Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
66.44.127.157 (talk)
m Reverted edits by 66.44.127.157 to last revision by 65.110.229.46 (HG)
Line 15: Line 15:
__TOC__
__TOC__


==Reports==
whats up my negro
I was changing stuff so that the rest of my physics class would get the wrong answers.
===Unknown User===
I have forgotten my username (I believe it was along the lines of CatDUDE#5 something like that). I tried to add some basic info on the French Revolution when I tried to save and the change was ruled unconstructive and dissallowed. The change is in fact true and rather constructive.
:Well, it was because your edit included "SHIT" in all capitals. I ''think'' (can't be sure) that it would go through if it had been lowercase, but I can't really guarantee that other editors would like that (even if it is true). The [[Wikipedia:Profanity|profanity manual of style]] recommends descriptive language rather than direct quotes for things like this, although it is not a binding policy either. -- ''<B>[[User:Soap|Soap]]</B>'' <sup>[[User talk:Soap|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Soap|Contributions]]</sub> 15:38, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
::(Note: the above edit was added by [[Special:Contributions/99.141.4.16|99.141.4.16]]. -- ''<B>[[User:Soap|Soap]]</B>'' <sup>[[User talk:Soap|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Soap|Contributions]]</sub> 15:40, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

=== gudemadp ===
;Username
: {{user| gudemadp }} ({{plainlinks|URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchUser={{urlencode: gudemadp }}|NAME=filter log}})
;Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
: [[ Metastasis suppressor ]] ({{plainlinks|URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchTitle={{urlencode: Metastasis suppressor }}|NAME=filter log}})
;Description
: I was attempting to extend off of the current stub, but when I went to cite my refferences it kept kicking to this false positive thing I don't know what that means. I am not a frequent wikipedia user I have to do this for a class project it needs to be turned in asap how to I fix this? [[User:Gudemadp|Gudemadp]] ([[User talk:Gudemadp|talk]]) 23:55, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
;Date and time
: 23:55, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
;Comments
Your edit looks great; just make sure you don't remove the ==References== and {{tl|reflist}} lines from the original. That's what you were doing, and that's what was causing the filter to trigger. As an aside, the references you were attempting to add weren't formatted correctly either (you used one big [ref] ... [/ref] sequence when they're supposed to be individual, and you put them all at the end when (ideally at least) they should be tacked on as footnotes after each statement they refer to), but that can be fixed once you make the edit. -- ''<B>[[User:Soap|Soap]]</B>'' <sup>[[User talk:Soap|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Soap|Contributions]]</sub> 00:38, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

=== Hamac ===
;Username
: {{user|Hamac}} ({{plainlinks|URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchUser={{urlencode:Hamac}}|NAME=filter log}})
;Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
: [[Hamac (Adeyeye Muyiwa)]] ({{plainlinks|URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchTitle={{urlencode:Hamac (Adeyeye Muyiwa)}}|NAME=filter log}})
;Description
: What you were doing [[User:Hamac|Hamac]] ([[User talk:Hamac|talk]]) 04:20, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
;Date and time
: 04:20, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
;Comments
You can put that content on your [[User:Hamac|userpage]] if you want to, but as an article, I don't think it would stand up to the [[WP:N|notability]] and [[WP:V|verifiability]] requirements for autobiographies. The reason your edit was disallowed was because "mainspace" articles are watched for things like this; however, userspace is much more free. -- ''<B>[[User:Soap|Soap]]</B>'' <sup>[[User talk:Soap|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Soap|Contributions]]</sub> 04:24, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

===Exernial===
;Username
: {{user|Exernial}} ({{plainlinks|URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchUser={{urlencode:Exernial}}|NAME=filter log}})
;Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
: [[User:Exernial]] ({{plainlinks|URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchTitle={{urlencode:User:Exernial}}|NAME=filter log}})
;Description
: On my userpage??? My userpage???! I was adding some about me stuff, no offensive material at all or anything, unless I've made some mistakes I didn't realize?
;Date and time
: 19:35, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
;Comments
I'm afraid <nowiki>[big][big][big]</nowiki> has been disallowed because too many people use it to vandalize (even on (other people's) userpages). As soon as you get [[WP:autoconfirmed|autoconfirmed]] (4 days and ten edits) you'll be considered "trusted enough" to be able to use that particular HTML tag. Also, the BIG tag doesn't always render properly on some browsers; you might want to consider using <nowiki>[span style="font-size: 40px;"]</nowiki> or something similar since you can be sure everyone will see it properly. Or type <nowiki>[big][big][b][/b][big]</nowiki>; it will work more or less the same. (Note: all [ ] brackets in the above should be replaced with < >.)-- ''<B>[[User:Soap|Soap]]</B>'' <sup>[[User talk:Soap|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Soap|Contributions]]</sub> 19:47, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
:<small>(Note: this filter is a private filter, but I felt it was OK to explain exactly what triggered it because what you wrote was exactly the same as one of the things it was designed to catch, so no new "secret" information has been let out.) -- ''<B>[[User:Soap|Soap]]</B>'' <sup>[[User talk:Soap|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Soap|Contributions]]</sub> 20:10, 5 December 2009 (UTC)</small>
:: I excluded User namespace from this filter. [[User:Ruslik0|Ruslik]]_[[User Talk:Ruslik0|<span style="color:red">Zero</span>]] 20:39, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

=== 96.251.85.72 ===
;Username
: {{user| 96.251.85.72 }} ({{plainlinks|URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchUser={{urlencode: 96.251.85.72 }}|NAME=filter log}})
;Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
: [[ Talk:John_Forbes_Nash,_Jr.#.22Fuck_You_Buddy.22 ]] ({{plainlinks|URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchTitle={{urlencode: Talk:John_Forbes_Nash,_Jr.#.22Fuck_You_Buddy.22 }}|NAME=filter log}})
;Description
: Adding a comment to the Talk page to raise some (hopefully ''constructive)'' questions about the associated article. Certainly I was not engaged in vandalism-- note that I did not attempt to edit the article itself, but instead left it to those more involved with Wikipedia to decide. [[Special:Contributions/96.251.85.72|96.251.85.72]] ([[User talk:96.251.85.72|talk]]) 17:37, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
;Date and time
: 17:37, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
;Comments
<!-- Please leave this area blank for now, but be prepared to answer questions left by reviewing editors. Thanks! -->
: It is because of "Fuck You Buddy" in the edit summary. If you do not use such an edit summary, you will not receive a warning the next time. [[User:Ruslik0|Ruslik]]_[[User Talk:Ruslik0|<span style="color:red">Zero</span>]] 19:33, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

=== 98.248.61.157 ===
;Username
: {{user|98.248.61.157}} ({{plainlinks|URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchUser={{urlencode: 98.248.61.157}}|NAME=filter log}})
;Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
: [[Storm Chasers (TV series)]] ({{plainlinks|URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchTitle={{urlencode: Storm Chasers (TV series)}}|NAME=filter log}})
;Description
: I wanted the episodes separate from the main article, so I've created the article [[List of Storm Chasers episodes]] [[Special:Contributions/98.248.61.157|98.248.61.157]] ([[User talk:98.248.61.157|talk]]) 04:59, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
;Date and time
: 04:59, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
;Comments
There is no way for the filter to be able to tell the difference between legitimate removals and vandalism. Please don't feel as if you're being classified as a vandal; tags are just a convenient way for us to alert ourselves to various actions that could be acts of vandalism. You can go ahead and make the edit if you like; however, your edit may be reversed if the current state of the article is one that has been decided on by previous editors; if so I recommend going to [[Talk:Storm Chasers (TV series)|the talk page]] and explaining what you want to do and why. -- ''<B>[[User:Soap|Soap]]</B>'' <sup>[[User talk:Soap|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Soap|Contributions]]</sub> 14:09, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

===Buggie111===
;Username
: {{user|Buggie111}} ({{plainlinks|URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchUser={{urlencode:Buggie111}}|NAME=filter log}})
;Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
: [[Bronnitsy]] ({{plainlinks|URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchTitle={{urlencode:Bronnitsy}}|NAME=filter log}})
;Description
: Killed off red category link
;Date and time
: 20:26, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
;Comments
There is no way for the filter to be able to tell the difference between legitimate removals and vandalism. Please don't feel as if you're being classified as a vandal; tags are just a convenient way for us to alert ourselves to various actions that ''could'' be acts of vandalism. Your edit was reverted, though for a different reason than the tag would suggest: the category you removed was misspelled, and that's why it appeared that it didn't exist. -- ''<B>[[User:Soap|Soap]]</B>'' <sup>[[User talk:Soap|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Soap|Contributions]]</sub> 02:23, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:16, 8 December 2009

Please describe what you were doing when you were directed to this page by copying the following template, clicking [edit] on the section below, pasting in the report at the top of the section and filling it out

{{subst:Falsepositive|Your Username|Page you were trying to edit|Any additional info}}
Click here to report a false positive

Reports

I was changing stuff so that the rest of my physics class would get the wrong answers.

Unknown User

I have forgotten my username (I believe it was along the lines of CatDUDE#5 something like that). I tried to add some basic info on the French Revolution when I tried to save and the change was ruled unconstructive and dissallowed. The change is in fact true and rather constructive.

Well, it was because your edit included "SHIT" in all capitals. I think (can't be sure) that it would go through if it had been lowercase, but I can't really guarantee that other editors would like that (even if it is true). The profanity manual of style recommends descriptive language rather than direct quotes for things like this, although it is not a binding policy either. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 15:38, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(Note: the above edit was added by 99.141.4.16. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 15:40, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

gudemadp

Username
gudemadp (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
Metastasis suppressor (filter log)
Description
I was attempting to extend off of the current stub, but when I went to cite my refferences it kept kicking to this false positive thing I don't know what that means. I am not a frequent wikipedia user I have to do this for a class project it needs to be turned in asap how to I fix this? Gudemadp (talk) 23:55, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Date and time
23:55, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Your edit looks great; just make sure you don't remove the ==References== and {{reflist}} lines from the original. That's what you were doing, and that's what was causing the filter to trigger. As an aside, the references you were attempting to add weren't formatted correctly either (you used one big [ref] ... [/ref] sequence when they're supposed to be individual, and you put them all at the end when (ideally at least) they should be tacked on as footnotes after each statement they refer to), but that can be fixed once you make the edit. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 00:38, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hamac

Username
Hamac (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
Hamac (Adeyeye Muyiwa) (filter log)
Description
What you were doing Hamac (talk) 04:20, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Date and time
04:20, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Comments

You can put that content on your userpage if you want to, but as an article, I don't think it would stand up to the notability and verifiability requirements for autobiographies. The reason your edit was disallowed was because "mainspace" articles are watched for things like this; however, userspace is much more free. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 04:24, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Exernial

Username
Exernial (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
User:Exernial (filter log)
Description
On my userpage??? My userpage???! I was adding some about me stuff, no offensive material at all or anything, unless I've made some mistakes I didn't realize?
Date and time
19:35, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Comments

I'm afraid [big][big][big] has been disallowed because too many people use it to vandalize (even on (other people's) userpages). As soon as you get autoconfirmed (4 days and ten edits) you'll be considered "trusted enough" to be able to use that particular HTML tag. Also, the BIG tag doesn't always render properly on some browsers; you might want to consider using [span style="font-size: 40px;"] or something similar since you can be sure everyone will see it properly. Or type [big][big][b][/b][big]; it will work more or less the same. (Note: all [ ] brackets in the above should be replaced with < >.)-- Soap Talk/Contributions 19:47, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(Note: this filter is a private filter, but I felt it was OK to explain exactly what triggered it because what you wrote was exactly the same as one of the things it was designed to catch, so no new "secret" information has been let out.) -- Soap Talk/Contributions 20:10, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I excluded User namespace from this filter. Ruslik_Zero 20:39, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

96.251.85.72

Username
96.251.85.72 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
Talk:John_Forbes_Nash,_Jr.#.22Fuck_You_Buddy.22 (filter log)
Description
Adding a comment to the Talk page to raise some (hopefully constructive) questions about the associated article. Certainly I was not engaged in vandalism-- note that I did not attempt to edit the article itself, but instead left it to those more involved with Wikipedia to decide. 96.251.85.72 (talk) 17:37, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Date and time
17:37, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Comments
It is because of "Fuck You Buddy" in the edit summary. If you do not use such an edit summary, you will not receive a warning the next time. Ruslik_Zero 19:33, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

98.248.61.157

Username
98.248.61.157 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
Storm Chasers (TV series) (filter log)
Description
I wanted the episodes separate from the main article, so I've created the article List of Storm Chasers episodes 98.248.61.157 (talk) 04:59, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Date and time
04:59, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Comments

There is no way for the filter to be able to tell the difference between legitimate removals and vandalism. Please don't feel as if you're being classified as a vandal; tags are just a convenient way for us to alert ourselves to various actions that could be acts of vandalism. You can go ahead and make the edit if you like; however, your edit may be reversed if the current state of the article is one that has been decided on by previous editors; if so I recommend going to the talk page and explaining what you want to do and why. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 14:09, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Buggie111

Username
Buggie111 (talk · contribs) (filter log)
Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
Bronnitsy (filter log)
Description
Killed off red category link
Date and time
20:26, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Comments

There is no way for the filter to be able to tell the difference between legitimate removals and vandalism. Please don't feel as if you're being classified as a vandal; tags are just a convenient way for us to alert ourselves to various actions that could be acts of vandalism. Your edit was reverted, though for a different reason than the tag would suggest: the category you removed was misspelled, and that's why it appeared that it didn't exist. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 02:23, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply