Content deleted Content added
213.131.183.34 (talk) Ummm... |
83.131.88.94 (talk) No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
What exactly is the point of this 'Grapefruit' entry? |
What exactly is the point of this 'Grapefruit' entry? |
||
== Being lazy?== |
|||
I would care for a propper Wikipedia article on this fruit. |
Revision as of 14:44, 16 December 2005
Nice
While I rather like this page, isn't it a bit ironic that it's basically stating "pages should be simple" in a convoluted way? :) Radiant_>|< 10:10, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
- No. It's stating that the best explanation of a thing is the thing itself. That may lead to simpler pages, but perhaps not, if demonstration is added to analysis. This merely argues for preference to be given the demonstration. — Xiong熊talk* 16:35, 2005 August 17 (UTC)
Essay?
Isn't slapping on a link to a non-existent category just a convoluted way of being snippy? — Xiong熊talk* 16:35, 2005 August 17 (UTC)
Ummm...
What exactly is the point of this 'Grapefruit' entry?
Being lazy?
I would care for a propper Wikipedia article on this fruit.