Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
126.93.190.40 (talk)
No edit summary
Chelokabob (talk | contribs)
470 edits
Line 89: Line 89:
====<big>Comments by other users</big>====
====<big>Comments by other users</big>====
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small>
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small>

Someone notified me on my talk page about this [[User_talk:Chelokabob]]. As you included me in your investigation, then I should respond. I believe your investigation is related to my vote here [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Reza_Tajbakhsh_(2nd_nomination)]]. I welcome you to read all my comments that I posted and review my past edit history. I have been voting on other Iranian AFD's before. IMO, there are many that get declined who should not be declined and many editors feel that Iranian press is not reliable, many times without doing proper research. In this case I found that [[Reza_Tajbakhsh]] meets [[WP:MUSICBIO]] and posted my vote. Once you read my comments, you will see that is a valid vote based on Wikipedia Guidelines. I guarantee you that I am unrelated to the sock on that voted on page. In fact, I was afraid of this happening, but I really hate not to be able to freely vote just because someone may think I am a sock and ban my account. I welcome you to do any type of investigation and IP check. I have nothing to do with whoever that sock is.
In addition, I request that you also investigate the person posting DELETE vote from an IP, who seem to be someone with vendetta to get the page deleted, or at minimum a paid editor, just doing random edits. These are his IP addresses: 219.251.78.18 and 106.168.123.161, one is from Japan and one from Korea. [[User:Chelokabob|Chelokabob]] ([[User talk:Chelokabob|talk]]) 03:43, 16 November 2021 (UTC)


====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====

Revision as of 03:43, 16 November 2021

Hoseinkandovan

Hoseinkandovan (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

07 November 2021

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

Suspected sockpuppets


Yet another sock that edited [1] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Tajdary again. He's justing mocking around voting delete, when he desperately want the article to survive, but he definitely voted keep on other Afd discussion by copying other people's opinion. The block duration on sockmaster's should be changed to indefinite. I wouldnt be surprised if User:Chelokabob is also related. 39.121.228.67 (talk) 12:49, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Letting User:Lavalizard101 handle this stuffs. 39.121.228.67 (talk) 12:50, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Despite the fact it voted delete and is no longer using the word "valid" , the username signing behaviour of -- followed by their username is appearing again, the fact that this is the only behavioural link other than afd overlap, makes me think it could be them, either that or its someone framing them. Whatever it is, its a troll. Lavalizard101 (talk) 15:23, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Possible to Hoseinkandovan but the following are  Confirmed to each other:
  • The owner of these three accounts repeatedly tried to log in to Juror134, who is  Confirmed to
  • The following are  Likely part of the same group:
  • All of the confirmed accounts should be blocked and tagged (probably to the oldest confirmed non-"failed login" account - Juror134(?)). If the behavioural evidence supports it, then they should be tagged as suspected to Hoseinkandovan. All of these article creations need looking at with a very critical eye. Isn't UPE grand?!?-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 00:04, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Ponyo: Juror134 is blocked as a sock of ArmanAfifeh on fawiki – does the technical data fit with that? I'll block everyone except the failed login group without tags for the time being. --Blablubbs (talk) 23:30, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Quick note that I haven't blocked the likely group yet, haven't made a call there yet. --Blablubbs (talk) 23:38, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Blablubbs: I couldn't find any non-stale ArmanAfifeh accounts to check for comparison; however, looking at the CU logs I can see that TonyBallioni ran a check for ArmanAfifeh on one of the same IPV6 ranges as I found the Juror134 socks. -- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:45, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ponyo, you caught me in the first hours of being returned to life from real life business :)
Being on the same range there doesn't mean much in itself. The region/ISP is extremely dynamic and basically used by the entire country. That being said, not that many people from that region edit en.wiki, so if its a behavioural match a clerk/admin can block. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:25, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


14 November 2021

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

Suspected sockpuppets


New account created after several socks were blocked, ends up editing the AfD for Reza Tajbakash within 30 min of beginning editing. signed, Rosguill talk 20:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

15 November 2021

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets


Just like Tronjan07, all these IPs just straight went on afds and voted Keep. 1.246.105.20 (talk) 07:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Before Hoseinkandovan account has been made, Kidsonthemoon account was created in only 2 days, aside from that, it clearly has the same behavior, editing style, interest topics such as creating non-notable iranian people and voting keep at afd discussion without policy [2], just like the socks of Hoseinkandovan were doing. Meanwhile, شبنم زندگی also did the same thing [3] as Kidsonthemoon, and has the same interest of creating about iranian film as the sockmaster. Pinging User:Lavalizard101 again, as he is familiar with this guy. 1.246.105.20 (talk) 10:39, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Added 2A01:5EC0:B807:59AD:40F3:6799:1B77:3A17 and Chelokabob for collaborating as an undisclosed COI [4]. 1.246.105.20 (talk) 23:43, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Someone notified me on my talk page about this User_talk:Chelokabob. As you included me in your investigation, then I should respond. I believe your investigation is related to my vote here Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Reza_Tajbakhsh_(2nd_nomination). I welcome you to read all my comments that I posted and review my past edit history. I have been voting on other Iranian AFD's before. IMO, there are many that get declined who should not be declined and many editors feel that Iranian press is not reliable, many times without doing proper research. In this case I found that Reza_Tajbakhsh meets WP:MUSICBIO and posted my vote. Once you read my comments, you will see that is a valid vote based on Wikipedia Guidelines. I guarantee you that I am unrelated to the sock on that voted on page. In fact, I was afraid of this happening, but I really hate not to be able to freely vote just because someone may think I am a sock and ban my account. I welcome you to do any type of investigation and IP check. I have nothing to do with whoever that sock is. In addition, I request that you also investigate the person posting DELETE vote from an IP, who seem to be someone with vendetta to get the page deleted, or at minimum a paid editor, just doing random edits. These are his IP addresses: 219.251.78.18 and 106.168.123.161, one is from Japan and one from Korea. Chelokabob (talk) 03:43, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special%3ADiff%2F1055483721

Leave a Reply