– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

Mmann1988 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: suspected

03 January 2012

Suspected sockpuppets

• RodewayInn (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Talk:Atlanta#RFC_of_.22Black_Mecca.22 and Talk:Atlanta#Sock_puppet_RodewayInn, this is all in connection with a dispute over use of the term "black mecca" (and what may be a larger racist agenda) - see Talk:Atlanta other entries for details Keizers (talk) 15:32, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. I have no relation to this user, and he is certainly not a sock puppet. On what basis is this claim made? Because edits have similar times? This is ridiculous. I have been involved in edit wars before (check my history) and in those cases I never made a sock puppet. Why would I do it now?--Mmann1988 (talk) 16:47, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would like a re-check. I had an issue with use of the term "black mecca" in the lead, but I never challenged the use of "mecca" in the overall article.--Mmann1988 (talk) 16:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

It is  Likely these two are the same:

• RodewayInn (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Mmann1988 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) TNXMan 15:58, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]