Battle of Malvern Hill has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 13, 2015 Good article nominee Listed

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: North America / United States / American Civil War GA‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles GA This article has been rated as GA-class on the project's quality scale. Associated task forces: /  North American military history task force United States military history task force American Civil War task force Virginia GA‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles GA This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:Maintained

I have removed the claim about Private Edwin Jennison being the youngest casualty of the war. My references do not mention him and the link provided to PS 110 does not claim he was the youngest. This link -- http://sciway3.net/proctor/marion/military/wbts/edwin.html -- claims that his name was actually Jemison and that he was 17. We can put something back in if we get some better references because the photo of this soldier is quite famous. Hal Jespersen (talk) 15:08, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This link comes up as not found, although it goes to the right site:

Glendale and Malvern Hill battlefields at the Civil War Preservation Trust

The error says that the page is currently not available. I'm not sure if they moved it permanently or temporarily. Bill the Cat 7 (talk) 21:07, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Hal Jespersen (talk) 13:50, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am certainly no expert on this battle and Lee's tactics were certainly questionable. However, the battle would seem to have accomplished something since, "Despite his victory, Maj. Gen. George B. McClellan withdrew . . ."

I might not have ventured a comment, but there is also a clear misuse of the word "untenable" in the AFTERMATH section, drawing into question the professionalism of the article.

I think this needs rewritten in a form that useless less words of opinion. I found the same problem in the article that sent me here, on General Lewis Armistead, where this battle, w/o citation or evidence, is referred to as "senseless," surely a word of opinion.

129.62.200.171 (talk) 21:01, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]