NOTE: IF YOU POST ANYTHING ON THIS PAGE WITHOUT A SIGNATURE, YOUR POST WILL BE DELETED WITHOUT CONSIDERATION.

I can't remember where I downloaded the photo from, but I know it's a publicity photo and can be used under fair use rules. -- Crevaner 11:29, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

What are you referring to? And on what basis am I to be blocked? Halibutt 12:23, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)

Also, I noticed your comment here. Could you please provide evidence for your accusations - or apologise? Halibutt 16:16, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)

While regarding Halibutts' recent reverts I agree they are mostly (mostly!) POINT, I am disapointed nobody seems to be interested in fixing the voting policy, which is the source of this. Sure, we can block Halibutt, make him take the entire blame for this policy (or just blame the Poles in general), but is this right? I am dissapointed by yours and many others conduct in this, you are willing to make Halibutt a scapegoat and appear to think that blocking him will make things right, instead of adressing the real issue of loopholes in the policy (and I won't even bring the issue that the entire Gdansk/Vote has been challenged many times on the basis that Chris removed some votes - which I actually agree with but is not the issue here, issue is he had no right to do so). Dozens of users have found time to bash Halibutt, but NONE of them (with the notable exception of Chris who agrees with me and so far have not joined 'hang-the-Halibutt' mob) found time to comment at my proposal for Template talk:Gdansk-Vote-Notice. Blocking Halibutt is not going to solve this issue, at best, it may end with Wikipedia loosing a valuable contributor. And if he goes, I won't be far behind. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 23:31, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Tbere is only one thing I cannot understand. What is this Halibutt's agenda you refer to? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 00:03, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Unless he is lying to me, this is not his agenda. I have talked to him about this several times, and he told me his goal is to show this voting has loopholes, which are being used by German users as well as Polish. I would agree his behaviour broke POINT, but I know he is not a petty nationalist who only wants Polish names, if you check the Gdansk/Vote, you will see he voted for Danzing for certain time periods (as well as did I). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 19:12, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

He appears to be back as User:128.2.247.100 — Knowledge Seeker দ 19:00, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hi - I wasn't suggesting LOTR-ripoff article be kept as is. If you look at this earlier version in the article history, it was originally about a (nonfiction) battle between Israeli and Palestinian forces. Why the author changed it (or whether it was just someone else using the same computer) I don't know. But the earlier version should be kept and cleaned up. -- BDAbramson ^talk 20:55, 2005 Jun 7 (UTC)

• Thanks. -- BDAbramson ^talk 21:16, 2005 Jun 7 (UTC)

I noticed your comment on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Fake Ivy. You've probably been asked before, but I'll ask it anyway: just what is the limit for sockpuppets and personal attacks? --Xcali 21:52, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Reply: Thanks. I may use that in the future. --Xcali 22:03, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

That test was about my curiosity. I was hoping noone would reprimand me for it. I value this place. Antares33712 22:28, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)