Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk | contribs) →On extension: ok |
Deliriousandlost (talk | contribs) →On extension: on the extension ending DURING my writing my vote but not getting an edit conflict. |
||
| Line 190: | Line 190: | ||
For those who don't have it watchlisted, please note that this discussion has continued at the [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard#Crat_chat|Bureaucrats' noticeboard]]. -- '''''[[User:Lear's Fool|Lear's]] [[User Talk:Lear's Fool|Fool]]''''' 03:09, 6 January 2011 (UTC) |
For those who don't have it watchlisted, please note that this discussion has continued at the [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard#Crat_chat|Bureaucrats' noticeboard]]. -- '''''[[User:Lear's Fool|Lear's]] [[User Talk:Lear's Fool|Fool]]''''' 03:09, 6 January 2011 (UTC) |
||
I began to write my vote maybe a minute or two before X! put it on hold. I saved my vote and found out he had closed it about 2 minutes before. So much for reading my vote to make it simple and shorter. It was a support. Not sure they will let it through. <font face="Georgia">[[User:Deliriousandlost|<font color="#ff69b4">delirious</font>]] & [[Special:Contributions/Deliriousandlost|<font color="#ff69b4">lost</font>]] ☯ [[User Talk:Deliriousandlost|<sup><font color="purple">~hugs~</font></sup>]]</font> 01:31, 9 January 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:31, 9 January 2011
Username: Lear's Fool
User groups: reviewer, rollbacker
First edit: Jul 10, 2009 04:31:29
Unique pages edited: 4,456
Average edits per page: 1.65
Live edits: 6,802
Deleted edits: 545
Total edits (including deleted): 7,347
Namespace Totals
Article 2478 36.43%
Talk 363 5.34%
User 343 5.04%
User talk 2635 38.74%
Wikipedia 903 13.28%
Wikipedia talk 28 0.41%
File 3 0.04%
Template 15 0.22%
Template talk 22 0.32%
Help 5 0.07%
Category 6 0.09%
Portal talk 1 0.01%
Namespace Totals Pie Chart
Month counts
2009/07 2
2009/08 1
2009/09 38
2009/10 18
2009/11 33
2009/12 291
2010/01 1098
2010/02 1119
2010/03 938
2010/04 896
2010/05 739
2010/06 177
2010/07 482
2010/08 221
2010/09 21
2010/10 62
2010/11 165
2010/12 501
Top edited pages
Article
* 24 - John_O'Reily
* 16 - Patricia_Petersen
* 13 - Robert_Spence_(bishop)
* 12 - Andrew_Killian
* 10 - On_Dit
* 10 - Philip_Wilson_(archbishop)
* 9 - Wisconsin_Education_Association_Council
* 8 - South_Australian_referendum,_1896
* 8 - Union_Hall_(Adelaide)
* 7 - Badger_Boys_State
Talk
* 33 - Australian_federal_election,_2010
* 12 - Kevin_Rudd
* 12 - Mike_Rann
* 12 - Isobel_Redmond
* 9 - Julia_Gillard
* 9 - Michael_Atkinson/draft
* 7 - Socialist_Alternative_(Australia)
* 4 - John_O'Reily
* 4 - Japanese_Cartoon_(band)
* 4 - Michael_Atkinson
User
* 100 - Lear's_Fool
* 38 - Lear's_Fool/Sandbox1
* 37 - Lear's_Fool/monobook.js
* 19 - Lear's_Fool/Side_Banner
* 19 - Lear's_Fool/To_Do
* 15 - Lear's_Fool/huggle.css
* 9 - Lear's_Fool/Matthew_Beovich
* 7 - CorenSearchBot/manual
* 7 - Lear's_Fool/Headers
* 5 - Lear's_Fool/Userboxes
User talk
* 112 - Lear's_Fool
* 46 - Lear's_Fool/Sandbox2
* 17 - Timeshift9
* 16 - Lear's_Fool/Headers
* 10 - Pdfpdf
* 8 - RogerZoel
* 8 - Mysdaao
* 7 - 24.128.111.134
* 6 - MaxWeberJr
* 6 - Jkelner2009
Wikipedia
* 162 - Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism
* 17 - Requests_for_adminship/Lear's_Fool
* 17 - Help_desk
* 13 - Articles_for_deletion/Rafael_Nadal_in_2010
* 13 - WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Bands_and_musicians
* 11 - WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/India
* 10 - WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Australia
* 10 - WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/People
* 10 - WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Music
* 10 - Articles_for_deletion/Steven_Slater
Wikipedia talk
* 10 - Criteria_for_speedy_deletion
* 6 - WikiProject_Australian_politics
* 2 - Copyright_problems
* 2 - Child_protection
* 2 - Requests_for_adminship
* 1 - Articles_for_creation/Chronic_Sinusitis_Treatments
* 1 - AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage
* 1 - Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Assessment
* 1 - User_pages
* 1 - Twinkle
File
* 1 - TransporterBridgeMbro.jpg
* 1 - Hero_Fiennes-Tiffin_in_Harry_Potter_preview.jpg
* 1 - Adelaide_University_Union_Hall_2010-04c.jpg
Template
* 5 - Bishops_and_Archbishops_of_the_Roman_Catholic_Arch...
* 2 - Infobox_cardinal
* 2 - Infobox_cardinal/doc
* 1 - Players_Championship_Finals
* 1 - Post-it_medium/post_it
* 1 - Talkpage_header
* 1 - Main_Page_toolbox/doc
* 1 - Centralized_discussion
* 1 - Celtic_F.C._managers
Template talk
* 22 - Did_you_know
Help
* 3 - Pending_changes
* 1 - Edit_toolbar
* 1 - Wiki_markup
Category
* 1 - Artificial_ecosystems
* 1 - United_States_Senators_from_South_Carolina
* 1 - Madagascar_at_the_Olympics
* 1 - People_from_Stoke-on-Trent
* 1 - Wikipedians_by_alma_mater:_Manipal_University
* 1 - Jurassic_reptiles
Portal talk
* 1 - Biography
Question #6
Wow what a tough question! It's essentially asking how you would balance your dedication to Wikipedia versus a BLP subject's personal wishes but the hypothetical situation it's framed in is plausible and really well thought out. Good one fetchcomms. -- Ϫ 13:07, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
On extension
I have extended the RFA discussion by 3 days. To me, the consensus is simply not clear on this one. The addition of 3 supports and 1 oppose after the scheduled ending signaled to me that there's still discussion left to have. That being said, my decision was not motivated by indecisiveness, but because I believe that the fundamental questions a crat asks when he/she closes an RFA are not being satisfactorily answered by any section. I can't say whether I speak for my colleagues, but I believe that this is a case where more time is helpful. bibliomaniac15 02:05, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not sure asking people to bicker over this for 3 more days (to see which side gets tired of arguing first?) will be the least bit productive. It's been seven days; the strongest arguments on each side have been stated. The candidate deserves a decision. Townlake (talk) 02:12, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- My oppose may have been added after the deadline -- I didn't check first. If it will help speed things along I'm willing to withdraw it. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 02:16, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- !votes at RFA are traditionally accepted even past the deadline. The closing time is an "on or after" type of deal.--Chaser (talk) 03:55, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- Ok. My thought was that a delay like this can't be pleasant for the candidate so I don't want to stand in the way of closure. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 04:25, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- !votes at RFA are traditionally accepted even past the deadline. The closing time is an "on or after" type of deal.--Chaser (talk) 03:55, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- My oppose may have been added after the deadline -- I didn't check first. If it will help speed things along I'm willing to withdraw it. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 02:16, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
(crossposting from BN) Personally, I'm not sure that this was the best idea. Both sides have had 7 days to extend their opinions. Extending it further only makes this RfA more of a war of attrition - which side will give up first? There's nothing that extending will achieve except for making hell week a hell weekplus3days. This idea has already been shown by other areas of WP. Unless new info comes up, which has not happened here, extending a closing time does not change consensus. (X! · talk) · @139 · 02:19, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
For those who don't have it watchlisted, please note that this discussion has continued at the Bureaucrats' noticeboard. -- Lear's Fool 03:09, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
I began to write my vote maybe a minute or two before X! put it on hold. I saved my vote and found out he had closed it about 2 minutes before. So much for reading my vote to make it simple and shorter. It was a support. Not sure they will let it through. delirious & lost ☯ ~hugs~ 01:31, 9 January 2011 (UTC)