Welcome!

Hello, Nick.mon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Vasco Errani, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —Tom Morris (talk) 12:52, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Vasco Errani has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:52, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to Angelino Alfano was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SuperMarioMan 18:35, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Nick.mon/President of Emilia-Romagna has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/President of Emilia-Romagna, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 16:36, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/President of Emilia-Romagna.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! sonia (talk) 10:15, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nick.mon, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you'd like to drop by the Teahouse and discuss the article, the experienced hosts at the Teahouse would be glad to see if they can offer improvement suggestions... and that may lead to the article becoming accepted. Please join us! sonia (talk) 10:15, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Ignazio La Russa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Alliance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Lega Nord shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --RJFF (talk) 20:56, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at The People of Freedom shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --RJFF (talk) 13:03, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Benevolent dictatorship. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Saddhiyama (talk) 18:24, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Five Star Movement, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mushroom (Talk) 20:22, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! Wikipedia is the best place to share your knowledge and to learn from others' knowledge too.

Salma Vian (talk) 11:27, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Emilia-Romagna regional election, 2010 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Regional Council

Vasco Errani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Emilia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:49, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 Northern Italy earthquakes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mirabello (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You've been editing the list a lot recently. I'm not quite sure what you're trying to achieve with it, and I'm not convinced that you're improving it. Whatever complaint you had about the list's formatting before you started editing it (which was my design), could you let me know, so that I can see if there's a way to fix it without endless editing? LookLook36 (talk) 12:12, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Silvio Berlusconi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Lega Nord shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --RJFF (talk) 12:41, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to List of Secretaries of the Democratic Party, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 21:11, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Lega Nord shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --RJFF (talk) 13:34, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 21:46, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nick.mon,

I would like to invite you to discuss your conflict with User:Checco over whether to include the totalized number of seats in the regional councils to the infoboxes of Italian parties or not, in order to end your edit war with Checco.

Kind regards, --RJFF (talk) 00:56, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello guys and thanks to RJFF for bringing this issue here. I'm not an edit-warrior and I always give explanation for my edits in edit summeries, while I have to notice that Nick.mon never does that, and that's definitely not helpful. Though I'm very happy to give explanation for my edits on "regional council seats". I have many arguments for not including them in the infoboxes of Italian parties. Let me just present the strongest ones.

First of all, I do think that including those data is deceptive as it doesn't represent fairly the real strenght of Italian parties in regional assemblies as the apportionment of seats tends to vary a lot (just an example, Lombardy has a population of 10.0 million and 80 seats in the assembly, while Sardinia 1.7m and 70 seats, Molise 0.3m and 30 seats, etc.). Secondly, it is very hard to figure out how many seats each party controls: not all the regional websites are properly updated, regional councillors often form joint groups (and it's difficult to figure out individual affiliations), and they often switch groups and parties. Moreover, the Italian party system is very fragmented and at the regional level there are many regional parties, which sometimes include members of national parties. At the end of the day, there is no authority or website who constantly tracks what regional councillors are doing, and thus the data that Nick.mon has frequently inserted in the infoboxes are nothing more than original research (maybe they're taken from it.Wiki, which can't be a source for an en.Wiki article and which is often out-of-date).

I'm sure thay Nick.mon will understand. I appreciate his/her good faith and his/her devoteness to the encyclopedia. I would like to suggest him/her anyway to always give explanation for his/her edits through edit summeries. That is extremely helpful. Of course, when one user keep disagreeing with another, there are always talk pages for a proper conversation. There are few users devoted to Italian politics in en.Wiki: we should learn to cooperate. --Checco (talk) 09:26, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nick.mon, please be invited to discuss your edits at Talk:Next Italian general election. --RJFF (talk) 15:15, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your recent edits to Lega Nord have been reverted as they could be seen to be defamatory or potentially libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 23:03, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maurizio Migliavacca, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arda (river) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Prime Ministers of Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vatican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:21, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Prime Ministers of Italy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mafioso and Piazza del Duomo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm RJFF. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Silvio Berlusconi, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 23:16, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Presidents of Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neapolitan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Antonio Ingroia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pool

Orange Movement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Orange

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:28, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am obliged to inform you. (Sorry I didn't use http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:ANI-notice but I couldn't figure out how it works. I'm not a tech person. :/) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4idaho (talk • contribs) 15:55, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please, you must correct the color of Monti's new party / coalition: the correct color is gray (or white), not blue.--151.67.122.213 (talk) 18:05, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And the colour of UDC is white: please correct (on Italian election page and party page).--151.67.122.213 (talk) 18:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Democratic Centre (Italy) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Orange

Italian general election, 2013 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Liberal

Monti's Agenda for Italy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Liberal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Italian general election, 2013 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --RJFF (talk) 15:02, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are doing it again. Please either explain your changes on the talk page or stop doing them. The consequences of edit warring have been explained to you before. Better avoid them. --RJFF (talk) 15:07, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Force (Italy), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages State and Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Historical Right (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Conservator

Project South (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Azure

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to explain why I reverted your edit at Roman Empire. A discussion on the talk page among multiple editors decided that the "vexilloid", being a modern fiction, was not as representative of the Roman state as a symbol chosen by the Roman state itself. Coinage was one of the primary media of Imperial public relations, to avoid the less neutral word "propaganda". A coin image thus functions something like a state seal. Didn't want the revert to seem arbitrary. Cynwolfe (talk) 15:06, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you. (User talk:Nick.mon) 10:51, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Italian general election, 2013 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --RJFF (talk) 17:56, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain you edits using the edit summary field below the editing box. This will make it understandable to other editors why you make a certain change. Otherwise you will appear to be very uncooperative. Other editors will think that you make some edits for no reason. --RJFF (talk) 18:00, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nick.mon, please start to use the edit summary field to explain your edits. Otherwise other users won't understand why you make a certain edit (like this one) and will revert it. --RJFF (talk) 21:11, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Historical Right, Nick.mon!

Wikipedia editor GeorgeLouis just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

You need citations in Historical Right. If you don't know how to do them, I will help you or do it for you.

To reply, leave a comment on GeorgeLouis's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mario Draghi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bank of Italy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nick.mon,

in case that you disagree with other users' edits, please use the talk page to discuss and to find consensus in order to avoid edit wars. Thank you. Kind regards. --RJFF (talk) 14:34, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Italian general election, 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Libertarian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Italian general election, 2013 and Template:Democratic Party (Italy)/meta/color shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --RJFF (talk) 15:30, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 17:35, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've reviewed the report filed against you at WP:ANEW. Your comment there appears to acknowledge that you're edit-warring and that you won't continue to do so. However, I need a more explicit promise from you that you will not edit-war on Italian general election, 2013 or any other page at Wikipedia. If you make that promise, I will not block you. However, even if you make that promise and you break it, you may be blocked without warning and even if your edits do not rise to a breach of WP:3RR. Please respond here before contributing elsewhere at Wikipedia.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:15, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]