Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Edge3 (talk | contribs)
→‎How to review an article: revise instructions per talk
Harej (talk | contribs)
some minor adjustments and changing around the text now that the process is in transition
Line 29: Line 29:
The nomination process has three steps:
The nomination process has three steps:
# Find the most appropriate subsection from those listed on the right. If you are not sure which section is best, use "Miscellaneous".
# Find the most appropriate subsection from those listed on the right. If you are not sure which section is best, use "Miscellaneous".
# Add '''{{tlps|GAN|2=subtopic='''''name of the '''subsection''' on this page where the article is listed'''''}}''' to the top of the nominated article's talk page. The subtopic parameter is optional, but provides a convenient link from the article talk page to the subsection on this page where the article is listed.
# Add '''{{tlsx|GAN|2=subtopic='''''name of the '''subsection''' on this page where the article is listed'''''}}''' to the top of the nominated article's talk page.
# List the article '''at the bottom''' of that subsection:
# List the article '''at the bottom''' of that subsection:
#* Copy this for the syntax: <code><nowiki>#&nbsp;{{la|ArticleName}}&nbsp;~~~~</nowiki></code>
#* Copy this for the listing: <code><nowiki>#&nbsp;{{la|ArticleName}}&nbsp;~~~~</nowiki></code>
#* Copy this for the edit summary: <code>Nominating <nowiki>[[ArticleName]]</nowiki></code>
#* Copy this for the edit summary: <code>Nominating <nowiki>[[ArticleName]]</nowiki></code>


Line 58: Line 58:


=== How to review an article ===
=== How to review an article ===
When choosing an article to review, keep in mind:
* that only registered users may review articles — make sure you are logged in.
* you cannot review an article if you have made significant contributions to it prior to the review, nor can you review an article if you are the nominator.
* you should not pass an article that was put on hold by another editor without assessing the problem
* nominations towards the tops of the lists are older, and should be given higher priority.


# Paste '''<code>#:{{tlx|GAReview}} <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>''' below the entry; this avoids multiple reviews of the same article.
# Choose an article to review, noting:
# On the article talk page, follow the link in the [[Template:GA nominee|GA nominee template]] to start a review subpage. Leave an initial comment, save the subpage, and transclude that comment onto the article talk page by adding <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>Talk:''ArticleName''/GA''n''}}</code> to the bottom of the last section on the article talk page: you need to replace ''ArticleName'' and ''n'' by the name of the article and the subpage number: this is most conveniently done by copying the name of the subpage and pasting it into the edit window.
#* only registered users may review articles—make sure you are logged in;
#: Also, add your name by typing three tildes (<nowiki>~~~</nowiki>) in the "reviewer" parameter of the {{tl|GA nominee}} template, and set the status as "review".
#* you cannot review an article if you have made significant contributions to it prior to the review, nor can you review an article if you are the nominator;
#* you should not pass an article that was put on hold by another editor without assessing the problem;
#* nominations towards the tops of the lists are older, and should be given higher priority.
# Paste '''#:{{tl|GAReview}} <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>''' below the entry; this avoids multiple reviews of the same article.
#On the article talk page, follow the link in the [[Template:GA nominee|GA nominee template]] to start a review subpage. Leave an initial comment, save the subpage, and transclude that comment onto the article talk page by adding <nowiki>{{</nowiki>Talk:''ArticleName''/GA''n''}} to the bottom of the last section on the article talk page: you need to replace ''ArticleName'' and ''n'' by the name of the article and the subpage number: this is most conveniently done by copying the name of the subpage and pasting it into the edit window. Also, add your name by typing three tildes ([[User:Edge3|Edge3]] ([[User talk:Edge3|talk]])) in the "reviewer" parameter of the GA nominee template.
# Check the "[[Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles#How to review an article|quick-fail criteria]]" before reading the article in detail: if a quick fail is appropriate, add your reason to the review page and go to the '''[[#Fail|fail]]''' process; otherwise continue with the next step.
# Check the "[[Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles#How to review an article|quick-fail criteria]]" before reading the article in detail: if a quick fail is appropriate, add your reason to the review page and go to the '''[[#Fail|fail]]''' process; otherwise continue with the next step.
# Read the whole article, and decide whether it should '''[[#Pass|pass]]''' or '''[[#Fail|fail]]''' based on the criteria [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|listed here]]. You can also put the article "'''[[#On Hold|On Hold]]'''" or ask for a '''[[#Second opinion|second opinion]]'''. If you wish, you can inform the nominator of your actions (e.g., using {{tls|GANotice}}). The template {{tls|FGAN}} may help you organize the critique. You can also use {{tls|GAList}} or {{tls|GAList2}} to generate a checklist.
# Read the whole article, and decide whether it should '''[[#Pass|pass]]''' or '''[[#Fail|fail]]''' based on the criteria [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|listed here]]. You can also put the article "'''[[#On Hold|On Hold]]'''" or ask for a '''[[#Second opinion|second opinion]]'''. If you wish, you can inform the nominator of your actions (e.g., using {{tlsx|GANotice}}). The template {{tlsx|FGAN}} may help you organize the critique. You can also use {{tlsx|GAList}} or {{tlsx|GAList2}} to generate a checklist.
# Reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to fix problems with the article under review.
# Reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to fix problems with the article under review.


Line 80: Line 81:
# Ensure you have provided a detailed review of the article, giving an overview of how you believe it fulfills the [[WP:WIAGA|Good article criteria]], with suggestions to improve it if you can. Please also encourage the successful nominator(s) to review an article themselves.
# Ensure you have provided a detailed review of the article, giving an overview of how you believe it fulfills the [[WP:WIAGA|Good article criteria]], with suggestions to improve it if you can. Please also encourage the successful nominator(s) to review an article themselves.
# Remove the article from the nominations list using the edit summary "Passed <nowiki>[[ArticleName]]</nowiki>".
# Remove the article from the nominations list using the edit summary "Passed <nowiki>[[ArticleName]]</nowiki>".
# Replace {{tlp|GA nominee|2=...{{!}}subtopic={{!}}page=}} on the article's talk page by '''{{tlp|GA|2=<nowiki>~~~~~</nowiki>{{!}}topic={{!}}page=}}'''.<ref name="oldid and topic"> The five tildes supply the date of the review. The topic parameter refers to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Uncategorized Good articles task force#Categories|topic abbreviations]] used on the GA page, but the template automatically converts GAN subtopics into GA topics, so reviewers can simply copy the parameter value from one template to the other. "Page" should be the number of the review subpage (that is, the ''n'' in <nowiki>{{</nowiki>Talk:''ArticleName''/GA''n''}}).</ref> Please include "GA" in your edit summary.
# Replace {{tlx|GA nominee|2=...{{!}}subtopic={{!}}page=}} on the article's talk page with '''{{tlx|GA|2=<nowiki>~~~~~</nowiki>{{!}}topic={{!}}page=}}'''.<ref name="oldid and topic"> The five tildes supply the date of the review. The topic parameter refers to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Uncategorized Good articles task force#Categories|topic abbreviations]] used on the GA page, but the template automatically converts GAN subtopics into GA topics, so reviewers can simply copy the parameter value from one template to the other. "Page" should be the number of the review subpage (that is, the ''n'' in <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>Talk:''ArticleName''/GA''n''}}).</code></ref> Please include "GA" in your edit summary.
# List the article on [[Wikipedia:Good articles]] under the appropriate section.<ref>You may also want to update any WikiProject templates on the article talk page, but this is optional. You do not need to update the "[[Wikipedia:Good articles/recent|recently listed good articles]]" page: this will be done automatically by a bot.</ref>
# List the article on [[Wikipedia:Good articles]] under the appropriate section.<ref>You may also want to update any WikiProject templates on the article talk page, but this is optional. You do not need to update the "[[Wikipedia:Good articles/recent|recently listed good articles]]" page: this will be done automatically by a bot.</ref>
| style="padding:0.7em; border:1px solid #107020; background-color:#f0ffea; vertical-align:top;" |
| style="padding:0.7em; border:1px solid #107020; background-color:#f0ffea; vertical-align:top;" |
Line 90: Line 91:
# If the problem is easy to resolve, it might be better to [[WP:Be bold|be bold]] and fix it yourself. Otherwise state which criteria were not met on the article's talk page. Please detail the article's flaws to help other editors improve the article for another GA nomination.
# If the problem is easy to resolve, it might be better to [[WP:Be bold|be bold]] and fix it yourself. Otherwise state which criteria were not met on the article's talk page. Please detail the article's flaws to help other editors improve the article for another GA nomination.
# Remove the article from the nominations list using the edit summary "Failed <nowiki>[[Article Name]]</nowiki>".
# Remove the article from the nominations list using the edit summary "Failed <nowiki>[[Article Name]]</nowiki>".
# Replace {{tlp|GA nominee|2=...{{!}}subtopic={{!}}page=}} on the article's talk page by '''{{tlp|FailedGA|2=<nowiki>~~~~~</nowiki>{{!}}topic={{!}}page=}}'''.<ref name="oldid and topic" /> Please include "GA" in your edit summary.
# Replace {{tlx|GA nominee|2=...{{!}}subtopic={{!}}page=}} on the article's talk page with '''{{tlx|FailedGA|2=<nowiki>~~~~~</nowiki>{{!}}topic={{!}}page=}}'''.<ref name="oldid and topic" /> Please include "GA" in your edit summary.


|-
|-
Line 100: Line 101:
You may put an article "'''On Hold'''" for a period of time:
You may put an article "'''On Hold'''" for a period of time:


# Copy and paste the following below the nomination entry:<br/>'''<nowiki> #: {{GAReview|status=onhold}} ~~~~</nowiki>'''
# Copy and paste the following below the nomination entry:
#: '''<code><nowiki> #: {{GAReview|status=onhold}} ~~~~</nowiki></code>'''
# On the talk page of the article set the GAN status parameter to "on hold", as in '''{{tlp|GA nominee|2=...{{!}}status=on hold}}'''
# On the talk page of the article set the GAN status parameter to "on hold", as in '''{{tlx|GA nominee|2=...{{!}}status=on hold}}'''
# '''Don't forget''' to specify on the review page what needs to be done.
# '''Don't forget''' to specify on the review page what needs to be done.
| style="padding:0.7em; border:1px solid #107020; background-color:#f0ffea; vertical-align:top;" |
| style="padding:0.7em; border:1px solid #107020; background-color:#f0ffea; vertical-align:top;" |
Line 109: Line 111:
[[Image:Symbol neutral vote.svg|right|40px]]
[[Image:Symbol neutral vote.svg|right|40px]]
If you are unsure whether an article meets the [[WP:WIAGA|Good article criteria]], you may ask another reviewer or subject expert for a second opinion:
If you are unsure whether an article meets the [[WP:WIAGA|Good article criteria]], you may ask another reviewer or subject expert for a second opinion:
# Copy and paste the following below the nomination entry:<br />'''<nowiki> #: {{GAReview|status=2nd opinion}} ~~~~</nowiki>'''
# Copy and paste the following below the nomination entry:
#: '''<code><nowiki> #: {{GAReview|status=2nd opinion}} ~~~~</nowiki></code>'''
# On the talk page of the article set the GAN status parameter to "2nd opinion" as in '''{{tlp|GA nominee|2=...{{!}}status=2nd opinion}}'''
# On the talk page of the article set the GAN status parameter to "2nd opinion" as in '''{{tlx|GA nominee|2=...{{!}}status=2nd opinion}}'''
# '''Don't forget''' to specify on the review page what needs to be done.
# '''Don't forget''' to specify on the review page what needs to be done.
|-
|-

Revision as of 22:02, 29 September 2009

Good article nominations

Good article nominations
Good article nominations

Wikipedia:Good articles is a list of articles considered to be of good standard but which are not featured article quality. This page provides a list of articles which have been nominated for consideration for good article status and instructions for nominators and reviewers. Articles can be nominated by anyone, and reviewed by any registered user who has not contributed significantly to the article. There are currently 617 nominations listed and 498 waiting to be reviewed.

How to nominate an article

If you believe an article meets the good article criteria, you may nominate it below. Before nominating your first article, you may want to read the guide for nominating good articles for extra advice.

The nomination process has three steps:

  1. Find the most appropriate subsection from those listed on the right. If you are not sure which section is best, use "Miscellaneous".
  2. Add {{subst:GAN|subtopic=name of the subsection on this page where the article is listed}} to the top of the nominated article's talk page.
  3. List the article at the bottom of that subsection:
    • Copy this for the listing: # {{la|ArticleName}} ~~~~
    • Copy this for the edit summary: Nominating [[ArticleName]]

If you've completed all three steps, then you have successfuly put your article up for Good article nomination.

It may take several weeks for your nomination to be reviewed, as there are usually many open nominations. If you are a registered user, you are encouraged to help by reviewing other articles.

Nomination categories

Arts
Language and literature
Philosophy and religion
Everyday life
Social sciences and society
Geography and places
History
Engineering and technology
Mathematics
Natural sciences
Miscellaneous (if unsure what section to use)

How to review an article

When choosing an article to review, keep in mind:

  • that only registered users may review articles — make sure you are logged in.
  • you cannot review an article if you have made significant contributions to it prior to the review, nor can you review an article if you are the nominator.
  • you should not pass an article that was put on hold by another editor without assessing the problem
  • nominations towards the tops of the lists are older, and should be given higher priority.
  1. Paste #:{{GAReview}} ~~~~ below the entry; this avoids multiple reviews of the same article.
  2. On the article talk page, follow the link in the GA nominee template to start a review subpage. Leave an initial comment, save the subpage, and transclude that comment onto the article talk page by adding {{Talk:ArticleName/GAn}} to the bottom of the last section on the article talk page: you need to replace ArticleName and n by the name of the article and the subpage number: this is most conveniently done by copying the name of the subpage and pasting it into the edit window.
    Also, add your name by typing three tildes (~~~) in the "reviewer" parameter of the {{GA nominee}} template, and set the status as "review".
  3. Check the "quick-fail criteria" before reading the article in detail: if a quick fail is appropriate, add your reason to the review page and go to the fail process; otherwise continue with the next step.
  4. Read the whole article, and decide whether it should pass or fail based on the criteria listed here. You can also put the article "On Hold" or ask for a second opinion. If you wish, you can inform the nominator of your actions (e.g., using {{subst:GANotice}}). The template {{subst:FGAN}} may help you organize the critique. You can also use {{subst:GAList}} or {{subst:GAList2}} to generate a checklist.
  5. Reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to fix problems with the article under review.

Review carefully — see Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles for more suggestions. You may also ask for the advice of a mentor.

Pass

If you feel the article meets the Good article criteria:

  1. Ensure you have provided a detailed review of the article, giving an overview of how you believe it fulfills the Good article criteria, with suggestions to improve it if you can. Please also encourage the successful nominator(s) to review an article themselves.
  2. Remove the article from the nominations list using the edit summary "Passed [[ArticleName]]".
  3. Replace {{GA nominee|...|subtopic=|page=}} on the article's talk page with {{GA|~~~~~|topic=|page=}}.[1] Please include "GA" in your edit summary.
  4. List the article on Wikipedia:Good articles under the appropriate section.[2]

Fail

If you feel the article does not meet the Good article criteria:

  1. If the problem is easy to resolve, it might be better to be bold and fix it yourself. Otherwise state which criteria were not met on the article's talk page. Please detail the article's flaws to help other editors improve the article for another GA nomination.
  2. Remove the article from the nominations list using the edit summary "Failed [[Article Name]]".
  3. Replace {{GA nominee|...|subtopic=|page=}} on the article's talk page with {{FailedGA|~~~~~|topic=|page=}}.[1] Please include "GA" in your edit summary.

On Hold

You may put an article "On Hold" for a period of time:

  1. Copy and paste the following below the nomination entry:
    #: {{GAReview|status=onhold}} ~~~~
  2. On the talk page of the article set the GAN status parameter to "on hold", as in {{GA nominee|...|status=on hold}}
  3. Don't forget to specify on the review page what needs to be done.

Second opinion

If you are unsure whether an article meets the Good article criteria, you may ask another reviewer or subject expert for a second opinion:

  1. Copy and paste the following below the nomination entry:
    #: {{GAReview|status=2nd opinion}} ~~~~
  2. On the talk page of the article set the GAN status parameter to "2nd opinion" as in {{GA nominee|...|status=2nd opinion}}
  3. Don't forget to specify on the review page what needs to be done.
  1. ^ a b The five tildes supply the date of the review. The topic parameter refers to the topic abbreviations used on the GA page, but the template automatically converts GAN subtopics into GA topics, so reviewers can simply copy the parameter value from one template to the other. "Page" should be the number of the review subpage (that is, the n in {{Talk:ArticleName/GAn}}).
  2. ^ You may also want to update any WikiProject templates on the article talk page, but this is optional. You do not need to update the "recently listed good articles" page: this will be done automatically by a bot.

Leave a Reply