Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
SPECIFICO (talk | contribs)
Burrobert (talk | contribs)
Line 88: Line 88:


I guess most of this article was very old and not updated since, but I found it odd that there was no mention at all of the source of the leaked cables, which is of course well known by now. Could maybe use a bit more in the body of the article on Chelsea (nee Bradley) Manning and the trial and consequences of her leak. [[User:Acerimusdux|Acerimusdux]] ([[User talk:Acerimusdux|talk]]) 17:57, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
I guess most of this article was very old and not updated since, but I found it odd that there was no mention at all of the source of the leaked cables, which is of course well known by now. Could maybe use a bit more in the body of the article on Chelsea (nee Bradley) Manning and the trial and consequences of her leak. [[User:Acerimusdux|Acerimusdux]] ([[User talk:Acerimusdux|talk]]) 17:57, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

== Iraqi government reopened investigation as a result of the publication of cable ==

Any thoughts on the following text which was recently removed. It comes from a ''[[Washington Post]]'' report:
:One of the leaked documents included comments sent to the [[US State Department]] by [[Philip Alston]], [[United Nations special rapporteur|United Nations special rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary, or Arbitrary Executions]] regarding the [[Ishaqi incident]]. Alston stated that US forces handcuffed and executed the residents of a house on 15 March 2006. The residents included five children under 5 years of age. Autopsies later confirmed that "all the corpses were shot in the head and handcuffed". In September 2011, the Iraqi government reopened their investigation into the incident as a result of the publication of the cable.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Gowen |first1=Annie |title=Iraq to reopen probe of deadly 2006 raid |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle-east/iraq-to-reopen-probe-of-deadly-ishaqi-raid/2011/09/02/gIQAT0hSwJ_story.html |access-date=20 December 2021 |work=Washington Post |date=2 September 2011}}</ref>
The reason for removal consists mostly of a meaningless alphabet of letters. My view is that the text is a fair summary of the WP article and is clearly a significant episode. The release of the cable had real-world consequences as detailed in the text.
[[User:Burrobert|Burrobert]] ([[User talk:Burrobert|talk]]) 02:31, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}

Revision as of 02:31, 24 January 2022

 

Untitled

Not sure how to do this, but here's the story on how the cables got redacted. I told people how to do it. That paragraph describing it on the main page is speculative gibberish. https://web.archive.org/web/20140816145138/http://nigelparry.com/news/guardian-david-leigh-cablegate.shtml

This is good too: https://unspecified.wordpress.com/2011/09/03/wikileaks-password-leak-faq/

For the record, the latter parts of this are also speculative nonsense: http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/leak-at-wikileaks-a-dispatch-disaster-in-six-acts-a-783778.html

Here's Greenwald's article from the time correctly noting the source/process of the redaction: http://www.salon.com/2011/09/02/wikileaks_28/

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on United States diplomatic cables leak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Quotebox translation

The translation in the green quotebox is inaccurate. Any particular reason for that? ATBWikirictor (talk) 15:29, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Denn der Freitag hat eine Datei, die auch unredigierte US-Botschaftsdepeschen enthält. [...] Die Datei mit dem Namen "cables.csv" ist 1,73 Gigabyte groß. [...] Das Passwort zu dieser Datei liegt offen zutage und ist für Kenner der Materie zu identifizieren."
  • "The Freitag newspaper is in possession of a file which contains unedited US diplomatic cables. The file named "cables.csv" has a size of 1.73 GB. The file's password is plain to see and easily identifiable by the insider."

Wikirictor (talk) 12:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on United States diplomatic cables leak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:03, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chelsea Manning

I guess most of this article was very old and not updated since, but I found it odd that there was no mention at all of the source of the leaked cables, which is of course well known by now. Could maybe use a bit more in the body of the article on Chelsea (nee Bradley) Manning and the trial and consequences of her leak. Acerimusdux (talk) 17:57, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Iraqi government reopened investigation as a result of the publication of cable

Any thoughts on the following text which was recently removed. It comes from a Washington Post report:

One of the leaked documents included comments sent to the US State Department by Philip Alston, United Nations special rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary, or Arbitrary Executions regarding the Ishaqi incident. Alston stated that US forces handcuffed and executed the residents of a house on 15 March 2006. The residents included five children under 5 years of age. Autopsies later confirmed that "all the corpses were shot in the head and handcuffed". In September 2011, the Iraqi government reopened their investigation into the incident as a result of the publication of the cable.[1]

The reason for removal consists mostly of a meaningless alphabet of letters. My view is that the text is a fair summary of the WP article and is clearly a significant episode. The release of the cable had real-world consequences as detailed in the text. Burrobert (talk) 02:31, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Gowen, Annie (2 September 2011). "Iraq to reopen probe of deadly 2006 raid". Washington Post. Retrieved 20 December 2021.

Leave a Reply