Article contributions (210) · Did you know? (108) · Good article reviews (232) · Barnstars (55) · Scripts (31)

Archives

2004 · 2005 · 2006 · 2007 2008 (Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4) · 2009 Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr

This page has archives. Sections older than 1 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Gary, do you plan to address or respond to the concerns at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Metroid II: Return of Samus/archive1? If you don't plan to work on it further, please withdraw it to avoid wasting reviewers' time. --Laser brain (talk) 15:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alrighty then. --Laser brain (talk) 16:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since it's your project and you might have a better idea on how to integrate them into the article, I'll just give you the two magazine reviews for Metroid II that I have. These pages were from scans done by Retromags, which are better than I could've done (and save me from having to pull my old mags apart). (Megaupload link) Nall (talk) 23:58, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retromags has a bunch of gaming mags for download. It's volunteer run and doesn't have everything, but they add more over time and it's a very useful source for getting scans for any game pre-1999. Some of the downloads are pretty huge and you might have to slog through a ton of articles to find what you need, but they have a wiki that's supposed to catalog some of the content of each one. Almost all mags available have Rapidshare links, but if they don't you have to sign up and donate to get direct downloads. Magazines are saved as .cbr so you need Comic Book Reader to view them (or just change the extension to .rar and extract all the individual scans yourself). Good luck on your article! Nall (talk) 00:29, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm kinda swamped with housing/job issues for the summer right now (and at some blasted point in the future I wanna actually copyedit Star Trek: The Motion Picture and throw it at FAC), but when I have a chance I'll send you what I can scrounge up in the way of newspaper sources. --Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^(talk) 03:11, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just related to Metroid... are you planning on any FAC in the next days, or can a GTC be started? (also, if you have anything else to say here, I'm willing to hear them) igordebraga ≠ 02:04, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Three more FLRCs of FLs you nominated, but once again, you won't be able to do much:

• Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Matchbox Twenty/archive1
• Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Korn/archive1
• Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Justice/archive1 Dabomb87 (talk) 04:48, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see you removed a gallery from Fishing village. You referred to WP:IG, so I presume you think these images are "an indiscriminate collection". In fact they are anything but indiscriminate. They have been carefully selected from hundreds of possible images to show a wide spectrum of localities, time periods and types of villages, and each image has been captioned with specific information about this. The gallery captures, in a small space, more information than could be given in many paragraphs of text. --Geronimo20 (talk) 21:02, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 08:33, 4 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.[reply]

I noticed you have been editing a lot of poker articles. I'm not sure if a discussion regarding this had taken place, I disagree with your cleanup as I think it makes these articles vastly more difficult to read. Everything is jumbled together and it is difficult to determine one thought from another. I think it should be paragraphed out. One line paragraphs are easier to read and more accessible to people. A discussion should be started regarding proper clean up (if it hasnt already). Valoem ^talk 21:28, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with that. Some articles are great like Tom Dwan and Phil Ivey, however the article on Vanessa Rousso for example is definately more difficult to read. Valoem ^talk 00:50, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind I think someone edit that article looks good now. :) Valoem ^talk 00:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Due to an apparent lack of interest, the WPVG Newsletter will be switching from a monthly publication schedule to a quarterly one. The next issue be delivered on July 1, 2009, and will pertain to the second quarter of the calendar year. If you have any comments regarding this, or suggestions to improve the newsletter, please post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter.

—VG Newsletter Contributors

• Notice delivery by –xeno ^talk 14:57, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, it's nice to see you back at WP:DOH! Sure, I can get the production information for you. I'm really busy IRL right now, though, so I won't be able to do it until Sunday or next week. Is that OK? :) TheLeftorium 17:19, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You mean before the WikiCup round ends? I'm not sure if Maitch will finish Lisa the Iconoclast anytime soon. You should leave a message at his talk page. Maybe you/we can finish it for him. TheLeftorium 17:33, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, why did you remove this review? It's not obvious to me. Bearian (talk) 00:29, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How 'bout now? :) –Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I second the motion. Useight (talk) 04:33, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe soon... Gary King (talk) 05:35, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I third the motion and beg Gary to just run already so we can stop having to remember to ask him every couple months or so ;) — sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 07:00, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]