Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Killing sparrows (talk | contribs)
→‎List split: good job
Deryck Chan (talk | contribs)
m →‎List split: removed
Line 15: Line 15:
:Yes, it looks good. Could you also add the column headings to the various new sections?--<font color="blue" >[[User:Killing sparrows|killing sparrows]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Killing sparrows|<font color="Green" > (chirp!)</font>]]</sup> 17:38, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
:Yes, it looks good. Could you also add the column headings to the various new sections?--<font color="blue" >[[User:Killing sparrows|killing sparrows]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Killing sparrows|<font color="Green" > (chirp!)</font>]]</sup> 17:38, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
::PS Somebody mentioned above that Kashwialariski was indef blocked as a sockpuppet, this is also stated on the accounts user page. If nobody objects I will remove him/her from the list tomorrow.--<font color="blue" >[[User:Killing sparrows|killing sparrows]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Killing sparrows|<font color="Green" > (chirp!)</font>]]</sup> 17:38, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
::PS Somebody mentioned above that Kashwialariski was indef blocked as a sockpuppet, this is also stated on the accounts user page. If nobody objects I will remove him/her from the list tomorrow.--<font color="blue" >[[User:Killing sparrows|killing sparrows]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Killing sparrows|<font color="Green" > (chirp!)</font>]]</sup> 17:38, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

==Removal==
I just removed a retired adopter from the list. --[[User:Deryck Chan|Der]][[User talk:Deryck Chan|yck C.]] 07:01, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:01, 10 May 2007

Organization necessary for navigational purposes, later if not now

I think this page would be easier to navigate if it was alphabetized. I will do this unless anyone objects. Dar-Ape 23:31, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Standardization

I propose that the left column be standardized to the concise yet useful format Example User (t c). Dar-Ape 01:03, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

What can be done about a verified sockpuppet who has been blocked, but still has adopter information? I am specifically referring to User:Kashwialariski, who I stumbled upon when looking at the others who are ready to adopt. This is kind of a procedural question also.... Just wondering! - NDCompuGeek 23:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List split

I split the list into five sections. Hope it helps with the editing. --Deryck C. 11:27, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it looks good. Could you also add the column headings to the various new sections?--killing sparrows (chirp!) 17:38, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
PS Somebody mentioned above that Kashwialariski was indef blocked as a sockpuppet, this is also stated on the accounts user page. If nobody objects I will remove him/her from the list tomorrow.--killing sparrows (chirp!) 17:38, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal

I just removed a retired adopter from the list. --Deryck C. 07:01, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply