Past Discussions

Kinda doubting about it. There might be some who says, but it will need reliable sources, and section may need to be re-written. OccultZone (talk) 22:34, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the section definitely needs some reliable sources. But reliable sources that support Brazil as a potential superpower are thin on the ground. I haven't been able to find any. Brazil is in a very different category than true potential superpowers like China, India and even the European Union. There are lots of academic sources supporting those. Antiochus the Great (talk) 10:43, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So, re-writing would be best option. OccultZone (talk) 08:17, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i made this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Power_(international_relations)&diff=593786673&oldid=593409607 I deleted those two references because the first one is about Italy's role in the Mediterranean while the second one is a link is to the main page of Carabinieri. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minorpain (talk • contribs) 21:36, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you for informing me. Next time please leave an edit summary when you edit an article, it will help others to understand you edits. Thanks again. Antiochus the Great (talk) 22:20, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just warned yesterday the Presidency of the Republic of Italy. Next times they'll follow and act at every level and in every way on Italy related articles by special services.They are ineterested in it.In Wikipedia english too many people "played" with "Italy" article with main italian Symbols.I trust in a your good and constructive action.If Japan or Germany or France or UK are Great Powers it's rewally strange that Italy can't be so.It'sd be really original not only in Wikipedia.151.40.94.28 (talk) 09:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]