Misconceptions2 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Report date December 8 2009, 16:35 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

• Български360 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 188.221.108.172 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• Admit-the-truth (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 86.18.223.124 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

Evidence submitted by Notedgrant

The IPs or users above add the same content on the article Muhammad and assassinations and others (Though the latest account may be a bit different but he is a sock and easily passes the duck test) They edit the same articles and try to show that a group of editors favor their POV.They have been adding copyright content to the article the IPs and users were blocked for it A new account User:Български360 surfaced whose first edit is quite similar to user:Misconceptions2s first edit He has been editing the same article too They maybe sock or meat puppets. user:Misconceptions2 is the same as the ip user:188.221.108.172 per this while the IP and users have a history swaying consensus per this afd where both the IPs and one of the users voted--NotedGrant Talk 16:35, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties

This is not fair, i did not vandalise anything, i am not sock puppetry.

Also, I just added something here to defend myself and it was removed a minute ago.This is bullshit ( i bet i will get banned for this, but this really is bullshit, i add comments here, and it gets removed!!! no point)

NotedGrant just wants his point of view. i am not even criticisng islam, i added a NPOV and he deletes the reference

Also the reason i edited those pages is because it was advertise on faithfredom, to show people about islam.

Also Assassinations of Muhammad article had data + references removed by Noted Grant. he just wants his POV--Български360 (talk) 17:08, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FINALLY I WANT TO SAY THAT NOTED GRANT IS SUCH A BIG LIAR, I DID NOT MAKE ANY EDITS ON "MUHAMMAD AND ASSASSINATIONS", check the history, unless his reffering to the comment i left on the discussion page.

CommentThis is not WP:DR this is a serious case of sockpuppetry where a user after being blocked edits the same article for which he was repeatedly blocked (A case of wp:copyvio.Please do not add OR or unpublished synthesis of published material-NotedGrant Talk 17:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Conclusions

 Administrator note User:Български360 and User:Admit-the-truth indefinitely blocked and tagged. I'll leave the block on the sockmaster and the IPs as-is and see what happens; if they come back. Then longer blocks may be needed. MuZemike 17:43, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It will be archived after its final review by a Clerk or Checkuser.

{{SPIclose}} is deprecated. Please change the parameter in the {{SPI case status}} to "close" instead.