Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
rewording?
 
Ed g2s (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
{| class="messagebox standard-talk"
{| class="messagebox standard-talk"
|-
|-
| [[Image:Symbol unsupport vote.png|none|50px| ]]
| [[Image:Symbol unsupport vote.svg|none|50px| ]]
| '''{{PAGENAME}}''' is a former '''''[[Wikipedia:Good articles|good article]]''''' candidate. There are suggestions below for which areas need improvement to satisfy the [[Wikipedia:What is a good article|good article criteria]]. Once the objections are addressed, the article can be [[Wikipedia:Good articles/Nominations|renominated]] as a good article. If you disagree with the objections, you can seek a [[Wikipedia:Good articles/Disputes|review]].
| '''{{PAGENAME}}''' is a former '''''[[Wikipedia:Good articles|good article]]''''' candidate. There are suggestions below for which areas need improvement to satisfy the [[Wikipedia:What is a good article|good article criteria]]. Once the objections are addressed, the article can be [[Wikipedia:Good articles/Nominations|renominated]] as a good article. If you disagree with the objections, you can seek a [[Wikipedia:Good articles/Disputes|review]].
|}
|}

Revision as of 13:58, 30 May 2006

As part of a group of related potential changes, I have suggested rewording this to:

FailedGA is a former good article candidate. There are suggestions below for which areas need improvement to satisfy the good article criteria. Once the objections are addressed, the article can be renominated as a good article. If you disagree with the objections, you can seek a review.

Please see Wikipedia talk:Good articles for more details. TheGrappler 03:26, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply