Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Clovermoss (talk | contribs)
Clovermoss (talk | contribs)
Tag: Reply
Line 29: Line 29:


:I've thought about remaking a request here but occasionally I make page moves that benefit from a second opinion (MB fixed some a few months ago). Since I've recently been given page-mover rights, it might be worth manual review for that rare situation that I'm actually using them the way I should be (I try my best but still). However, if it'd be better for me to be on the list again, I'm fine with it. [[User:Clovermoss|<span style="color:darkorchid">Clovermoss</span><span style="color:green">🍀</span>]] [[User talk:Clovermoss|(talk)]] 17:01, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
:I've thought about remaking a request here but occasionally I make page moves that benefit from a second opinion (MB fixed some a few months ago). Since I've recently been given page-mover rights, it might be worth manual review for that rare situation that I'm actually using them the way I should be (I try my best but still). However, if it'd be better for me to be on the list again, I'm fine with it. [[User:Clovermoss|<span style="color:darkorchid">Clovermoss</span><span style="color:green">🍀</span>]] [[User talk:Clovermoss|(talk)]] 17:01, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
::{{ping|Joe Roe}} In case you wanted to comment here since you removed my autopatrolled userright. [[User:Clovermoss|<span style="color:darkorchid">Clovermoss</span><span style="color:green">🍀</span>]] [[User talk:Clovermoss|(talk)]] 17:05, 5 April 2023 (UTC)


== Removals ==
== Removals ==

Revision as of 17:05, 5 April 2023

This page is for requesting access to the redirect autopatrol pseudoright. If you wish to discuss this list, its requirements, or NPP in general, please do so at the NPP discussion page.

Guidelines

The criteria for this pseudoright is an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects.

For a request to be considered successful it must have been open for at least 24 hours with the consensus of at least 3 editors who possess the new page reviewer permission (which includes all administrators). After two weeks, if a request does not have the individual consensus of 3 reviewers the request will be automatically closed. Alternatively an administrator may close a request as successful or unsuccessful at any time as part of standard individual administrative discretion for the granting of user rights.

Closed requests will be archived to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect autopatrol list/Old requests after a minimum of three calendar days[a] following the close of the discussion.

Notes

  1. ^ Per this discussion on the user talk page of one of the New Pages Patrol coordinators.

Requests

ClydeFranklin

ClydeFranklin (t ·· del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs (block • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) Self nomination, which seems rare in these parts of town, but I have 5.2k edits and 131 mainspace redirects created, none of which have been deleted. (For the record: I couldn't find the "Add request" button mentioned in the editnotice, so if this is malformed, that's why.) {{ping|ClydeFranklin}} (t/c) 22:03, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Self noms are great and I appreciate you making one. They just don't happen much because most aren't aware of this pseudoright or don't realize how it would help patrollers. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:52, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done signed, Rosguill talk 14:51, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pyeongchang

Pyeongchang (t ·· del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs (block • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) Has created 265 live and 12 deleted redirects. The ones that were deleted were all done under G8 criteria (target no longer exists). Hey man im josh (talk) 13:25, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clovermoss

Clovermoss (t ·· del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs (block • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) Experienced NPP member with over 1.7k live redirects. They were previously removed from the redirect autopatrolled list because they had received the autopatrolled right. Since then, they requested removal of this right. Requesting that they be re-added to the list, as their redirects do not need to be manually reviewed. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:58, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've thought about remaking a request here but occasionally I make page moves that benefit from a second opinion (MB fixed some a few months ago). Since I've recently been given page-mover rights, it might be worth manual review for that rare situation that I'm actually using them the way I should be (I try my best but still). However, if it'd be better for me to be on the list again, I'm fine with it. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 17:01, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Joe Roe: In case you wanted to comment here since you removed my autopatrolled userright. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 17:05, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removals

Pjesnik21

Please remove Pjesnik21 per Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Redirect autopatrol - Administrators may "remove" users from the "group": ...at the request of the bot operator, who would be responsible for the patrols. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 04:43, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — JJMC89(T·C) 04:51, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ApprenticeFan

Please remove ApprenticeFan per Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Redirect autopatrol - Administrators may "remove" users from the "group": ...at the request of the bot operator, who would be responsible for the patrols. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 04:43, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — JJMC89(T·C) 04:51, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RandomCanadian

Please remove RandomCanadian per Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Redirect autopatrol - Administrators may "remove" users from the "group": ...at the request of the bot operator, who would be responsible for the patrols. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 04:43, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — JJMC89(T·C) 04:51, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LordHood2552

Please remove LordHood2552 per Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Redirect autopatrol - Administrators may "remove" users from the "group": ...at the request of the bot operator, who would be responsible for the patrols. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 04:43, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — JJMC89(T·C) 04:51, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Users included twice

The following users have changed their name and are included in the list with both their former and current names:

Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 20:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done signed, Rosguill talk 17:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

*Treker

*Treker is now known as StarTrekker and has the autopatrolled permission. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, removed. signed, Rosguill talk 17:55, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 23 April 2022

Please change:

<!-- DannyS712 bot III: whitelist start -->

to:

<!-- DannyS712 bot III: autopatrol list start -->

and:

<!-- DannyS712 bot III: whitelist end -->

to:

<!-- DannyS712 bot III: autopatrol list end -->

Per the closure of the requested move above, to match up with the new terminology. A pull request was opened to updated the code; pinging DannyS712. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 19:40, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do NOT do this edit request (not marking as declined because I'm not an admin so I can't really respond to it) - this should be done at the same time that the bot is updated to change the code and I might not be around for it. Its also unrelated to the requested move above. When I know I'm going to be around, we can figure out how to change this without breaking the bot in the process. DannyS712 (talk) 22:00, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, this should be coordinated carefully with bot code changes. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 22:26, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 On hold deactivated as the immediate edit is not ready, pending when DannS712 can schedule changes - at which time this can be done. — xaosflux Talk 22:31, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply