Reverted to revision 330488060 by Български360; My mistake: mistook it for vandalism. I apologize. (TW) |
Notedgrant (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
FINALLY I WANT TO SAY THAT NOTED GRANT IS SUCH A BIG LIAR, I DID NOT MAKE ANY EDITS ON "MUHAMMAD AND ASSASSINATIONS", check the history, unless his reffering to the comment i left on the discussion page. |
FINALLY I WANT TO SAY THAT NOTED GRANT IS SUCH A BIG LIAR, I DID NOT MAKE ANY EDITS ON "MUHAMMAD AND ASSASSINATIONS", check the history, unless his reffering to the comment i left on the discussion page. |
||
:'''Comment'''This is not [[WP:DR]] this is a serious case of sockpuppetry where a user after being blocked edits the same article for which he was repeatedly blocked (A case of [[wp:copyvio]].Please do not add [[WP:OR|OR]] or [[WP:SYN|unpublished synthesis of published material]]-[[User:Notedgrant|<font color="purple" face="High Tower Text">NotedGrant</font>]] [[user talk:Notedgrant|<font color="orange" >Talk</font>]] 17:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>====== |
Revision as of 17:19, 8 December 2009
Misconceptions2
- Misconceptions2 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date December 8 2009, 16:35 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- Български360 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Admit-the-truth (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Notedgrant
The IPs or users above add the same content on the article Muhammad and assassinations and others (Though the latest account may be a bit different but he is a sock and easily passes the duck test) They edit the same articles and try to show that a group of editors favor their POV.They have been adding copyright content to the article the IPs and users were blocked for it A new account User:Български360 surfaced whose first edit is quite similar to user:Misconceptions2s first edit He has been editing the same article too They maybe sock or meat puppets. user:Misconceptions2 is the same as the ip user:188.221.108.172 per this while the IP and users have a history swaying consensus per this afd where both the IPs and one of the users voted--NotedGrant Talk 16:35, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
This is not fair, i did not vandalise anything, i am not sock puppetry.
Also, I just added something here to defend myself and it was removed a minute ago.This is bullshit ( i bet i will get banned for this, but this really is bullshit, i add comments here, and it gets removed!!! no point)
NotedGrant just wants his point of view. i am not even criticisng islam, i added a NPOV and he deletes the reference
Also the reason i edited those pages is because it was advertise on faithfredom, to show people about islam.
Also Assassinations of Muhammad article had data + references removed by Noted Grant. he just wants his POV--Български360 (talk) 17:08, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
FINALLY I WANT TO SAY THAT NOTED GRANT IS SUCH A BIG LIAR, I DID NOT MAKE ANY EDITS ON "MUHAMMAD AND ASSASSINATIONS", check the history, unless his reffering to the comment i left on the discussion page.
- CommentThis is not WP:DR this is a serious case of sockpuppetry where a user after being blocked edits the same article for which he was repeatedly blocked (A case of wp:copyvio.Please do not add OR or unpublished synthesis of published material-NotedGrant Talk 17:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC)