Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
SilkTork (talk | contribs)
recruitment centre no longer active
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
|}<br>
|}<br>
{{Wikipedia:Good article nominations/backlog|backlog=yes}}
{{Wikipedia:Good article nominations/backlog|backlog=yes}}
<center>{{notice|<center>'''ATTENTION NEW REVIEWERS: PLEASE READ THE [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions|INSTRUCTIONS PAGE]] BEFORE REVIEWING ARTICLES.</center>}}</center>
[[Image:GA candidate.svg|left|64px]] <center>'''Good articles''' are articles that have been evaluated by an uninvolved editor against a minimum standard of quality. This standard is less than [[WP:Featured articles|featured articles]]. Here, potential Good articles are nominated for review against the [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|Good article criteria]].
[[Image:GA candidate.svg|left|64px]] <center>'''Good articles''' are articles that have been evaluated by an uninvolved editor against a minimum standard of quality. This standard is less than [[WP:Featured articles|featured articles]]. Here, potential Good articles are nominated for review against the [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|Good article criteria]].



Revision as of 00:42, 9 June 2014

MainCriteriaInstructionsNominationsBacklog drivesMentorshipReview circlesDiscussionReassessmentReport


This page has a backlog that requires the attention of willing reviewers. You can help!
The oldest unreviewed good article nominations are:

Paul George (talk | history | start review) • Frank Butler (American football) (talk | history | start review) • Jug Bennett (talk | history | start review) • Hal Hinte (talk | history | start review) • Wuert Engelmann (talk | history | start review)

The highest priority unreviewed good article nominations are:

Paul GeorgeFrank Butler (American football)Aérospatiale SA 330 PumaArrangement of linesLine of Duty series 3

Good articles are articles that have been evaluated by an uninvolved editor against a minimum standard of quality. This standard is less than featured articles. Here, potential Good articles are nominated for review against the Good article criteria.

Any uninvolved and registered user may review an article nominated at this page against the criteria. It can take several weeks for an article to get reviewed, so please be patient. Nominators should respond positively to constructive criticism and work with the reviewer to improve the article (if there are any issues) to Good article status. If the article is promoted, a small plus sign inside a circle (This symbol designates good articles on Wikipedia.) will appear on the top right corner of the article's page indicating that the article has been deemed Good by the reviewer. Instructions on the reviewing and nominating process can be found by clicking the "Instruction" tab above.

If you want to nominate an article for delisting from Good article status, please go here to nominate it.

There are currently 604 nominations listed and 510 waiting to be reviewed.


List of good articles nominations, arranged by topic

Leave a Reply