→Nomination topics and subtopics: remve lists. GAN does not do lists (use WP:FL instead) |
Jezhotwells (talk | contribs) m →Nomination topics and subtopics: adding dance |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
*'''Social sciences and society: '''[[WP:GAN#Culture, sociology and psychology|Culture, sociology and psychology]]{{dot}}[[WP:GAN#Education|Education]]{{dot}}[[WP:GAN#Economics and business|Economics and business]]{{dot}}[[WP:GAN#Law|Law]]{{dot}}[[WP:GAN#Media and journalism|Media and journalism]]{{dot}}[[WP:GAN#Politics and government|Politics and government]] |
*'''Social sciences and society: '''[[WP:GAN#Culture, sociology and psychology|Culture, sociology and psychology]]{{dot}}[[WP:GAN#Education|Education]]{{dot}}[[WP:GAN#Economics and business|Economics and business]]{{dot}}[[WP:GAN#Law|Law]]{{dot}}[[WP:GAN#Media and journalism|Media and journalism]]{{dot}}[[WP:GAN#Politics and government|Politics and government]] |
||
*'''Sports and recreation:''' [[WP:GAN#Sports and recreation|Sports and recreation]] |
*'''Sports and recreation:''' [[WP:GAN#Sports and recreation|Sports and recreation]] |
||
*'''Theatre, film and drama:''' [[WP:GAN#Episodes|Episodes]]{{dot}}[[WP:GAN#Other theatre, film and drama articles|Theatre, film and drama]] (for other Theatre, film and drama articles) |
*'''Theatre, film, dance and drama:''' [[WP:GAN#Episodes|Episodes]]{{dot}}[[WP:GAN#Other theatre, film and drama articles|Theatre, film and drama]] (for other Theatre, film, dance and drama articles) |
||
*'''Video games:''' [[WP:GAN#Video games|Video games]] |
*'''Video games:''' [[WP:GAN#Video games|Video games]] |
||
*'''[[WP:GAN#Miscellaneous|Miscellaneous]]''' |
*'''[[WP:GAN#Miscellaneous|Miscellaneous]]''' |
Revision as of 22:59, 4 August 2012
Good article nominationsWikipedia:Good articles is a list of articles that meet a core set of editorial standards but are not featured article quality. The Good article nominations page provides a list of articles which have been nominated for Good article status, as well as instructions for nominators and reviewers. Articles can be nominated by anyone, and reviewed by any registered user who has not contributed significantly to the article. There are currently 617 nominations listed and 498 waiting to be reviewed. |
How to nominate an articleIf you believe an article meets the Good article criteria, you may nominate it in the following way (please read the guide for nominating good articles for further advice):
If you've completed these two steps successfully, a bot will post your nomination on this page within 20 minutes. It may take several weeks for your nomination to be reviewed, as there are usually many open nominations. Do not start the review page yourself as this may lead other reviewers to believe that your nomination is already under review. If you are a registered user, you are encouraged to help by reviewing other articles. To leave a note related to the review, edit the To withdraw a nomination before the review has begun, remove the {{GA nominee}} from the article talk page. If you wish to withdraw a nomination after the review has begun, then the nomination must be closed using the fail process to record the outcome of the review. |
Nomination topics and subtopics
|
How to review an articleWhen choosing an article to review, keep in mind:
Review carefully—see Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles for more advice or you can ask questions at the Good article help desk. |
PassIf you feel the article meets the Good article criteria:
|
FailIf you feel the article does not meet the Good article criteria:
|
On holdYou may put an article "On Hold" for a period of time, generally one week:
|
Second opinionIf you are unsure whether an article meets the Good article criteria, you may ask another reviewer or subject expert for a second opinion:
|
|