Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Hephaestos (talk | contribs) m Reverted to last edit by Evercat |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Most of it comes down to that... [[User:Evercat|Evercat]] 02:30 27 Jun 2003 (UTC) |
Most of it comes down to that... [[User:Evercat|Evercat]] 02:30 27 Jun 2003 (UTC) |
||
Thank you for your question. Please note that [[User:Evercat|Evercat]] does not speak for me. If you are a banned user, a banned unbanned user, a user who was banned then unbanned and banned then forthwith you must proceed to [[Wikipedia:Bans and blocks]]. Make sure you take your photo with you and give your work address, telephone number. Please also ensure you check this page every few minutes because these rules can change in the blink of an eye and you are required to obey all rules anybody who is a [[Wikipedia:Administrators]] wishes to think up. Too, if [[User:Jtdirl]] wishes to call you any of the following, it is okay and accepted policy of [[User:Jimbo Wales|Mr. Jimbo Wales]] the ultimate authority at this site. |
|||
*A prize asshole of the highest order |
|||
*horse manure |
|||
*crackpots |
|||
*fuckwit |
|||
*monumental asshole |
|||
amongst other good language. Too, be very careful with spelling because [[User:Jtdirl]] will be forced to fix your mistakes and he will say: ''moved to correct spelling after some idiot screwed it up''." And, if you are harassed or discriminated against you may complaion if you like but either nothing will be done of, if Mr. Wales decides, you will be banned. Good luck, glad to have you aboard our friendly community. [[User:ChuckM|ChuckM]] 02:35 27 Jun 2003 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:10, 27 June 2003
Hi. ChuckM is an advocate for banned user Joe Canuck. There is a high probability that they are actually the same person, though this hasn't quite been proven to 100% certainty. There is also a high probability that these users are both banned user DW.
ChuckM is angry with Jtdirl who was one of the people who objected most strongly to Joe Canuck's activities (mostly uploading of probably copyrighted stuff to Wikipedia, combined with a generally abusive tone, ie legalistic threats that if the images were removed, his rights were being violated, and those who did it would be "held liable", etc).
Most of it comes down to that... Evercat 02:30 27 Jun 2003 (UTC)