HelloAnnyong (talk | contribs) Endorsing for checkuser attention |
results |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|checked}} |
||
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> |
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> |
||
{{SPIarchive notice|Mmann1988}} |
{{SPIarchive notice|Mmann1988}} |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
||
*{{Endorse}} - Likely, but I'll endorse to confirm that Mmann is evading their block. — [[User:HelloAnnyong|'''<span style="color: #aaa">Hello</span><span style="color: #666">Annyong</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:HelloAnnyong|(say whaaat?!)]]</sup> 02:57, 7 January 2012 (UTC) |
*{{Endorse}} - Likely, but I'll endorse to confirm that Mmann is evading their block. — [[User:HelloAnnyong|'''<span style="color: #aaa">Hello</span><span style="color: #666">Annyong</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:HelloAnnyong|(say whaaat?!)]]</sup> 02:57, 7 January 2012 (UTC) |
||
*Unfortunately, the technical evidence does not add much to this, but it is not impossible and the behaviour is extremely suggestive. [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] ([[User talk:WilliamH|talk]]) 03:54, 7 January 2012 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
---- |
||
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
Revision as of 03:54, 7 January 2012
– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.
Mmann1988
- Mmann1988 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Populated account categories: suspected
06 January 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- ATLcolts99 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
User Mmann 1988 was suspended for two weeks for using a sockpuppet during an edit war. Subsequent to his suspension he also used another sockpuppet. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mmann1988/Archive. Now, literally the minute that I am improving a subject that he is very sensitive about (Culture of Atlanta: I am creating logical topic pages for the various more or less unrelated subjects on that page), a new user appears, User:ATLcolts99. This "new user" is suggesting that what I am doing is not "consistent" with how it is done other cities. It is very suspicious that an entirely new user would have such a strong opinion on how such topics are classified or that they would feel strongly enough to comment on my Talk page. Oh, and now he is editing an article that I just created, Museums in Atlanta, "fixing the bullets" since he thinks that that's not how articles should appear on Wikipedia. It's very strange indeed that a new user would be so concerned about a formatting issues such as prose vs. bullets Keizers (talk) 21:14, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
And now he's removed information about African Americans from the Atlanta metropolitan area article, which is his hallmark. He does not permit information about African Americans to be added, it irks him. Keizers (talk) 21:27, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Clerk endorsed - Likely, but I'll endorse to confirm that Mmann is evading their block. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 02:57, 7 January 2012 (UTC)- Unfortunately, the technical evidence does not add much to this, but it is not impossible and the behaviour is extremely suggestive. WilliamH (talk) 03:54, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
