Good Olfactory (talk | contribs) →Requested move: support |
|||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
Responce appreciated. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/212.124.173.7|212.124.173.7]] ([[User talk:212.124.173.7|talk]]) 15:53, 25 November 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Responce appreciated. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/212.124.173.7|212.124.173.7]] ([[User talk:212.124.173.7|talk]]) 15:53, 25 November 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:Hmmm, i would say yes... --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:WhiteWriter |WhiteWriter ]]<sup>[[User talk:WhiteWriter |speaks]]</sup></span> 16:16, 25 November 2011 (UTC) |
:Hmmm, i would say yes... --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:WhiteWriter |WhiteWriter ]]<sup>[[User talk:WhiteWriter |speaks]]</sup></span> 16:16, 25 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
== KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces == |
|||
KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it has fought ex-KLA forces. It is a force sent to impose a peace in Kosovo upon ethnic Albanian and Serb militants. see this reference: [http://books.google.ca/books?id=lEuAsrRADOoC&pg=PA373&dq=kfor+serbia&hl=en&ei=1u_TTpriIaXW0QH89-BM&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CFIQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=kfor%20serbia&f=false] |
Revision as of 20:37, 28 November 2011
Kosovo Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Serbia Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
International relations Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Serbia involvment
I am not sure if Republic of Serbia is officially involved in conflicts. Kosovo Serbs are, however, Serbian Goverment participates only in negotiations and does not support rebelion.--DustBGD89-3 (talk) 21:15, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
New name
2011 North Kosovo crisis is more descriptive--93.137.112.209 (talk) 16:49, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
- Feel free to start a requested move. Jenks24 (talk) 17:38, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Title
There is no border between central Serbia and Kosovo and Metohia, just an administrative line. Border implies two equal entities. However, Kosovo and Metohia is regarded by majority of UN members as autonomous province of Serbia under temporary international rule, based on UN Resolution 1244. Also, former title implied that Serbia was somehow involved in the incidents which is not the case. Perunova straža (talk) 12:14, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Further edits are done on order to have wording that represents the real situation, based on international law, treaties and documents, instead of one-sided biased view. Perunova straža (talk) 12:19, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Edits explained
- unexplained[1][2]
- unexplained an dunsourced[3]
- per title sectio above and pov[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]
- edit war without consensus to restore
- pov
- not done
- 2 words?Lihaas (talk) 04:40, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Requested move
2011 Kosovo–Serbia border clashes → 2011 North Kosovo crisis –
Entire situation is by far bigger then just border or administrative line, and at the end, new title is NPOV, as Serbia's POV is that we dont have border between Kosovo and Serbia, but just administrative line. All sources points that North Kosovo is location of this events, and not just thin line in question... --WhiteWriter speaks 01:15, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- Comment. Has it really been commonly described as a "crisis", though? I've heard much talk of "clashes", but not a "crisis". Good Ol’factory (talk) 06:20, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- Well, there is numerous sources for this. CHRONOLOGY OF CRISIS IN NORTHERN KIM, Solution to North Kosovo Crisis "In Sight", The northern Kosovo crisis, "Sides close to solution to north Kosovo crisis", etc, etc... --WhiteWriter speaks 16:21, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support. After a bit of googling around, it does seem to me that the proposed name is more common, and it has the benefit of neutrality to boot. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:19, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Third phase?
Should we consider these new attacks as a phase number three? Responce appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.124.173.7 (talk) 15:53, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hmmm, i would say yes... --WhiteWriter speaks 16:16, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it is officially neutral, it has fought with ex-KLA forces as well as Serb forces
KFOR is not a pro-Albanian force, it has fought ex-KLA forces. It is a force sent to impose a peace in Kosovo upon ethnic Albanian and Serb militants. see this reference: [13]