• Talk archive: 2007–10
• Bot generated notices: 2010

You appear to be mass creating articles about Indian villages. Some of these have no indication of notability. Please note that these kind of mass creations need prior approval by the bot approval group, which it doesn't appear you've consulted with. Please stop this mass creation without prior discussion. Shadowjams (talk) 09:00, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I`m not using bot or semi automated tools to create articles. How can I get the authorization?--Александр Мотин (talk) 09:03, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've massively created articles of questionable notability. For the bot question you might investigate Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval. As a general issue, I'd suggest you slow down an expand upon some of the articles you've already created. Shadowjams (talk) 09:07, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will look into it.--Александр Мотин (talk) 09:18, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The next step is ANI. Is your response a joke? "I will look into it". You aren't in control of this account? It's this account I'm referring to. Shadowjams (talk) 10:10, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I asked advice from User:Starzynka because you make me to get approval form bot approval group. But I told that I do not use automated or semi automated tools to create articles. Also your phrase "questionable notability" seems to be unclear for me.--Александр Мотин (talk) 10:24, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I requested autopatrolled rights — Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled. It will help to reduce the workload of new page patrollers. If you have claim regarding notability of my stubs we can discuss it here.--Александр Мотин (talk) 12:58, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your autopatrol request has been granted.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); September 17, 2010; 13:41 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Parishwad, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.rericjournal.ait.ac.th/index.php/reric/article/view/258/0.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:57, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Patagundi, and it appears to be a substantial copy of https://www.vedamsbooks.com/no52728.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:57, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's a (weird) false positive. I have removed the copyvio tag from the stub in question. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); September 17, 2010; 14:02 (UTC)

I think I`ll get lots of this kind of stuff.--Александр Мотин (talk) 14:04, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll notify the bot owner. The stub text doesn't even appear on the pages in question. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); September 17, 2010; 14:05 (UTC)

Thanks. These false positives distracts me so much.--Александр Мотин (talk) 14:07, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You don't need authorise for manual stubs. You are now on good list so no problem. As you see there are a few editors who oppose mass stubs but a lot like you and me who think this very important for future growth and potential of project. You are welcome to help me stub articles. Keep up good work, it encourages me alsoStarzynka (talk) 14:42, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]