changed. Otherwise, probably best to leave the TOC positioning alone. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 06:22, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ray L. Chesebro

added links pointing to Servicemen, Good Samaritan Hospital and Private practice

Edwin T. Baker

added links pointing to Blue books and Board of Equalization

List of Los Angeles municipal election returns

added links pointing to George Alexander and George Williams

Daniel Freeman (Los Angeles County)

added a link pointing to Manhattan Beach

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See Robert L. Burns

You are also once again putting material between the TOC and first header. Did you not see the editors telling you this is wrong at ANI? Also per MOS, images go first and TOC goes left, unless there is some good reason not to. Not [1] and [2] You don't have one a good reason. There are rules, even though you think there are none. You didn't listen to people at ANI. You don't acknowledge MOS. You didn't listen to people on your talk page. The only thing left is a block and nobody wants that. Your choice. Bgwhite (talk) 05:56, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I received this message and read it. Honestly, I have not placed anything between the TOC and the first header since you called this problem to my attention. Maybe you have run across some articles I did before you so kindly informed me of the guideline in question. On the other hand, I've noticed you have been changing some of my layouts without a full explanation as to why you did it, or maybe an erroneous one, such as claiming that I violated some kind of TOC "rule." Usually when I make a layout I try to avoid large chunks of white space and also I like to have the photos face inward, in keeping with what (to my mind) is basic layout that I learned several decades ago when I did them for a living. In any new articles I do I will be sure to abide by the TOC guidelines that you pointed out to me, since I do not care to engage in any kind of back-and-forthing: I would rather just write and post.

Also I want to point out that the reason WP:TOC exists is so that writers and editors continue to have the freedom to try new things in the hopes that others will adopt them, all to the benefit of Wikipedia. Yours, GeorgeLouis (talk) 21:06, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"I have not placed anything between the TOC and the first header since you called this problem to my attention." See July 24, July 23, July 21, July 13 and June 28. Now stop lying.

We have already talked about image and TOC placement above and at ANI. Per WP:LEAD, " Avoid floating the table of contents if possible, as it breaks the standard look of pages. " WP:LEAD is MOS. We follow MOS, but there are "occasional exceptions". Your "blank space" edits were even reverted by others. There is no try new things in MOS. There is no do what we feel like in MOS. We also do not remove Infoboxes. There is no rule that there should no be there except for classical music, musicians and composers. Now stop making up excuses or pointing to essays. Stop your saying you will follow MOS, but actually don't. Bgwhite (talk) 23:51, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I read the above and am simply appalled. I have no intention of getting into a debate when all I want to do is have a little enjoyment in life. This kind of stuff really takes the fun out of editing Wikipedia, which is one reason I haven't done it in a few days. I will check out the diffs that the esteemed editor cited above and try to see what he or she is getting at. (By the way, it would be really nice if somebody were to say, "GeorgeLouis, you have certainly added some interesting articles and done some really fine editing over the past several years. Gee, we are lucky to have a guy like you here!") Well, I can dream, can't I? Yours, GeorgeLouis (talk) 17:03, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

From #Table of Contents, "They seem to be all on Los Angeles politicians. I've enjoyed reading them. They are all very interesting."

You just reverted edits that four people agree upon. You reverted to once again put the TOC in wrong spot. I'm done. I'm requesting a block as you are just edit warring. Bgwhite (talk) 20:16, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Map of Hancock Park, Los Angeles, California.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:49, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bundy standoff may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:59, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Scottish Gaelic may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:15, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tread-Lightly-Sign-Frazier-Park-CA-October-2008.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:15, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:High-income cities or communities in Los Angeles County has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. John from Idegon (talk) 04:50, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

the first reference for the entry "Sandra Scofield" is a link to an advertisement for Sakura Internet. it should probably be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rapprochement (talk • contribs) 03:11, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited One Young World, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Environment and Plenary. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arisbe (daughter of Merops), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:28, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sorgavasal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musical score. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't saw it, but you did a redirect of this article almost 2 years ago without letting me know the reason behind it. Like, maybe its not my business to ask you for notifications (not that it is covered in any of our guidelines) but it would be nice for the future to inform users like me about an upcoming redirect. Because now I am confused since the place is as important as its founder Khaled Kasab Mahameed. Shouldn't they both exist? Also, from what I remembered it was not even on AfD. Thanks.--Mishae (talk) 02:55, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember any of this. Sorry. GeorgeLouis (talk) 22:59, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, George! At Peridon's suggestion I had a look at the draft in your sandbox. I should note that I am not any kind of authority, not even an admin. I have absolutely no right to pass judgment on your article. I am just someone that Peridon trusts to give advice about people's proposed-but-controversial articles.

There are two issues that always need to be considered: whether the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article (i.e., is it notable?), and the condition of the article itself. About the article itself: it is well written, but I strongly advise getting rid of the "products" list. That's an absolute magnet for somebody to tag the whole article as spam. Also, I notice that you left out any negative information, such as the report (reference 7) that many of the sprays are nothing but high-priced water, and the information (reference 1) that such sprays do not actually moisturize. I should warn you that if you don't add this balancing/NPOV material to the article, I will, when it goes live.

About the subject: I would say it's borderline. You have done a good job of finding and citing sources; in a brief search myself I couldn't find any to add. But the sources themselves are not the strongest - except for O they are minor fashion magazines and blogs - and for that reason I'm not sure the article would survive an AfD discussion. (BTW the "Dana Burke biography" link is not to a Dana Burke biography.) In particular you might consider whether the comments of a flight attendant, cited at a non-notable blog, actually add to or rather detract from the strength of the article. However, the article is strong enough that IMO it shouldn't qualify for SPEEDY or PROD. As for my own opinion about Facial water as a Wikipedia article: it certainly is a thing that exists and is talked about, and I think it might well qualify for an article here.

Bottom line, I will suggest to Peridon that he remove the block on the article and let you launch it and see what happens. If it gets deleted a third time - well, at that point it might be time to give up on this subject. --MelanieN (talk) 17:47, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I notice that you are a paid editor with regard to this article; thank you for disclosing. You might want to consult with your client about my comments above. They need to realize that once the article is in mainspace, you will not be able to control the content of the article. --MelanieN (talk) 18:23, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Melanie. @GeorgeLouis - over to you. Do you want to risk it now or take some more time to make adjustments based on Melanie's comments? I won't unprotect the title until I hear from you as to your plans. BTW including longish indented quotes always rings a warning bell, especially when they are all pro-subject. They are like the 'housewives' on washing powder ads, or the 'reviews' of books and records on Amazon. On Facebook, fine. Best avoided here. Peridon (talk) 19:21, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I want to submit the newly fashioned article into Facial water. I've taken care of the warnings that the above editors gave me. If you would simply fix the Facial water page so that I can paste my offering into it, I would greatly appreciate your action. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 23:35, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to suggest moving it, but you've got all sorts of other stuff in the history. Moving clears the history of the sandbox ready for the next thing. Too late now... If you want the sandbox cleared after this, tag it db-U1. OK, the title's unprotected. Up to you now... Peridon (talk) 00:59, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article looks better. Publishing the article once it no longer meets criteria for a WP:SPEEDY is WP:BOLD, fine, as long as you don't break something in the process. EBY (talk) 23:03, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wait you cannot just copy a draft to the main space! You have to move it. The history needs to be there in the new article under copyright laws so as to give credit. You should have moved the page to the new title. You'll have to fix this now. King Of The Wise (talk) 01:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think you could have done it since you know what the rules are and I didn't. That would have been the collegial thing to do. GeorgeLouis (talk) 12:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Er.. maybe you did not notice, but I did do it. I got your copy paste page deleted and then accepted the draft, moved it and did all the complementary cleaning up processes that have to be done then. I was merely trying to press upon you that that was not the right thing to do. I did fix it myself then. But anyways, thanks for your copy edit on that page. Theat made it easier for me to accept it. King Of The Wise (talk) 22:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Merçi. I was confused by "You'll have to fix this now." I guess you did all that work afterward. Thank you again. We are all working for the same goal. GeorgeLouis (talk) 22:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Lindsay Shearer-Nelko, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. King Of The Wise (talk) 00:40, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contribs to WIkipedia! Bananasoldier (talk) 06:37, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yum! (Munch, munch.) To what do I owe this welcome hunk of luscious scrumptiousness? GeorgeLouis (talk) 06:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GeorgeLouis, I received the notices on my talk page and saw the post to the Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents talk page with regards to copyright violations with fire department pages that I have edited or contributed to. I simply did not understand the basics of copyright or original research in regards Wikipedia when I made these edits or contributions. I thought that I could post copyrighted information as long as it was cited. I now understand what I have done and the magnitude/severity of my edits/contributions and can assure you that it will not happen again. Thank you--FDNY18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stan Lathan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WGBH (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stephen Gold, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hacker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please see WP:THREAD, second box. Per that page, the indent level is for indicating which comment you're replying to, not for ease of reading. It can't serve both purposes. Your last edit, at Wikipedia:Help_desk#Editorial_policy, makes it appear as if Robert McClenon is replying to my comment, but he is not. I used to insert blank lines between speakers for readability, but I was recently told not to do that because of accessibility issues. I'll go ahead and revert your edit per WP:BRD, feel free to start a talk page discussion to explain why we should deviate from the guideline on this. Thanks. ―Mandruss ☎ 09:03, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That's quite a change from when I started editing some eight years ago. I'll take note of that now. GeorgeLouis (talk) 09:12, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mr. Louis: thanks for your support on my not being deleted. I hope I got you on the right page. Thanks. philipofBVMPhilipofBVM 22:39, 14 January 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by PhilipofBVM (talk • contribs)

Mr. George Louis, can you help me again, please? If not mistaken, you helped me at least once in a difficult post I wanted to make, and you did such, and then put the footnote refenence in for me. Thanks again. Can you help me locate that post again, as I can't seem to locate it??? Thanks. philipofBVMPhilipofBVM (talk) 02:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC) PhilipofBVM (talk) 02:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a contribution that YOU made, you can find a list by clicking on "Contributions" at the top of your own User Page. Otherwise, I do not know what you are referring to. GeorgeLouis (talk) 07:05, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Dreadstar ☥ 04:13, 3 February 2015 (UTC)Template:Z33[reply]

I just wanted to let you know that I reverted your edit to the Gamergate controversy article. My reasoning and a talk page discussion can be found here; you're welcome to participate (of course), and I'm willing to self-revert for a reasoned argument. Thanks! AtomsOrSystems (talk) 20:38, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for editing the article I wrote on Silent Spring Institute. You obviously spent a considerable amount of time, not only addressing the concerns of the first editor but adding content I had decided not to include. (And YOU'RE a "deletionist"?) I will add a few photographs and a few more titles to the list of Suggested Readings. I do think Wikipedia users should know about Silent Spring Institute, and I am grateful for your help. 65.96.211.80 (talk) 17:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anybody can edit, so you can delete what you want to, as long as you have a good reason to do so. Just put the reason in the Edit Summary. GeorgeLouis (talk) 20:59, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Straits Settlements may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[List of English-speaking places occupied by Axis powers in World War II

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Im Helen Guerra Walsh, im a Costarican evangelical women pastor, thanks for he welcome, God Bless you!--Pastora Helen Guerra (talk) 04:19, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ELreydeEspana. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:18, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Andy, but nothing is lost by my being polite to this editor, no matter who she is. GeorgeLouis (talk) 22:35, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Garrigues (law firm) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:57, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi George, I noticed you merged San Diego and California. I do a lot of edits to city and town articles, and it makes me nuts when editors separate the city and state. I'd be happy to do away with all links to familiar geographic places, and I think there's something in the linking MOS which encourages this. And for the users of Wikipedia, clicking on "San Diego" will get you to a "California" link anyway. Just wanted to thank you for that edit. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 05:04, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I often unlink to the big cities. GeorgeLouis (talk) 06:53, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reference. I intend to go very slowly, and give her the credit for all of the performances I have seen. Thanks again.Lbhiggin (talk) 06:49, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of newspaper columnists, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page is colossal. You know you could shrink it whenever you want, right? Do you not put the discussions from 2012, 2013, or 2014 into the archive (as you said you'd like to do)? HanSangYoon (talk) 15:53, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Can you do it for me? GeorgeLouis (talk) 17:41, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As a help, sure. HanSangYoon (talk) 19:43, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Or you could let a bot archive it for you. Try adding the following text to the top of this page:

{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{atnhead}}
|maxarchivesize = 60K
|counter = 1
|minthreadsleft = 10
|algo = old(7d)
|archive = User talk:GeorgeLouis/Archive %(counter)d
}}

That should cover you. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:25, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did it, but I don't see any difference. GeorgeLouis (talk) 21:49, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Just so you know, it sometimes takes a while for MiszaBot to kick in. It may even take a week or more. But eventually it will archive your Talk page for you, for free!  :) --IJBall (talk) 22:42, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Then will I be presented with a pristine page for new comments? GeorgeLouis (talk) 22:46, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It will still leave the most recent posts on your Talk page – as currently set, it looks like it will only keep Talk page topics that were started within the last 7 days "old(7d)", so you may want to set that back further to "old(30d)" to keep a month's worth of posts, or say "old(90d)" or "old(365d)" for 3 month's or one year's worth of posts, respectively. Topics that are older than this cutoff will be moved to an "Talk archive" page. If you want an example of what this will look like, take a look at Talk:List of metro systems. Hope this helps! --IJBall (talk) 22:58, February 24, 2015

I set it at 365d. Thanks. GeorgeLouis (talk) 23:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GeorgeLouis! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 01:09, Thursday, February 26, 2015 (UTC)

ColonialGrid decided to report me here about defending the Busan Metro Line 1's template route map (check the history)...might wanna check. I am beyond ridiculed. (Also, check ColonialGrid's and SarekOfVulcan's talk page) HanSangYoon (talk) 07:20, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I put that on the 24th-which the article was recreated since, that is why. Wgolf (talk) 20:48, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted and then recreated? Was it improved? GeorgeLouis (talk) 20:57, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No idea-I put up a speedy and it was deleted and now it has been recreated. Wgolf (talk) 21:03, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I will leave the fallout to you. GeorgeLouis (talk) 21:06, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the cookies! IndiePhunq (talk) 21:15, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your gracious note.

It took me an hour to find the sources in storage, and then I had to type the entire post over when my browser crashed 9/10ths of the way through. But I have answered you on the article talk page why the Lewis speculation (at least the "quercus" part is known to be false. His intuition that there was a non PIE root *kar "hard" seems to be correct, if we accept the various words for stone I have attested. See the talk page and respond there, since this should be preserved for future reference on the article.

Kindly, μηδείς (talk) 02:12, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 7dayshop.com, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dispatch and Fulfillment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please provide me some feedback/assistance on what is wrong with the references provided for Salvatore Giacona ? I would very much appreciate it. Thanks. . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rawheaven (talk • contribs) 17:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The problem with that article is not with the references but with the fact that the person is not WP:Notable. If you want to prove the Notability of that person, then you should make your comments at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Salvatore_Giacona. GeorgeLouis (talk) 17:20, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) What he means is that the references are not the reliable, independent sources needed to pass GNG and save the article. There may be sources that exist to do so, but they are not in the article at present. See also WP:RELIABLESOURCE. pbp 20:21, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. pbp 22:11, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello George,thanks for your edit I thought it wold have been better like that but now I think that the List would look better if divided into pages like the Sibley-Monroe checklist 1 if you can try to divide it like that thank you but for now I will restore it as it was before

Regards Owlsofeurope Owlsofeurope (talk) 08:23, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My name is Eve Sullivan, and I am the editor of Artlink Magazine (user name on Wikipedia registered as Artlink editor]. My email is eve.sullivan@artlink.com.au I am new to Wikpedia, and BeenAroundAWhile noted dispute re: entry on Artlink Magazine. The entry that has not been changed for about a decade is long-winded, irrelevant and out of date. As the new editor, I want to get rid of the guff and just do the more neutral, minimal and straightforward information like entry on Frieze Magazine is a good model. I would also like to insert a box with categories like Frieze (if I can work out how to do this, with // to denote new line here).: Categories: art magazine // Frequency: quarterly magazine // Founder: Stephanie Britton AM // First issue: 1981 // Country: Australia // Based in: Adelaide // Language: English // Website: www.artlink.com.au // ISSN: 0727-1239 [Link to world catalogue?] Please see PROPOSED MAIN TEXT EDITS BELOW, and give approval to enter these along with the row box details to go under a more recent example of the magazine cover that I would like to supply. I would be happy to male these changes to make it less trouble for others. Hope that is all OK:

Artlink Magazine

Artlink is a quarterly themed magazine covering contemporary art and ideas from Australia and the Asia-Pacific.

Published by Artlink Australia, based in Adelaide, Artlink receives support from the Australia Council for the Arts and the South Australian Department for the Arts and other state funding bodies.

History [sub-title here, same as existing edit]

Artlink was established in 1981 as a bi-monthly magazine with the aim of providing a national profile for South Australian art and linking contemporary art organizations in Adelaide. Artlink has evolved since those early days to position Australian art within a national and international context through its themed editions.

Since 1990, Artlink has published regular editions of Artlink Indigenous, commissioned by Australian Indigenous and Torres Strait Islander writers, curators and artists.

In 2014, Stephanie Britton retired from the position of Executive Editor after publishing 145 issues in 33 years. Eve Sullivan was appointed Executive Editor in July 2014.

Distribution[sub-title here, same as existing edit] Artlink is distributed by Gordon & Gotch to newsagents in Australia and New Zealand, and by Artlink Australia to independent bookshops, galleries and museums.

External links[ sub-title here, no change edit required] • Artlink's official website Artlink editor (talk) 09:31, 22 March 2015 (UTC) Artlink editor (talk) 11:20, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain this [3] addition you made on my talk page. In the first place, you didn't revert my edit -- or anybody's edit -- on the Phyllis Schlafly article. Second, my revert was appropriate -- as far as I can tell Schlafly is still alive. I had just reverted another later edit by the user and issued a vandalism warning and saw the earlier Schlafly vandalism so I reverted that. Third, there is almost a week delay between my edit and your notice. What is going on? I don't see how this could have been some inadvertent typo. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 12:38, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, I cannot explain what happened there, and I apologize that I seem to have goofed up. I think I was staying up too late and attempting to edit too fast. Sincerely, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 19:27, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your reverts at Venus. We had an edit conflict (working on the page simultaneously) and I think I accidentally undid your revert. Isambard Kingdom (talk) 02:35, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have added more citations for Alexis Marcou. Let me know if you need me to add more. Thanks! --Mike1582 (talk) 05:10, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome! Actually, I'm an old Wikipedian who hasn't edited or admined in nearly a decade and may or may not stick around again, so what with policy changes and a fuzzy memory you're probably going to see me acting like a bizarre mixture of a new Wikipeidan and an old hand. Sudo edit this page (talk) 06:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you as old as me? I am 83. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 16:34, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stick around a while, I found your comments in the Teahouse and related talk pages refreshing. re; those dastardly Dallas City Council elections....

  Bfpage |leave a message  11:38, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please give me some time to find the material you need in order for this article to be complete. I know that the artist Alexis Marcou has done many exhibitions and included in books and journals. Also he was awarded more than once his field and his work has appeared on Tv. The problem is that it is hard to find these sourses as he is a low profile as a personality. I am sure if you give me some time to gather all this material which exists the article will meet the criteria that you mentioned . Please don't delete an article so quick. It needs some time to evolve and improve. --Mike1582 (talk) 14:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mike, you have to make the same comment at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Alexis_Marcou. I have nothing to do with whether this article gets deleted or not. I am not an WP:Administrator. The best thing is for you to move into your Sandbox and work on it there. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 03:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Lakun.patra. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Shivam protein products, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Lakun.patra (talk) 05:28, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BeenAroundAWhile. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Flat Out let's discuss it 04:56, 27 March 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

"Reinstating a more balanced lede for this article. Watch WP:3RR" - excuse me? I hadn't edited this article in over a month before reverting the non-neutral contribution of an obvious sock. Who are you? –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:54, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just warning against an WP:Edit war. Don't want to see any editor get sucked into one. Didn't mean you in particular. Sorry that I was not clear. I know that WP:Edit summaries are not supposed to be used that way. I slipped up. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 06:00, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the page history you will notice that Roscelese and I were restoring the well-cited consensus version, and you were restoring a non-neutral new version added by an obvious sockpuppet. You might want to self-revert until discussion determines a new version. Binksternet (talk) 06:05, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't know about him or her being a sock puppet, Binkster, my friend, because I try to WP:Assume good faith. I happen to agree with the version of the lede that I restored. It seemed to me to be much more neutral than the other one. We all have our opinions, and that is mine. Anybody is free to delete the version again and go to the talk page. But of course you know all that because you, too, as a seasoned Wikipedian, have BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 06:14, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Original Barnstar

Thanks very much from editor of Artlink trying to change my site. Yours is the voice of reason. Still struggling with how-to-do this thing, and get around this idea of verifiability, but have just changed my name to Artsandculture, and will insert a revised draft in my sandbox. Thank you and would appreciate your continued advice and assistance with this. Artsandculture (talk) 04:23, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You chaned the content while I was actively updating that page and referencing the local government website (http://germantown.oh.us/). I'm saving repeated (because of timeouts) as I make edits right now and don't have everything added in and finished. You were looking while I was mid-edit and hadn't added references yet. User:Flerchjj — Preceding undated comment added 04:01, 29 March 2015 (UTC) I'm done for the time being and it should look better now. Data should be updated with references in place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flerchjj (talk • contribs) 04:27, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just use a template like this one { { In use } }. See more at Template:In_use.BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 04:51, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Sorry that I made them too fast. It just seems like some stuff was made up or was inferred even though sourcing did exist. I was just removing stuff that looked fishy because they weren't generally things that the average citizen would know. For example, most people don't know that Chinatown existed in Pittsburgh, Baltimore or St. Louis, which was why I removed them. --Patebrims (talk) 05:03, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Though I'm not particularly new here, I do appreciate the sentiment. Thanks! :) Trivialist (talk) 17:42, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

This article is coming along well, but I think it quotes too heavily from news sources. Wikipedia is not a newspaper, so keep that in mind as you work on the article. Try taking some of the quotes and rephrasing them in your own words. Thanks,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Convoy of Hope and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

wia (talk) 15:12, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Teahouse, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! wia (talk) 15:12, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops; you've been on Wikipedia longer than I have, so obviously the Teahouse invitation might come across as insulting. No offence intended, my friend! wia (talk) 15:15, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I hang out in the Teahouse and give lots of free advice, though I am not listed as one of the regulars. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 17:59, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	Teahouse Barnstar
	For asking, and even more so, for answering well. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:51, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I closed the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragon Ball Online Global (2nd nomination) because the first nomination is still open. The author removed the first AfD tag from the article. The deletion discussion continues at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragon Ball Online Global. • Gene93k (talk) 23:02, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Americans for Prosperity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim Phillips (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My apologize for not replying sooner. Anyways, where exactly did I insult the user here? AcidSnow (talk) 01:28, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking. My feeling when I wrote the comment was something like: When you preface a remark with "Sigh," well, that is insulting, as if to say, "You, sir, are a ninny, and I am fed up with catering to your imbecility." I would hope you not "Sigh" through your keyboard anymore. Were one to sigh with exasperation in my direction, I would be mightily offended. This is what I was feeling and, come to think of it, still feel. But the conversation has tapered off, and that is a Good Thing. Sincerely, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 03:55, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your input. I replyed on the noticeboard or do you want to continue it here? AcidSnow (talk) 04:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to continue anything. Thanks for responding. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 04:08, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, best regards. AcidSnow (talk) 04:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to know the {{Uw-COI}} template exists to efficiently warn potential COI editors and makes possible future enforcement actions. Rather than just tagging the article, as here. Cheers, Brianhe (talk) 03:59, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That tag does not provide for any details. Also, what "enforcement actions" and how? Thanks for commenting and responding. I am finding a lot of undeclared paid editing recently. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 05:11, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thank you for feedback on the article. I created it, and also the one about the company's CEO James N. Grace.

I believe IMT is notable because it is the first aggregator of travel insurance to also offer reviews of policies and companies.

Which language would you like me to change so that it reads less like an advertisement?

Regarding the CEO, James N. Grace, I created a separate page for him because an editor a few years ago said information about a company's CEO did not belong on a company page. I'm very happy to delete the James N. Grace page and add a sentence or two about him to the IMT page.

Thank you for your time and help.

User: Djhuff — Preceding undated comment added 20:34, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And thank YOU for writing. Suggested changes should go on the Talk pages of the articles. Yours, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 21:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hey hi..can i know how to insert images in to the articles ..?? i have seen insert image option , but when i am pastig teh link i was not able to see the image swaroop 04:48, 28 April 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sakthi swaroop (talk • contribs)

I am sorry, but the way to upload images is so complicated that I cannot explain it simply here. Your friend, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 00:35, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fletchers Solicitors, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Network, NHS and ITV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Wikipedia:CYCLE must to be a consensus. Also, new map break the three rules of Wikipedia. Your action is unacceptable. Next your revert be considered vandalism. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 01:33, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]