Hello! This article may not have the correct title, I would have thought it should be HMS Stork (disambiguation) the same as HMS Beagle (disambiguation). Danrok (talk) 16:22, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Beagle (disambiguation) - and a very few others like HMS Victory (disambiguation) - are exceptions because of the high notability of one of the set. Those pages, and HMS Stork and scores of similar pages, are not in fact disambiguation pages but set index articles. Take a look at Category:Set indices on ships.
Stanning 16:42, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Saw your comment on the talk page for this entry, and totally agree this is lamentable at present. Your suggestion to make the updates automatic looks like the way to go, and I'll give it a try, starting with the entries that I can spot are out of date. But I'm still a newbie, so do take a look to make sure I'm not making things worse!Hyegyong (talk) 18:47, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help! Stanning (talk) 21:42, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stephen Evans (NATO).jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Blurred Lines 22:40, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]