Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Mbecker (talk | contribs)
3,408 edits
No edit summary
RickK (talk | contribs)
36,836 edits
September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack/Back history
Line 25: Line 25:
** His additions to the September 11th pages are okay. He did, however, plagiarize a large amount of material from http://www.fas.org in another article. -- [[User:Goatasaur|goatasaur]]
** His additions to the September 11th pages are okay. He did, however, plagiarize a large amount of material from http://www.fas.org in another article. -- [[User:Goatasaur|goatasaur]]
*** Well, then you should delete it (I assume you already have, and put the reason on the talk page. This really isn't vandalism. [[User:Mbecker|MB]] 04:01 25 Jun 2003 (UTC)
*** Well, then you should delete it (I assume you already have, and put the reason on the talk page. This really isn't vandalism. [[User:Mbecker|MB]] 04:01 25 Jun 2003 (UTC)
****[[September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack/Back history]] doesn't seem particularly NPOV. [[User:RickK|RickK]] 04:09 25 Jun 2003 (UTC)


* OK, here we go again.. 24.130.213.242 is MICHAEL, see [http://www.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Contributions&target=24.130.213.242 contributions] -- [[User:Rotem Dan|Rotem Dan]] 23:13 24 Jun 2003 (UTC)
* OK, here we go again.. 24.130.213.242 is MICHAEL, see [http://www.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Contributions&target=24.130.213.242 contributions] -- [[User:Rotem Dan|Rotem Dan]] 23:13 24 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:09, 25 June 2003


The purpose of this page is to provide instant notice of vandalism taking place. You can use the format under the Current Alerts heading: IP address, pages touched, damage done. For a more comprehensive guide for dealing with different types of vandalism, see Dealing with vandalism.

For a list of currently blocked IPs and the reason why they were blocked, visit: Special:Ipblocklist.

If you would like to look up information about the vandal's IP please visit http://network-tools.com/ and enter in the IP.

However, please do not label isolated instances of text deletions, replacements or odd additions as VANDALISM unless they seem intentionally overly lewd or offensive. More often than not, this is just a visitor to the site experimenting with how to use it (also see newbie test) -- labeling them as a VANDAL is a sure way of ensuring they will not become contributors. Only add alerts to this page of true VANDALISM such as a systematic attack on several articles. Above all, please be polite at first and give the person the benefit of the doubt until they prove they deserve otherwise.

If you disagree with someone's edits, please see the following pages:

Note: Please add new alerts at the top of this list.

Current alerts

  • I am curious about the information being added to articles by 24.132.21.163. He is adding essentially the same information to several articles. His contributions are worth looking at. -- goatasaur
    • His latest contributions look fine, altough they may be inaccurate, I have no idea. MB 03:18 25 Jun 2003 (UTC)
    • His additions to the September 11th pages are okay. He did, however, plagiarize a large amount of material from http://www.fas.org in another article. -- goatasaur
  • OK, here we go again.. 24.130.213.242 is MICHAEL, see contributions -- Rotem Dan 23:13 24 Jun 2003 (UTC)
    • I have blocked that IP. FearÉIREANN 00:05 25 Jun 2003 (UTC)
  • User:Michaelism (aka Michael) is busy with edit wars, vandalism, and general abuse, for example, renaming users' home pages to User:Penis. Can someone block him, please? -- The Anome 19:26 23 Jun 2003 (UTC)
  • Levinson recursion is being used as a chat page again by Indian(?) vandals. IP bans requested.
    • Same IP addresses as last time. I have banned both ends of the conversation. Can someone tell what language they are using? -- The Anome 10:56 23 Jun 2003 (UTC)
  • 217.215.25.79 seems to be trying to use the Wikipedia to advertise an internet firewall product of no encyclopedic interest. Kat 15:51 20 Jun 2003 (UTC)
  • 205.188.209.69 seems to be Michael. Can someone look over the historical edits from this IP address and make sure he hasn't managed to slide anything in? I'd do it myself, but I'd dead tired.... --Dante Alighieri 11:04 20 Jun 2003 (UTC)
    • Articles with information, which don't seem to have been reverted: Super Bowl, Scott Reynor (Redirect to different spelling, redirect to article edited by similar, but different, IP), Jules Hardouin Mansart, Hippogriff, and a few year articles have had nl: langauge links at the top. Think everything else by that IP was reverted at some point. Looks quite possible they were edited by different people with the same IP address.
  • 24.34.38.186 is editing various things to do with Quebec, deleting huge chunks out of the articles. Adam Bishop 00:41 19 Jun 2003 (UTC)
  • 68.4.122.197 is blanking articles at random. Damage so far: 11 articles. -- Heron 20:35 18 Jun 2003 (UTC)
  • Michael seems to be back as 24.104.48.252 (interesting, by the way, that a page edited by him, Nine Inch Nails, gives some details about the psychic state of one Michael Trent Reznor whose first name has been chosen for username by our misled fried)
    • Are you sure? That's not a known IP range for him, is it? What about the edits makes you think it's Michael? --Dante Alighieri 19:19 18 Jun 2003 (UTC)
  • Ouch! Seems that 24.104.48.252 changed the date in The Downward Spiral to the correct year. Michael´s favourite pages + date changes -> suspect. In this case probably false alarm. See Avoid michaelism paranoia. Sorry. 145.254.41.254
  • 24.210.44.203 IP blocked based after this edit: "This is a test to find out if they're really so stupid as to let the general public update a web-page with any info they want.WANKERS!" -- The Anome 22:35 16 Jun 2003 (UTC)
    • I cannot see why such an edit should justify a user being blocked. The quantifier of persistent vandalism is the number of repetitive malicious edits, not the content. There have been arguably repetitive edits that are considered much more offensive but didn't get an immediate block as in this case. -- Rotem Dan 12:34 17 Jun 2003 (UTC)
    • This should probably be unblocked now, it's a day later, and this looks like drive-by vandalism.
    • Someone has unblocked 24.210.44.203 now. Thanks. The Anome 14:53 17 Jun 2003 (UTC)
  • Questionable edit or vandalism: I'm not sure what to make of this but the article Gerbil has an odd paragraph which was inserted 22:49 18 Mar 2003 by Rlandmann. His contribution list isn't short. Usedbook 14:05 15 Jun 2003 (UTC)
  • (I hope I'm doing this right) 209.130.147.214 has vandalized 3 pages, 1 of which he has vandalized twice. He seems to find it funny to repeatedly change The Wind Waker to Wanker. u_u;
  • 67.122.114.153 appears to be Michael, and has made a lot of changes that have gone unnoticed. Could someone else confirm that this is him? MB 21:34 12 Jun 2003 (UTC)
    • I can´t prove that it was him, but the pattern is highly suspicious. Reverted his contributions. Also, another anonymous user 207.103.58.54 tried to insert a false date in Van Halen (a hallmark of michaelism). Kosebamse 06:43 13 Jun 2003 (UTC)
  • Someone is editing out the duress the USA applied to Denmark to sell the Virgin Islands. I shall again try to restate it as impartially as possible. PML.
  • Spectral envelope keeps on being re-created, even though repeatedly deleted for lack of encyclopedic content. Someone appears to be using it as a "chat page"... The Anome 09:39 9 Jun 2003 (UTC)
  • 137.222.10.58 adds insulting text in articels like Bill Gates andy 16:29 5 Jun 2003 (UTC)
  • 216.20.1.214 and 216.20.1.218 created a gibberish vandal page. Keep an eye out. MB 16:08 5 Jun 2003 (UTC)
  • User:205.188.209.107 reverts to Michael's content, see contributions, the IP has a history of Michael-type edits. -- Rotem Dan 14:29 5 Jun 2003 (UTC)
    • 205.188.20*.* is Michael again. Keep a watch out on this ip range. MB 14:55 5 Jun 2003 (UTC)
    • Michael is now also editing as User:Fuck. The Anome 15:32 5 Jun 2003 (UTC)
    • And as User:Weezer/NOFX as well. andy 14:50 6 Jun 2003 (UTC)
  • In Satellite, various IPs in the 213.249.155.xxx range have been making trivial page defacements (examples: "SCHOOL IS CRAP", "I CAN SEE WHAT YOURE DOING KATIE"). Children? The Anome 10:43 5 Jun 2003 (UTC)
  • User:149.101.1.119 had been adding in dodgy and blatently POV rubbish to articles. For example, they wrote in Patrick Pearse Pearse was educated by the Christian Brothers, and it is unlikely he would have become as zealously unhinged a nationalist had he attended a non-Catholic shool. While some of their additions are OK, some beggar belief. I have had to do a couple of revertions of changes they have made, as have other Irish users. This person needs to have a very close eye kept on their work. FearÉIREANN 19:43 4 Jun 2003 (UTC)
    • I think it was just a temporary burst of enthusiasm and not understanding the concept of NPOV. I left a message on their talk page and while there still are some problems (over wrong capitalisation, etc), the POV additions have ceased. But it is still worth keeping an eye on their work, not for deliberate vandalism but for misguided changes, a couple of which I have reverted, with a message on their talk page explaining why and how their changes (probably innocently) went against naming conventions and agreed methods of working. FearÉIREANN 23:54 6 Jun 2003 (UTC)
  • User:Eddie claims he's not Michael, but systematically reverts all of Michael's clouded content. See contributions -- Rotem Dan 18:47 4 Jun 2003 (UTC)
  • Blocked 24.130.213.242, apparently another tentacle of the Michael / etc. entity. The Anome 22:44 31 May 2003 (UTC)
  • I have now unbanned a bunch of AOL proxy addresses in the 152.163.xxx.xxx range. This may let Michael/Crass/Weezer etc. back in, in which case please ban them again: you can see the list in an old revision of my talk page. The Anome 22:30 31 May 2003 (UTC)
  • User:Michael/Crass is back, again. (a) Edit comments of the form "I'm gonna rape you!!!" are abusive/threatening behavior that is grounds for banning. (b) Michael/Crass/Weezer etc. is already hard banned, and knows it. The Anome 17:07 31 May 2003 (UTC)
  • User:203.97.2.242 has flipped from making earnest contributions to vandalizing several articles related to New Zealand. -- Heron
  • OK, what are we gonna do about 205.188.xx.xx? --Dante Alighieri 21:22 28 May 2003 (UTC)
    • and now 152.163.xxx.xxx appears to be an IP-hopping persistent vandal of the Michael / Weezer variety The Anome 22:34 28 May 2003 (UTC)
    • Same person, and if you check my or John Owens user pages, he fully claims to be Michael. --Dante Alighieri 22:36 28 May 2003 (UTC)
    • The addresses used are AOL addresses in 152.163.0.0/16. AOL abuse contact phone number is +1-703-265-4670. The Anome 22:44 28 May 2003 (UTC)
    • Note that as these are probably AOL proxies, we will need to unban them in a bit, to avoid locking out lots of bona fide AOL users. The Anome
    • I agree, I think we should probably un-ban the ones I banned recently after 48 hours or so. --Dante Alighieri 22:53 28 May 2003 (UTC)
  • 204.60.89.167 is vandalizing the year articles, especially 1960 or 60 seem to be his favourite targets. Seems to have stopped for now, but needs more monitoring. andy 15:17 28 May 2003 (UTC)
  • Keep an eye out for IPs in the 200.xx.xx.xx range. Check out this and this for examples. --Dante Alighieri 00:49 28 May 2003 (UTC)
  • 138.89.183.138 is active ReversionOne 22:46 27 May 2003 (UTC) (I'll eventually get this figured out!)
  • 66.126.134.?? is running rampant and vandalising multiple pages and needs to be blocked. Lisiate 22:53 26 May 2003 (UTC)
  • User:Administration (contribs) is vandalising random articles, by replacing them with poor attempts at humour. S/he seems to be able to pump them out at an impressive rate, so I'm reverting everything on sight. -- Tim Starling 14:36 25 May 2003 (UTC)
  • 67.117.110.96 blocked by jimfbleak 10:02 24 May 2003 (UTC)
an ip user blocked an admin ??? Whaouuuuu. Nice job ! ant
  • [http://www.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Contributions&target=64.166.62.97 (www.neonet.no-ip.com vandal) blocked by The Anome 08:48 26 May 2003 (UTC)
  • "http: //www.neonet.no-ip.com" isa vandalizing lots of articles (and leaving that address everywhere he goes). Many different IPs.
    • 24.127.0.18 is vandalizing lots of articles, gotta stop him/her/it. --PY
    • 24.127.0.18: all changes reverted now. An AT&T Broadband West (registered in Chelmsford, Massachusetts) user. Went away after 20 reversions or so. -- Someone else 08:00 24 May 2003 (UTC)
    • they went away because I banned them. The Anome 08:14 24 May 2003 (UTC)
      • Figures, 24.127 was on a rampage, I was wondering why he'd stop after only 20 pages. --PY
        • Also banned 64.166.62.180, a Pacific Bell customer and 207.213.182.149, the same Pacific Bell customer using his wireless internet. -- Someone else 08:49 24 May 2003 (UTC)
        • Sheesh, wasting wireless and regular fees on this reckless activity. --PY
        • It should be noted that one of the vandals has said here "Actually this is a coordinated attack..... were just having some fun :)" Karada 09:41 24 May 2003 (UTC)
        • OK, I'm going to start banning these guys soon: they have had plenty of slack, and they know they are not meant to be doing this. The Anome 09:53 24 May 2003 (UTC)
        • Note: other vandal comments include: "It's all about dail up, changing ip -Neo." and "That y it looks like we are in more than one place or servis -Neo.". Sheesh. The Anome 09:57 24 May 2003 (UTC)
        • Can you guys ban an entire block of Ips? Maybe we should email abuse services of the ISP. --Poor Yorick
    • Grrr, how did you beat me to so many of the reverts? كسيپ Cyp 10:00 24 May 2003 (UTC)

A note: On http://www.neonet.no-ip.com/home/ the web page says "Site by Aaron Lusk". The DNS address www.neonet.no-ip.com currently resolves to 64.166.62.23. which is:

Reverse lookup: adsl-64-166-62-23.dsl.frsn01.pacbell.net. 

Pac Bell Internet Services PBI-NET-8 (NET-64-160-0-0-1) 
                                  64.160.0.0 - 64.175.255.255
FRSN01 ADSL Rback2 PPPoX SBCIS-1001030-163039 (NET-64-166-60-0-1) 
                                  64.166.60.0 - 64.166.63.255

# ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2003-05-23 20:10
# Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.

The site also features a referral E-mail address in the no-ip.com link: fel3@pacbell.net. The Anome 10:08 24 May 2003 (UTC)

The host www.neonet.no-ip.com now appears to have stopped serving web pages. The Anome 10:24 24 May 2003 (UTC)

  • 12.65.0.199: inserting nonsense with misleading edit summaries, making allusions to previous nonsense (Breanna, North Carolina and BethpageHillBrier), sharing an IP address with previous miscreants suggesting he's them. Reverting all his changes, and deleting all new pages created. -- Someone else 05:43 24 May 2003 (UTC)


  • I banned 64.12.96.9 for harassing users. Kingturtle 22:12 23 May 2003 (UTC)
  • I looked at the users contributions, and I see no example of harassing users? He obviously vandalized, but please give me examples of harassment. MB 22:23 23 May 2003 (UTC)
Fuck you...you're so fired!, you idiot, Zoe [1] Kingturtle 22:26 23 May 2003 (UTC)
See also: User talk:Michael/ban, User talk:Weezer/ban
  • 62.64.220.222 3 times erased content of 3 pages.
  • 217.118.42.2 with four instances of tagging, one of which in 1985 were he presumably wrote his own name and then deleted it... -- Egil 20:03 22 May 2003 (UTC)
  • 64.12.96.202 is back again, harassing users and partaking in pointed vandalism. I blocked the address. Kingturtle 19:42 22 May 2003 (UTC)
    • Michael's on a proxy with multiple IPs, so it'll take a lot more blocking than that to do any good, unfortunately. -- John Owens 19:46 22 May 2003 (UTC)
  • 12.65.66.157....see: [2]] Kingturtle 06:45 21 May 2003 (UTC)
    • I barely beat User:Sannse to the ban. Bob's got the dynamic IP going, though, so he may be back soon with something else in the 12.65.64.0/22 IP netblock or so soon. -- John Owens 06:52 21 May 2003 (UTC)

147.31.4.3 is deleting the content on numerous article - usually blanking the entire page. Ziggurat, etc. Rmhermen 14:45 20 May 2003 (UTC)

FIVE TIMES in fifteen minutes, Maoism has been hit by User:64.180.186.148. Please ban this jerk ASAP. --Dante Alighieri 22:55 19 May 2003 (UTC)

I'm guessing User:ElGringo is the Perth vandal again. - Hephaestos 08:04 18 May 2003 (UTC)

Three times in 8 minutes, nonsense posted to Alt.config by User:198.81.26.177 has been removed by wikipedians. Kingturtle 17:42 17 May 2003 (UTC)

User:WordMaster, User:Elegance, User:TheStick, User:CAPSMASTER, User:Haryapegirl, User:The STICK, User:Samnse. User:Suckerbot, User:AbbcMaster, User:YOU, User:WHATDOYOUTHINK?, User:MEOW, User:CAPSMASTER, seems to be the same person, frequent vandalism today, appears to be from australia (ip checks).

Not to be confused, a second cause of reverts is User:No-Fx, which seems to be an incarnation of User:Michael


--Rotem Dan 16:31 17 May 2003 (UTC)

User:WordMaster, User:Elegance, User:Suckerbot and User:TheStick seem to be the same person. At18 16:04 17 May 2003 (UTC)

User:Elegance making moronic insults on a number of user pages. Kingturtle 16:01 17 May 2003 (UTC)

User:TheStick on random articles. - Hephaestos 08:01 17 May 2003 (UTC)

  • Is this a bot, or a very tedious individiual? --Rotem Dan 08:23 17 May 2003 (UTC)
The latter I think -- sannse 08:24 17 May 2003 (UTC)
he seems like someone the Wikipedia could do without, urgently Ping 09:16 17 May 2003 (UTC)


12.64.66.15 repeatedly replacing contents of pages with unrelated text. -- Someone else 04:07 17 May 2003 (UTC)

  • I think this is the same person who created the Breanna, North Carolina article and similar text. They all come from the 12.64.* range. -- Zoe

12.239.176.188 twice blanked United States Navy. BobCMU76 22:14 16 May 2003 (UTC)

User:No-Fx is yet another incarnation of that tedious little nobody User:Michael, User:Weezer etc etc. ho hum. quercus robur 21:56 16 May 2003 (UTC), WARNING: This user is sneakingly annoying, keeps adding misleading and fallacious summaries to his edits, see [3]--Rotem Dan 22:06 16 May 2003 (UTC)

  • 147.31.4.3 is vandalizing many pages by adding bogus information - e.g. in Canadian Space Program he added a non-existing astronaut, in Bill Clinton nonsense about his impeachment. andy 14:40 16 May 2003 (UTC)
    • Note that this guy/gal has also made some decent edits as well, so please don't ban or go on a reversion spree. I notice that sie fixed hir own vandalism on vagina, which is a good sign. Martin 15:35 16 May 2003 (UTC)
      • Yes. I'll undo Brion's existing ban, and give the guy a chance. We can always ban him again if he goes silly. Keep your eyes open. Tannin 15:39 16 May 2003 (UTC)
    • Oops - my bad - I misattributed an edit on gender identity disorder to hir, when it was in fact by 162.83.146.228. Need to pay more attention to page histories... :-/ Martin 15:57 16 May 2003 (UTC)

203.108.4.70 vandalized Current events, Tollund Man, Wilfred Owen, Akhnaten, HTML, Electromagnetic spectrum, Salvinorin-A MB 02:51 16 May 2003 (UTC)

User:209.91.134.67 vandalised Royal Navy - reverted. -- Arwel 19:54 15 May 2003 (UTC)

User:192.169.41.46 vandalizes articles related to Dragon Balls. What's wrong with him. -- Taku 16:13 15 May 2003 (UTC)

User:199.248.201.253 vandalizes several pages, including Physics, Bus, Mathematics, Wikipedia:WikiMoney etc. typically replacing them with "YOU HAVE BEEN TESTPROGGED, FUCK" andy 15:12 15 May 2003 (UTC), Rotem Dan 15:21 15 May 2003 (UTC)

User:172.140.238.39 keeps re-adding commercial link(s) to several pages despite multiple reverts. See contributions. -- Minesweeper 05:56 May 12, 2003 (UTC)

On the Wikipedia:Votes for deletion page, User:12.64.66.146 said "fuckin DELETE ME AND PAY THE CONSEQUESTIONS. TESTPROG. THE WIKI WILL PAY." Kingturtle 02:47 May 11, 2003 (UTC)

In a possible related incident, User:204.39.225.151 edited Wikipedia:Votes for deletion to remove my request to delete StarProse. Kingturtle 02:51 May 11, 2003 (UTC)

User:203.59.112.73 has made a number of defacements. The Anome 14:42 May 10, 2003 (UTC)

User:JohnQ replaced Image:Wiki.png with a picture of a penis. This image was also added to Amphibology. See also his contributions list -- sannse 10:21 May 10, 2003 (UTC)

Watch out for User:81.224.187.184 [4], he tried to sneak a porn link in at health science. -- John Owens 03:20 May 8, 2003 (UTC)

User:66.129.40.177 has a short list of contributions, all of which are graffiti or vandalism. -- Heron

It isn't malicious vandalism, but it must be stopped. 217.235.14.62 did a fine job adding ISO information to existing articles, but is now creating articles with only ISO information in them. The information is really not that important to create articles with only ISO information in them. Kingturtle 03:34 May 6, 2003 (UTC)

Okay, maybe I jumped the gun a little bit. 217.235.14.62 seems to have responded to my request for him/her to only add ISO info to existing articles. But please watch. Kingturtle 03:37 May 6, 2003 (UTC)

Crumple zone contains nonsense (don't know if it's just testing or vandalism) Samw 03:18 May 6, 2003 (UTC)

please consider silencing User:Walrus for 24 hours. Each of his/her new articles have had to be deleted. Kingturtle 00:02 May 5, 2003 (UTC)

International relations theory seems to have been vandalised. Could someone revert, please - I'm not quite certain how to do this. Arno 07:26 Apr 30, 2003 (UTC)

64.12.96.12 vandalised Single-party state twice with Finally Paul Morton's weiner is huge. All the girls want to suck on it. They want him to fuck their hot pussies untiol they are tired! ÉÍREman 22:19 Apr 28, 2003 (UTC)

  • Did he provide a citation? If not, delete it and ask him to NPOV it. -º¡º
    • Don't worry I did a babbit to it and chopped it off cleanly. Maybe we should ask him for a jpeg and place it on the physical deformities page. ÉÍREman 01:34 Apr 29, 2003 (UTC)
    • Good. I'm suspicious anyway, a google search on "Paul Morton's weiner" returns zero hits. -º¡º
  • 81.135.120.16 just the usual junk entries... -- Tarquin 18:01 Apr 26, 2003 (UTC)
  • Following the deletion of the previous entry Rory Storm, 67.31.228.18 has recreated it with garbage content: does the origin of the salute have anything to do with a subordinate soldier maintaining a relatively defenseless position in the presence of a superior officer JUST IN CASE THE SUPERIOR OFFICER DEEMED IT NECESSARY TO EXECUTE THE SUBORDINATE ON THE SPOT..... this having also to do with the Romans' attempt to eliminate all left-handed babies, making all soldiers right-handed, and then forcing them to hold a right-handed salute in the presence of a superior officer until the superior officer allowed them to return to this or that non-saluting disposition -- Arwel 01:10 Apr 26, 2003 (UTC)
  • 207.28.99.82 created new entry Rory Storm with the sole content GOOD CHARLOTTE. Seems to be this address' sole entry. Looks suspicious, anyone know anything about Rory Storm? -- Arwel 20:38 Apr 25, 2003 (UTC)
He led a skiffle group in the 1960s. No relevence I can see. -- Infrogmation 01:25 Apr 26, 2003 (UTC)
I thought the name was familiar! I know "Good Charlotte" is a current popular beat combo, M'Lud, but no relation to our Rory :-). Thanks for deleting the entry again. -- Arwel 01:31 Apr 26, 2003 (UTC)
I'll work on a Rory Storm article soon. When you hear the few tracks of his band, it is quite amazing how much artistic influence they had on the beatles. Ringo was the drummer of Rory's band before switching over to the Beatles. Kingturtle 21:28 Apr 29, 2003 (UTC)
  • 63.105.22.154 has been making 3/4's nonsense changes so far. Please ban, and revert all changes to articles on which it is the last author. user_talk:hfastedge
    • Seems taken care of; still existing edits okay. -- Infrogmation 01:25 Apr 26, 2003 (UTC)

68.78.105.255 and 206.148.78.98 are apparently sharing a single brain, mostly putting wikis in articles that direct to YOUR MOTHER. -- goatasaur

  • 68.161.238.220 is blanking MASSIVE amounts of articles, mostly dealing with Laos. He needs to be quickly banned. -- goatasaur. Actually I think this user is deleting his own articles which have been ruled to be violations of copyright. Chadloder 01:08 Apr 18, 2003 (UTC)
    • He is blanking articles that many other people have worked on in conjunction with him. Wanton blanking of others' work (even in an article you have contributed to) is against the rules. -- goatasaur
      • He appears to have stopped now. The deletions have been reverted (and in some cases, rephrased to avoid any potential copyright problems) so there seems no need for further action. Tannin 01:49 Apr 18, 2003 (UTC)
  • 216.39.137.110 the noted vandal with the predeliction for the Ptolemy Dynasty and fictious Cleopatras has reappeared. Only one vandalism so far, but expect more. -- Someone else 22:41 Apr 17, 2003 (UTC)
    • I blocked that IP address right off the bat, but he's been known to use more than one, so keep an eye out regardless. -- John Owens 22:44 Apr 17, 2003 (UTC)

Minor vandalism:

  • 129.119.170.222 has been talking on some boxing pages without facts, just opinions, and has commited some vandalism, like saying that Wilfredo Gomez is arrogant, on the Salvador Sanchez page, and that Felix Trinidad is a Puerto Rican tomato can. He should be banned because his obvious hate of Puerto Ricans and love of Mexicans (for the record I like Mexicans a lot I think all Latinos are brothers and sisters) makes him have no neutral edge and he writes in an unencyclopedic way, and he conveniently erases everything that has to do with Puerto Ricans doing well or Mexicans doing bad. (When I said in the article Gomez is known among many Mexicans as The Mexican beater, which he is known as, he erased that, when I put he beat Lupe Pintor, also Mexican he erased the also Mexican part.

God knows what else he'll do against Puerto Ricans on wikipedia.

Antonio bi transvestite Martin

The last time he edited was on 7 April 2003. So I don't see any need for a ban. --mav

Note: Please add new alerts at the top of this list.

See also: User talk:Sonya L/ban, User talk:Michael/ban, user talk:Susan Mason/ban, User talk:Dietary Fiber/ban

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special%3ADiff%2F1078692

Leave a Reply