Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin
Browse history interactively
Next edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Lord Roem (talk | contribs)
Autopatrolled, Administrators
10,801 edits
start
 
Create
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>{{Signpost draft}}{{Wikipedia:Signpost/Template:Signpost-header|||}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{Signpost draft}}{{Wikipedia:Signpost/Template:Signpost-header|||}}</noinclude>


{{Wikipedia:Signpost/Template:Signpost-article-start|{{{1|(Your article's descriptive subtitle here)}}}|By [[User:Lord Roem|Lord Roem]]| 28 May 2012}}
{{Wikipedia:Signpost/Template:Signpost-article-start|{{{1|No open arbitration cases}}}|By [[User:M.O.X|M.O.X]]| 28 May 2012}}


The Arbitration Committee has neither closed nor opened any cases for two weeks.
Text text text text text.


===Subheading ===
===Pending cases===
====[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case|Fæ request for arbitration]]====
Text text text
[[User:MBisanz|MBisanz]] has submitted a case for review into alleged misconduct by [User:Fæ|Fæ]]. This comes after [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&oldid=490513556#Arbitrators.27_opinion_on_hearing_this_matter_.280.2F9.2F1.2F2.29 another case] involving the two users and alleged misconduct was rejected by the committee.

===Other requests and committee actions===
* The Arbitration Committee has resolved by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions&oldid=494112559#Motion_2 motion] that users who are named parties and other parties submitting evidence shall limit their submissions 1000 and 500 words respectively, in addition, evidence must be presented on the case's /Evidence subpage. Clerks may refactor submissions significantly over the limit at the discretion of the clerks and Committee.


<noinclude>{{Wikipedia:Signpost/Template:Signpost-article-comments-end||2012-05-21|2012-06-04}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{Wikipedia:Signpost/Template:Signpost-article-comments-end||2012-05-21|2012-06-04}}</noinclude>

Revision as of 00:32, 26 May 2012

The Signpost
← Back to Contents
View Latest Issue


Arbitration report

No open arbitration cases

Contribute  —  
Share this
By M.O.X

The Arbitration Committee has neither closed nor opened any cases for two weeks.

Pending cases

Fæ request for arbitration

MBisanz has submitted a case for review into alleged misconduct by [User:Fæ|Fæ]]. This comes after another case involving the two users and alleged misconduct was rejected by the committee.

Other requests and committee actions

  • The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that users who are named parties and other parties submitting evidence shall limit their submissions 1000 and 500 words respectively, in addition, evidence must be presented on the case's /Evidence subpage. Clerks may refactor submissions significantly over the limit at the discretion of the clerks and Committee.
← Previous "Arbitration report"
Next "Arbitration report" →
+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.

Please correct the statement to be a request for a meeting with Gregory Kohs rather than having had a meeting with Eric Barbour. See my correction at User_talk:Fæ#Request_for_arbitration. --Fæ (talk) 06:23, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thanks. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 5:31pm • 07:31, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The current version makes it sound as if the meeting already happened. Please see thekohser's reply. Wikimania 2012 is in July 2012. As far as I'm aware, there aren't any definite plans for a meeting; there's only musings. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 12:13, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ah sorry for the misunderstanding, I've corrected it accordingly. Thanks Michael! —James (Talk • Contribs) • 9:35am • 23:35, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. It was just musings. Given my travel plans for this summer, I was unable to commit to anything more concrete and lost the email thread into the background noise of my life. MBisanz talk 17:08, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not sure if it's relevant, but perhaps the GoodDay RFAR request should mention that I am their mentor? Steven Zhang Get involved in DR! 14:39, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ah yes, I've edited the section accordingly, thanks Steven! :) —James (Talk • Contribs) • 9:35am • 23:35, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Kohs, the film producer? Why should anyone care if a Wikipedia editor is meeting with him? Delicious carbuncle (talk) 11:34, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, the ex-Wikipedia user. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 4:25pm • 06:25, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A film producer would be appropriate, due to the massive drama production about to take place (melodrama? soap opera? geek tragedy?) -- Seth Finkelstein (talk) 09:16, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
For those lucky enough not to know, "our" Gregory Kohs is a banned user of some disrepute, who frequents the same WP:BADSITES as Delicious Carbuncle. DC's comment may therefore be taken as tongue in cheek. Rich Farmbrough, 12:16, 30 May 2012 (UTC).[reply]
  • Note: Two requests for amendment in my recent case are outstanding. Currently they are looking like they will be turned dowon without reason. Rich Farmbrough, 13:21, 30 May 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Please correct the links regarding GoodDay; they should point to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GoodDay, not to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#GoodDay. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:18, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sorry about that, at the time I wrote it it was still pending review. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 9:10pm • 11:10, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


The Signpost is looking for new talent.
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special%3ADiff%2F494392730

Leave a Reply