Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin
Browse history interactively
Next edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
~
 
→‎El C's neutral: new section
Line 1: Line 1:
{{RfA talk header}}
{{RfA talk header}}

== El C's neutral ==

{{moved from|[[Special:PermaLink/1112288436#Neutral]]}}
#First neutral, ever. '''Oppose''' per FASTILY (bad nom) + '''support''' per Moneytrees (good nom) = '''neutral'''. Stop protesting! [[User:El_C|El_C]] 14:18, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
#:Seems peculiar that you're neutral based on the nominators and not the candidate themselves... All power to you? [[User:That Coptic Guy|<span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(blue, purple, pink)">That Coptic Guy</span>]] 14:44, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
#::Based. Wow, that sig is overpowering. [[User:El_C|El_C]] 14:47, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
#:::<small>Helpful link: [[WP:BILLBOARD]] &mdash; <samp>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></samp> \\ 16:09, 25 September 2022 (UTC)</small>
#::Is this reading right @[[User:El C|El C]], that you are not evaluating the candidate merely his nominators? Best, [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 14:47, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
#:::No comment. [[User:El_C|El_C]] 14:50, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
#::::@[[User:El C|El C]] congrats on achieving the chaotic neutral vote 😅 I assume everyone else is either confused or playing along. ~ 🦝 [[User:Shushugah|Shushugah]]&nbsp;(he/him&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[User talk:Shushugah|talk]]) 14:56, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
#:::::Per bludgeoning. ~ 🐿️ [[User:El_C|El_C]]&nbsp;(he/him&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[User talk:El_C|talk]]) 14:59, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
#:::I think the vote rationale (and the vote in general) is just here for the sake of humor. If so, then the joke certainly flew over my head and I guess it's a me-issue. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Just a tad silly. [[User:That Coptic Guy|<span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(blue, purple, pink)">That Coptic Guy</span>]] 15:03, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
#::::Interesting take, but wrong. [[User:El_C|El_C]] 15:11, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
#:::::I'd love to be enlightened, then! [[User:That Coptic Guy|<span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(blue, purple, pink)">That Coptic Guy</span>]] 15:32, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
#::::::I'm sure you would, but not everything should be spoon-fed with neat little sugar cubes. [[User:El_C|El_C]] 15:42, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
#:::::::LOL... alright then. Whatever makes you feel better--no skin off my nose. [[User:That Coptic Guy|<span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(blue, purple, pink)">That Coptic Guy</span>]] 15:54, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
#::::::::Dude, must you? [[User:El_C|El_C]] 15:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
#:To be more direct: could you clarify your rationale, El C? On one hand, I'm not a fan of everyone jumping on opposes/neutrals; on the other, a venue that is inevitably very stressful for at least one person (and often more than one) generally isn't the best place for gleeful ambiguity. &mdash; <samp>[[User:Rhododendrites|<span style="font-size:90%;letter-spacing:1px;text-shadow:0px -1px 0px Indigo;">Rhododendrites</span>]] <sup style="font-size:80%;">[[User_talk:Rhododendrites|talk]]</sup></samp> \\ 16:08, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:13, 25 September 2022

El C's neutral

Moved from Special:PermaLink/1112288436#Neutral
  1. First neutral, ever. Oppose per FASTILY (bad nom) + support per Moneytrees (good nom) = neutral. Stop protesting! El_C 14:18, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Seems peculiar that you're neutral based on the nominators and not the candidate themselves... All power to you? That Coptic Guy 14:44, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Based. Wow, that sig is overpowering. El_C 14:47, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Helpful link: WP:BILLBOARD — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:09, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Is this reading right @El C, that you are not evaluating the candidate merely his nominators? Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 14:47, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    No comment. El_C 14:50, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @El C congrats on achieving the chaotic neutral vote 😅 I assume everyone else is either confused or playing along. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 14:56, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Per bludgeoning. ~ 🐿️ El_C (he/him • talk) 14:59, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I think the vote rationale (and the vote in general) is just here for the sake of humor. If so, then the joke certainly flew over my head and I guess it's a me-issue. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Just a tad silly. That Coptic Guy 15:03, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Interesting take, but wrong. El_C 15:11, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I'd love to be enlightened, then! That Coptic Guy 15:32, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm sure you would, but not everything should be spoon-fed with neat little sugar cubes. El_C 15:42, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    LOL... alright then. Whatever makes you feel better--no skin off my nose. That Coptic Guy 15:54, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Dude, must you? El_C 15:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    To be more direct: could you clarify your rationale, El C? On one hand, I'm not a fan of everyone jumping on opposes/neutrals; on the other, a venue that is inevitably very stressful for at least one person (and often more than one) generally isn't the best place for gleeful ambiguity. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:08, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special%3ADiff%2F1112289092

Leave a Reply