Content deleted Content added
NDCompuGeek (talk | contribs) m Sockpuppetry |
Deryck Chan (talk | contribs) List split |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
What can be done about a verified sockpuppet who has been blocked, but still has adopter information? I am specifically referring to [[User:Kashwialariski]], who I stumbled upon when looking at the others who are ready to adopt. This is kind of a procedural question also.... Just wondering! - [[User:NDCompuGeek|NDCompuGeek]] 23:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC) |
What can be done about a verified sockpuppet who has been blocked, but still has adopter information? I am specifically referring to [[User:Kashwialariski]], who I stumbled upon when looking at the others who are ready to adopt. This is kind of a procedural question also.... Just wondering! - [[User:NDCompuGeek|NDCompuGeek]] 23:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
== List split == |
|||
I split the list into five sections. Hope it helps with the editing. --[[User:Deryck Chan|Der]][[User talk:Deryck Chan|yck C.]] 11:27, 29 April 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:27, 29 April 2007
I think this page would be easier to navigate if it was alphabetized. I will do this unless anyone objects. Dar-Ape 23:31, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Standardization
I propose that the left column be standardized to the concise yet useful format Example User (t c). Dar-Ape 01:03, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry
What can be done about a verified sockpuppet who has been blocked, but still has adopter information? I am specifically referring to User:Kashwialariski, who I stumbled upon when looking at the others who are ready to adopt. This is kind of a procedural question also.... Just wondering! - NDCompuGeek 23:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
List split
I split the list into five sections. Hope it helps with the editing. --Deryck C. 11:27, 29 April 2007 (UTC)