Archives

- Jul 07 - Dec 07 - Jan 08 - Apr 08 - Aug 08 - Oct 08 - Feb 09

Template:Fb start

Template:Fb end

Template:Fb start

Template:Fb end

Hi, KotNE! The article Juan David Moreno, who is claimed to play for Millonarios in the Copa Mustang, has been recreated after being prodded as being unverifiable. Do you know of any sources that might be used to verify that this chap exists and has actually played for Millonarios? Cheers, --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:00, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copy of reply at WP:FOOTY - I found this page which includes Juan David Moreno in the Medellín squad (in the grey box to the right). Other than trivial references like this linking him with the "wrong" club, I can find nothing. I'd say AfD it as unverifiable. King of the North East 19:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, KING, VASCO here,

I saw your reverting of my edit on Roger García Junyent, as i wrote Retired in currentclub, and you removed it, claming it was "...not a club". Sorry if i screwed up, but i have seen tons of articles where it appeared, and thought it was a pattern. And it does make sense after all, because i think it would be the same that has to have - CURRENTCLUB - NONE ("none" meaning the same as "retired").

Anyways, sorry for any incovenience, have a nice week,

VASCO AMARAL - --NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 00:30, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have moved several rugby categories such as Category:Widnes Vikings players to other names. It is usual practice to propose such moves at WP:CfD, if there is consensus for the move the category can be moved automatically. Changing them in the manner that you have been doing destroys the page history, could you seek consensus at CfD before you carry out any more page moves? King of the North East 23:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've still not the hang of this User talk, but here goes... There were about 40-50 players in Category:Widnes Vikings players and 40-50 players in Category:Widnes Vikings rugby league players. As the majority of teams in Category:Rugby league players by club have the suffix rugby league players, I thought it best to move 'Widnes Vikings players' manually into 'Widnes Vikings rugby league players'. If there is an automatic move, that'd be great as there are a number of other anomalies between '...players' and '...rugby league players'.

• [Team ...players ...rugby league players]
• [Bradford Bulls 90 33]
• [Castleford Tigers 90 9]
• [Huddersfield Giants 85 9]
• [Hull Kingston Rovers 83 1]
• [London Broncos 122 58] (Note the 58 are Harleguins RL)
• [Salford City Reds 83 2]
• [Wigan Warriors 95 59]

Regards

DynamoDegsy (talk) 08:47, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see that some info is wrong. The one that catches my eye is that Estudiantes home games were played in the Quilmes stadium (Quilmes), not in La Plata. There may be more... elpincha (talk) 02:50, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, at least we have a truce. Keep up the good work on the Argentine articles by the way! Also, if you've got the time, I'd appreciate more input into a proposal at The Treble (see latest section in talk page). Cheers. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 02:57, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tristan Suarez logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:16, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Football rivalries in Argentina, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, indiscriminate list. Any relevant content is already covered by the well-established Major football rivalries article

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. GiantSnowman 00:43, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KOTNE. I understand why you removed the PRODs, but I still feel the articles aren't notable, and so have taken them to an AfD discussion, where I have expanded my reasoning. Regards, GiantSnowman 01:51, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've left you a reply at the CfR discussion. Cheers. – PeeJay 22:11, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Nueva Chicago.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 22:43, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As of today, the article says 1961 and 1963... What is it? 1961 sounds more plausible... elpincha (talk) 01:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]