Hi SalamAlayka! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (talk page) (Contribs) Remember to notify me after replying off my talk page. 17:14, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! SalamAlayka, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 05:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. UserNumber (talk) 17:47, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 07:19, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Ibrahim Peshawari, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 08:34, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Well done writing Abu Torab Vinegarymass911 (talk) 16:01, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and Salam, SalamAlayka,

I'm the great grandson of Syed Sharfuddin Sharf Al Hussaini. First, I want to thank you from the bottom of my heart for adding such valuable informations in the article. Can you please contact me through my email address so that I can know more about my family roots? It seems like you know a lot about my family. Send me an email : hussainifaizan72@gmail.com

Thank you. Rafida03 (talk) 13:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rafida03: Actually I saw that the article needed more citations so I just did a simple Google search. A Bengali book titled মুসলিম সুধী, which is available on Google Books, contained some information which I added. SalamAlayka (talk) 14:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SalamAlayka : Firstly, I cannot find the book with the mentioned title. Can you please email me the pdf version? Addition to that did the book mentioned about Kotwal Faizuddin or the deep relation with Nawab Family with Mozzafar Hussain? Please contact me through my email if you can, would love to have a chat with you. Rafida03 (talk) 19:23, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SalamAlayka : can you please send me the full pdf of the book. I'm not being able to access it. I have mentioned my email address previously. It is a humble request to you to send the pdf. Rafida03 (talk) 21:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting keenly for your reply. @SalamAlayka Rafida03 (talk) 07:53, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rafida03:, I only have access to the preview on Google Books SalamAlayka (talk) 10:06, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit to Kasba Upazila appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Each language version of Wikipedia operates according to its own policies and guidelines, set by those who edit there, so a topic may be suitable for the Bengali Wikipedia but not the English Wikipedia, or vice versa. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the support, let me know if you require any assistance with articles too. UserNumber (talk) 18:22, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. I noticed some errors on Ajiria Madrasa article i.e. that the madrasa was founded in 1860, when actually it was before that. I noticed @Alivardi: has an article on a relative too. It might be worth mentioning also that there is a connection between the Hindu predecessors of Fulbari and Pratapgarh Kingdom. SalamAlayka (talk) 18:28, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SalamAlayka, thank you for pinging me. I wasn't actually aware of a connection between Fulbari's Hindu rulers and Pratapgarh. Could you elaborate on what you mean for me please? Thanks. Alivardi (talk) 11:55, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Alivardi: "Rulers" would not be correct here; it is probably the case that they were simply powerful landowners. Phul Mallik and Rāṇī Phulmati had a residence in the area which came to be known as Phulbāṛī. The area was later granted by the Mughals to Mir Hazara and Bolly Hazara; the ancestors of the current Chowdhury zamindars of Fulbari. The Hindu couple subsequently emigrated to the Pratapgarh Kingdom. SalamAlayka (talk) 20:49, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guess I took the "Malik" part to literally :)

That's really interesting, could you share the citation for their moving to Pratapgarh with me please? Alivardi (talk) 02:06, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Alivardi: Where's the fun in that? SalamAlayka (talk) 15:12, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Salam alayka @SalamAlayka I came across your contributions after noticing that you had correctly amended the article on the Phulbari Aziriya Madrasa, which had previously, when I last saw it, said that the madrasa was founded by Aziruddin Chowdhury in 1860. In fact, he re-endowed/re-established it. It's exciting to come across somebody who has specialist knowledge of the history of Phulbari village. I had read in a footnote somewhere that the Hindu "king" Ful Malik (more of a feudal landowner) fled to Pratapgarh - but no source was given. I was excited to read about the connection between Phulbari and Pratapgarh. Do you have any further information or sources on this? I have been researching the history of Phulbari out of personal interest so I'd be grateful to learn from you what you know of this, especially as my reading knowledge of Bengali is limited. Zindarood (talk) 21:21, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Zindarood: Thank you for reminding me about this thread. Yes, the madrasa existed before his time but was given official status in 1860 as an Alia Madrasa. I wouldn't say I have specialist knowledge on Phulbāṛī's history, though the opposite applies to Alivardi with regards to Pratāpgaṛh. My amendments came as result of finding available sources on the internet, most notably ফুলবাড়ী, ইতিহাস খ্যাত একটি গ্রাম (@Alivardi: this was the source for what I mentioned in November. I was meant to make these additions later on but seemed to forget about it. It's also a self-published source which doesn't help). Outside of available sources, I do personally know of people from Phulbāṛī although the information that I receive from them would not fall under Wikipedia's guidelines (see WP:RS). I don't see a direct connection between Phulbāṛī and Pratāpgaṛh, other than the fact that both are historical zamindaris of the erstwhile Sylhet sarkar/district. My guess would be that Phul Mallik and Rāṇī Phulmati did not get along with the Mughals (which could explain why Mir Hazara and Bolly Hazara took over) and hence migrated to nearby Pratāpgaṛh (which may not have been under direct Mughal rule at the time). SalamAlayka (talk) 13:33, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I would like to learn more of what you know about Mir Hazara and Bolly Hazara. Very little seems to be known about him. It's said that he was a descendent of Jafar ibn Abi Talib and some sources mention a father sometimes called Zoruwar Qureshi. But when did he live?

An entry in the Pakistan Dictionary of National Biography about someone from Phulbari refers to Mir Hazara as a "pensioner of the Mughal Court". But accounts I've seen chronologically place Mir Hazara  prior to Mughal control of Sylhet to not long after Shah Jalal's conuest (this assertion seems to be based, somewhat unreliably, on calculating the generations in family trees). It's also said (based on some family trees) that he married the daughter of the Amil of Sylhet, though according to one (I think inaccurate) account he married the daughter of Ful Malik. 

Is there any evidence (physical or oral) of a jagir? These things usually don't get thrown away, or are at least remembered by descendents. Grateful for any info, from you or contacts. Most of this information, even when written down in published sources, is ultimately based on local hearsay but that's still valuable to me, if not quite academically credible! Thanks again. Zindarood (talk) 02:30, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

শুভেচ্ছা নিন। বাংলাতে bn:মুহাম্মদুল্লাহ হাফেজ্জী একটি ভালো নিবন্ধ। আপনি এটাকে অনুবাদ করে ইংরেজিতে ভালো নিবন্ধ বানাতে পারেন। আমার মনে হয়, যদি ইংরেজিতে এটা ভালো নিবন্ধ হয়, এটাই হবে কোনো বাংলাদেশি ইসলামি পণ্ডিত নিয়ে ইংরেজি উইকির ১ম ভালো নিবন্ধ। - Owais ^Talk 19:20, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Owais Al Qarni: ইনশাআল্লাহ আমি করব। আপনি উনার ছবিটা কমন্স-এ রপ্তানি করুন। SalamAlayka (talk) 19:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

আমি বাংলায় এটাকে ভালো নিবন্ধ বানাতে প্রচুর কাজ করেছি। যেহেতু এসব আলেমদের নিয়ে অনলাইনে তেমন লেখা নাই, তাই অফলাইনে সংগ্রহ করতে হয়েছে। আপনি এটাকে ইংরেজিতে বানাতে পারলে বেশ ভালো হতো। আর ছবিটা কমন্সে দেওয়া যাবে না। ইংরেজিতে ফেয়ার ইউজ দিয়ে আপলোড করতে হবে। - Owais ^Talk 19:28, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Owais Al Qarni: তাইলে দয়া করে ফেয়ার ইউজ দিয়ে আপলোড করুন SalamAlayka (talk) 22:47, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. - Owais ^Talk 07:20, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ভাই, করলেন না তো। - Owais ^Talk 09:54, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Owais Al Qarni: এই নিবন্ধটি তো ইংরেজী উইকিতে আছে। কিছু বাকী আছে না কি? --SalamAlayka (talk) 14:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ভাই, ভালো নিবন্ধ বানাতে বলেছি। ইংরেজিতে যেটা আছে ওটা অসম্পূর্ণ, আনভেরিফাইড, অল্প তথ্য। আপনি লাইন বাই লাইন অনুবাদ করে এটাকে ভালো নিবন্ধ বানিয়ে দিন। আপনার অনুবাদ শেষ হলে, আমি ভালো নিবন্ধ বানিয়ে দেব। - Owais ^Talk 14:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot remove sourced content without very good cause. The article was drafted by me and you need to discuss any proposed changes at talk-page. Thanks! TrangaBellam (talk) 19:57, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing show interesting trends. At Syeda Shahar Banu, you wrote:

At the same time, she [Banu] had to work at risk, ignoring the strong constraints of the conservative society and the Indian National Congress.

Can you please quote the source, that led you to believe that INC was a "risk" to Banu. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:11, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TrangaBellam: this was a translation from an article on Bengali-language Wikipedia SalamAlayka (talk) 20:14, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not care. Translations are not an immunity against providing sources or writing NPOV content; so, please cite the source. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:40, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zobeda Khanom Chowdhury is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zobeda Khanom Chowdhury until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TrangaBellam (talk) 20:14, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:CIRCULAR. This article was plagiarized from the bn.wiki entry. Check the dates. TrangaBellam (talk) 22:35, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Harun Babunagari, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:50, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Amirganj Zamindari, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba (talk) 17:53, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jamiebuba: You can delete it, I was attempting to translate it. Wasn't ready for publishing. SalamAlayka (talk) 17:55, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well, already been moved to WP:Draftspace and the redirect will be deleted. Just incase you intend to work on it you can always head back to draft. Jamiebuba (talk) 18:00, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ভাই, এটা অনুবাদ করে দিলে খুব ভালো হতো। - Owais ^Talk 16:24, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May I know why you reverted Waliur Rahman (fellow) to a hijacked version and moved the original content to another title? The history was moved and as such, it is quite a mess.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 12:15, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vinegarymass911: It was a mistake actually. The Bengali Wikipedia linked the article to Waliur Rahman Reza politician, so I assumed they were the same people. But then I realised they weren't but the mistake could not be undone. SalamAlayka (talk) 12:41, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Waliur Rahman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waliur Rahman (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 12:22, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tafazzul Haque Habiganji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tafazzul Haque Habiganji until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 12:27, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the page to Danyal Husayn as given in the birthname. Please do not revert to a name that is against Wikipedia policies. Chaipau (talk) 14:31, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaipau: What are you talking about? It was you who added the name "Danyal Husayn" to the birth name section. It is a name that you have literally made up and not backed up with a single source. I have already told you that Wikipedia:TITLESINTITLES does not apply here as the subject is clearly best known in sources as Shahzada Danyal. Stop making issues out of nothing. @Fylindfotberserk: @Vinegarymass911: what do you think about this? SalamAlayka (talk) 14:39, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did a quick search but unable to get any google hits (book section) on "Danyal Husayn". Seems like "Shahzada Danyal" is the WP:COMMONNAME and yes WP:TITLESINTITLES should apply in this case like Mahatma Gandhi, etc. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:49, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk: most publications just use Danyal. But since Danyal is a disambiguation page, we need his last name, in this case it is either Hussain or Husayn. I agree with you that WP:TITLESINTITLES applies and we should not use Shahzada. An early iteration of this article about Danyal was deleted on the basis of notability, based on the challenge by TrangaBellam. Maybe we still have that problem. Chaipau (talk) 15:55, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SalamAlayka: the birth name given in the infobox, "Danyal bin Husayn", has been present in this page from the first version here, which is your edit. This is a name that I have not inserted here. Is this WP:OR? Chaipau (talk) 15:58, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SalamAlayka: the previous iteration of this page was Sayyid Danyal. The page was created by you, and it had the birthname "Sayyid Danyal bin Husayn" [1]. Chaipau (talk) 16:34, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Usman Bengali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Usman Bengali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TrangaBellam (talk) 17:00, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Waliur Rahman Reza, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ─ The Aafī ^(talk) 19:18, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wajihullah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wajihullah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TrangaBellam (talk) 20:16, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gunahar Zamindari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gunahar Zamindari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TrangaBellam (talk) 20:46, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zamindars of Mahipur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zamindars of Mahipur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TrangaBellam (talk) 21:12, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abu Torab is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abu Torab until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TrangaBellam (talk) 21:31, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ali Muhammad Shibli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Muhammad Shibli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TrangaBellam (talk) 06:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Shahid Rahimullah—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. TrangaBellam (talk) 06:29, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bang (progenitor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bang (progenitor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TrangaBellam (talk) 12:26, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ala Bakhsh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ala Bakhsh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TrangaBellam (talk) 12:32, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moulvi Abdul Ali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moulvi Abdul Ali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TrangaBellam (talk) 12:46, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SalamAlayka

Thank you for creating Ibrahim Ali Tashna.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 05:39, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SalamAlayka

Thank you for creating Danyal Husayn.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work. I marked it as reviewed

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SalamAlayka

Thank you for creating Danyal Husayn.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:00, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at different "Sylheti" articles (as per your contribution page), you may be blocked from editing. If you have issues, discuss in the talk page without vandalising live pages WP:CONSENSUS. Aideppp (talk) 02:32, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk: @UserNumber: @Inqilābī: Hi guys, can you look into this user and his edits on articles related to Sylheti. He sent me this message after I undid his absurd edits on Dobhashi (a Persian-influenced form of Bengali) which completely changed the structure of the article, making it about the Persian language. It seems that UserNumber also sent him a warning on his talk page which he removed. SalamAlayka (talk) 13:41, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Generally speaking, all facts stated in the article should be sourced, and unsourced things should be removed. ·~ dictátor·mundꟾ 16:47, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Khorsedur Rahman Khan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 21:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, sorry about that. Curbon7 (talk) 18:21, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SalamAlayka

Thank you for creating Mozibur Rahman.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

add this information to the constituency page too

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:48, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating the page for Md. Abdus Saleh. I'm a close relative of his and I've added further information about him to the page. I would request that you not make any more edits to the page. Regarding the name, in all official documentation, it's Md. Abdus Saleh and not Muhammad Abdus Saleh. Thank you Saaba Zareen Saleh (talk) 14:03, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Saaba Zareen Saleh: Do you know what Md. stands for? SalamAlayka (talk) 14:04, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SalamAlayka Yes, Md. stands for Muhammad. Saaba Zareen Saleh (talk) 14:13, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Saaba Zareen Saleh: Exactly, so what is the problem? I am just writing out the full form of his name. SalamAlayka (talk) 14:14, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SalamAlayka Because that is not his name. The person in question is my father. Md. Abdus Saleh is his name. That is what everyone recognizes. If it's written as Muhammad, most people do not recognize the name. Md. is used only as an honorific and is not his actual name. Saaba Zareen Saleh (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

আপনার পরবর্তী অনুবাদ তালিকায় bn:ফরীদ উদ্দীন মাসঊদ যোগ করার অনুরোধ রইল। ধন্যবাদ।–MinisterOfReligion ^(Talk) 18:23, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ভাই তুলনামূলক ছোট এই নিবন্ধগুলো অনুবাদ করতে পারেন।–MinisterOfReligion ^(Talk) 00:53, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Owais Al Qarni: ইনশাল্লাহ্ SalamAlayka (talk) 11:43, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Keramat Ali Jame Mosque has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:N. Spammy unreliable sources etc.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TrangaBellam (talk) 18:23, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Qari Najmul Hasan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qari Najmul Hasan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TrangaBellam (talk) 18:32, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As soon as I opened the discussion for the possible deletion of the article, I noticed that you have added a few sources with an immense speed. Can you please help me verify that this person is mentioned in these sources? Perhaps, a translated quote or (although these works weren't probably digitalized yet) a link would be helpful. Thank you. Ayıntaplı (talk) 20:21, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ayıntaplı: Mentioned on AfD. SalamAlayka (talk) 20:39, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SalamAlayka,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ibn Nuqtah for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hey man im josh (talk) 22:07, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than deleting this, I have moved it to Draft:Ibn Nuqtah for further improvement. Submit it for review when you believe it is ready for publication in article space. See Wikipedia:Golden rule for an overview of what is required. Also do not cite other Wikipedia articles; all cited sources must be external. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:59, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chittagonian language-এ নজর রাখার অনুরোধ করছি। এক সম্পাদক এতে মৌলিক গবেষণা যোগ করছে। আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 21:09, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prem Hari Barman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muslim League.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello dear friend User:SalamAlayka. Assalamu alaykum. I hope you are fine. As you might know, Wikipedia requires citations to reliable and authoritative third-party sources. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE, regarding verifiability and HERE, regarding the need to maintain a neutral point of view. You seem to think that I should accept your edits because of how much time it took you to make them. Sorry, ut that makes no sense. I have the right to remove what I see as masses of unverified information. You can't have large paragraphs without only a citation at the last line of each. It's your responsibility to get this right, and asking me to take it to the talk page goes against the WP:VERIFY policy, which puts the burden on YOU not to add it again without it all being referenced. It says: "Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed." It also says: "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." Best regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 02:44, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]