This page is for requesting access to the redirect autopatrol pseudoright. If you wish to discuss this list, its requirements, or NPP in general, please do so at the NPP discussion page.

The criteria for this pseudoright is an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects.

For a request to be considered successful it must have been open for at least 24 hours with the consensus of at least 3 editors who possess the new page reviewer permission (which includes all administrators). After two weeks, if a request does not have the individual consensus of 3 reviewers the request will be automatically closed. Alternatively an administrator may close a request as successful or unsuccessful at any time as part of standard individual administrative discretion for the granting of user rights.

Closed requests will be archived to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist/Old requests after a minimum of three calendar days^[a] following the close of the discussion.

Notes

Hello, I am requesting this right as I occassionally create some redirects. I guess I am eligible for this pseudo right as I have created some redirects which are still live. I have a good knowledge about redirects. Rest assured, I won't fail you. Thankyou. _signed, Iflaq ^(talk) 02:56, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, you have a solid track record thus far, but you've only created about 30 redirects. I generally only confer this pseudoperm for editors that have created 100+ redirects. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:21, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ezlev

I've created 99 redirects so far, none of which have been deleted, and I definitely plan to create more. I often create several redirects at a time after publishing a new article. ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 18:41, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ezlev,  Done _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:54, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tamzin

Yesterday I granted Tamzin AWB rights for dealing with redirects with ʻOkinas and noticed today that they've created around 400 redirects with the only issue I found being H'w'd back in 2015. As I don't have any patrolling experience though I want someone active in the area to look it over as well. --Trialpears (talk) 08:45, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for the nomination, Trialpears. :) "Flattered" is the wrong word, but I can't think of a less-wrong one. FWIW, I was inactive when H'w'd → Hollywood was taken to RfD; if I'd been around at the time I would have made the case for it being an established (if niche) abbreviation, used by several RSes. I'm guessing people just didn't find those RSes because Google ignores apostrophes. But a search for "h'w'd" hollywood turns up quite a bit. I've thought about trying to overturn the RfD but I'm not entirely sure what the right forum would be. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 08:56, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Magnovvig

Please remove Magnovvig per Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Redirect autopatrol - Administrators may "remove" users from the "group": ...at the request of the bot operator, who would be responsible for the patrols. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 01:22, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done _signed, Rosguill ^talk 02:08, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]