Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Thanks for you review of the Red Hook Lane Arresick. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Red_Hook_Lane_Arresick

hi john, in the first, thank you for move my article. I was practicing on that. suddenlly you moved it. any way no problem, just when I serch it, I don't see it among google's content. what's your idea? P@yam (talk) 11:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi P@yam. When practicing it's best not to do it mainspace, name the article User:Payamkermanshahi/Practice 1 rather than Practice 1. As soon as the article is reviewed it should appear in the Google results. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

your statements is tru. thank you.P@yam (talk) 15:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

dear John agai Hello After several days, the article I created about Mohammad Ali Khosravi will not appear in Google search, what do you think about this? What is the reason? P@yam (talk) 02:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi P@yam, the page is still in the queue to be reviewed. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 08:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ​ Sir, Kindly review the Khazz silk. Regards RV (talk) 12:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 13:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ​ Sir. Best regards RV (talk) 01:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you turned Honolulu Wiles back into a redirect. What more must the page have to make it an article? 172.250.44.165 (talk) 18:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notability needs to be shown as per WP:NFILM. --John B123 (talk) 18:16, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've been thinking. One thing that adds notability to a film article is reception. In the case of this one, there's a reception section with one review. Isn't that enough? 172.250.44.165 (talk) 08:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From WP:NFILM: The film is widely distributed and has received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics. If you can find two full length reviews then that would be fine. --John B123 (talk) 16:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear John B123, I see that you have page mover rights, so there is one page I would like you to help me with. There is a page called the Malayan Races Liberation Army, which should be called the "Malayan National Liberation Army". Much of the early literature surrounding this army uses a mistranslation, and I believe whoever made this wiki was using some outdated sources when they choose the name. It's very frustraiting to have to explain in any wiki related to them that it was a mistranslation, and it makes it difficult when editors unfamiliar with the subject try to check the source materials. Would you change the page name from "Malayan Races Liberation Army" to "Malayan National Liberation Army"? BulgeUwU (talk) 13:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BulgeUwU, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 17:08, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thanks for your message. I am a very very new Wiki contributor. The warning about possible copyright infringement must have arisen because I based my article on some of the bios of Herr Bauni that are available online. It would help to know what are the parts of my article that "seem copied". I will make sure to rewrite the article better, in my own words. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poesía latinoamericana (talk • contribs) 20:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Poesía latinoamericana, the offending parts are highlighted in red here. Regards --John B123 (talk) 20:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Big thanks again-- and what an amazing tool is copyvios.toolforge.org ! I will improve the article accordingly. All best from snowy Germany. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poesía latinoamericana (talk • contribs) 20:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thank-you for adding the "This article needs additional citations for verification" botten, I don't know how to actually add it. But Thank-you :) Alixapixle8 (talk) 01:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alixapixle8, thanks. See Help:Referencing for beginners for information on how to add citations. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 08:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly review. And John, I jave created 36 articles so far. So what is your opinion about me applying for autopatrolled rights? Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 05:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kichu. I see Kiyan Nassiri was nominated for deletion for being promotional, and that the tag was removed by an IP from the same location as you. Whilst I don't think the article is promotional enough to be deleted, it does have some promotional elements, for example; He was able to win the I league during his debut season with the club is hardly justified as his only appearance all season was as a sub for 11 minutes.

The minimum number of articles for granting of WP:APAT is 25, so you qualify in that respect. Regards --John B123 (talk) 15:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah got the point. Will be awareful next time while dealing with football related articles. Regards Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 15:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And I have a doubt. Is there any way that I can see the list of new articles created? Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 16:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

​ see Special:NewPagesFeed. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 16:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But its showing please wait. Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 16:54, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

​ It's working ok for me. Are you on a mobile? That may be a problem as it's a very large page. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 16:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry John. Got it.. My device got messed up. Regards Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 16:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sir ​, kindly review the Draft:Sri Surasaraswathi Sabha. Thanks and regards RV (talk) 06:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RV, it would be difficult for me to review this one as I know so little of the subject. One thing that I did notice is that the infobox, which is supposed to give an "at a glance" overview of the topic, is about the current leader not the organisation. Sorry I can't be of any more help on this one. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sir ​, No issues. Is there any method of deleting own created pages/drafts ? I seriously want to know. Thanks and best regards RV (talk) 16:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

​ Providing you are the only significant contributor to the article/draft, you can tag them with {{Db-g7}}. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 16:41, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and best regards RV (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Sdkb. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on Education in Ghana, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

{{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 23:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear ​ Sir, Kindly review the Draft:Government Institute of Textile Chemistry and Knitting Technology. Thanks and best regards RV (talk) 11:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RV, all done. Regards --John B123 (talk) 17:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ​ Sir, I am obliged. Best regards RV (talk) 18:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John, I've added inline citations to Sion astronomical clock. Not sure if this is sufficient - I'll leave you to remove the unreferenced tag or not. Regards, LookLook36 (talk) 22:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LookLook36, that looks fine now so I've removed the tag. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 07:45, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear ​ Sir, Kindly review the subject. Thanks and best regards RV (talk) 13:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 13:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much and best regards RV (talk) 13:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I noticed that you tagged my article as possibly not being notable. However, I think that the school is notable because of the large amount of international coverage it received. Doesn't it meet WP:NGO because it received national coverage? Scorpions13256 (talk) 20:13, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Scorpions13256. I assume this is in connection with the very odd expulsion of the young girl. The news coverage of this seems to have fallen away already so WP:PERSISTENCE is probably applicable here. However, I don't claim to be an expert in this area so feel free to seek other opinions. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 20:42, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to write to me. I did not think that WP:PERSISTENCE applied because this is about the school and not the event itself. I also feel that it may be too soon to determine if there will not be coverage in the future. I'll do my best to find more sources. However, if this article is nominated for deletion, I am almost certain that the nomination will fail. Schools with less coverage have survived. Again, thank you for taking the time to explain your reasoning to me. I'm just a little bit crestfallen. Scorpions13256 (talk) 20:48, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

​ My thinking was that the event gave the school its notability so the guidelines for events would apply. It's perfectly ok for you to remove the tag if you disagree, the tag is more of an invitation to improve rather than a definite statement that the subject is not notable. Schools are difficult to write about as they are not inherently notable so I wouldn't feel bad about it. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 21:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I won't remove the notability tag because I feel that I need a third opinion on this. I notice that you did not mark it as reviewed, so I think it is best to wait for another reviewer to weigh in. I'll probably ask the people at WikiProject Schools too. Scorpions13256 (talk) 21:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tanks for the review. Working on it:)--APG1984 (talk) 21:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi APG1984, let me know when it's ready and I'll have another look. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 21:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much in advance for the help. I will surely do!--APG1984 (talk) 21:34, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

john Hello If you can move article to the previous location, I intend to change the title of the article.

Best wishes. P@yam (talk) 20:20, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi P@yam, I've moved the article to User:Payamkermanshahi/Practice 1. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 07:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dude, I have a doubt After linking the article with some Pages, how to remove that orphan template that you put on top of the Article! Waiting for your Reply!! ThankYour!! VelKadamban (talk) 14:16, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi VelKadamban. To remove the orphan tag, remove the {{orphan|date=February 2021}} code near the top of the page - see [1]. Regards --John B123 (talk) 14:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You For Reply!!! Can you Please say me any other Suggestion (If any) to do In Tamilism Page to Make sure its Presence in WikiPedia!! Eagerly Waiting for your Reply!!VelKadamban (talk) 14:45, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi VelKadamban. I can't see any reason why it would be removed from Wikipedia. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 14:51, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You John B123 !!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by VelKadamban (talk • contribs) 14:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

happy Valentine's! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gerda, thanks and a happy valentines to you too. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 17:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Manikya Malaraya Poovi. Please have a look at this John Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 13:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kichu, songs aren't really my strong point. I've marked it as reviewed although notability might be marginal. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 17:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Brothels in in Texas has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 17:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Bavio the Benighted (talk) 00:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello John B123. I thank you warmly and from the bottom of my heart for your participation in improving the articles I am posting on Wikipedia. Cordially. --Kalimoun (talk) 08:30, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kalimoun, thanks, and thank you for the articles you are creating. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 16:04, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ​ Sir, Kindly review the subject page. Thanks and best regards RV (talk) 12:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much and best regards RV (talk) 16:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've added more citations to the kanpei article I wrote. Can you check it again? Thanks.AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 20:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AllTheUsernamesAreInUse, it looks fine now. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 21:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	I wanted to thank you for so quickly reviewing the pages I created. Keep up the good work. Bes-ARTTalk 22:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bes-ART, thanks, and thank you for the articles you are creating. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 22:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I second this: John B123 has reviewed several articles that I've created, always quickly, always fairly. LookLook36 (talk) 00:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks LookLook36. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 09:03, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Could you please stop suggesting that darts players I have put up basic info for on here are suggestions for deletion, please? These players have participated in major tournaments in their sport and deserve to have their (in most cases, limited) profiles mentioned on here. That's Wikipedia is for, highlighting players that not many people will have heard about. Darts might not be a massive sport compared to others, but these players have earned their pages by right, and shouldn't be deleted.

If you're such a senior editor as you say you are, you should update the rules so that everyone who has appeared in a major tournament, or who has won a PDC Tour Card. It's very embarrassing that these pages keep on being deleted, when they shouldn't be.JRRobinson (talk) 16:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JRRobinson: - as far as I'm aware the only darts player article that I've nominated for deletion is Steve McNally (darts player) which I've nominated both times you recreated it. The article was previously deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve McNally (darts player) in July 2018. As far as I can tell, McNally has done nothing to show notability since then. Where there is no WP:SNG, articles must meet WP:GNG, which the McNally article has not met. If you feel there should be specific guidelines for darts players then I suggest you start a conversation at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Darts. (Courtesy ping to Discospinster as you have posted a similar message on their talk page). --John B123 (talk) 17:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, John hope you are doing well and is staying safe. I have always came to you regarding any doubts related to notability and related stuffs and you have always been a mentor. So this time my doubt is that, if a person have recieved lot of coverage from multiple sources, does that mean she/he is notable. I explain with an example. Suppose I am involved in a major controversy and some of the major national medias has covered about me in depth, does that mean I am notable. Because please see Rehana Fathima. Because its said in the article that she is a feminist and activist. But its wrong in normal sense. She was an employe in a telecom company and became famous in social media after posting her bikini photo as a protest against cyberbullying. She then also became famous after posting bare-breasted with watermelons. She is mostly famous for becoming a part of the controversy of Entry of women to Sabarimala. Other than being involved in some contreveries, the person has nothing to merit to exist as an independent article. Most of the users in the AFD are commenting as keep in the sense that the subject has recieved wide coverage from multiple sources. So I am confused about the notability in this context. If this is the case so, lot of persons exist here who have recieved coverage from multiple sources for non notable things. Waiting for your reply. Regards Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 06:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kichu, from WP:GNG: A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. This means that if a person has has significant coverage then they are viewed as notable. There are a few exceptions such as WP:BLP1E. This generally works well, but at times people who probably aren't notable pass the test and others that you would think of as notable fail. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 08:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for always helping John. Regards Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 09:27, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ​ Sir, Kindly review the subject. Thanks and regards RV (talk) 14:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:59, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and best regards RV (talk) 16:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John, Please can we talk about why the page I started - Bisi Ibidapo-Obe is tagged for deletion B.Korlah (talk) 16:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi B.Korlah. An article about Bisi Ibidapo-Obe was deleted in November 2018 for lack of notability. (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bisi Ibidapo-Obe). As far as I can see, she hasn't done anything since then to improve her notability. Regards --John B123 (talk) 16:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this... B.Korlah (talk) 16:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello John , Can you review this article ?? Please Poppified ^talk 17:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Poppified, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 18:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing the article Poppified ^talk 18:31, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ryle De Morny Hello Semikanacty,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ryle De Morny for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 16:59, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

I saw this and I wanted to inform you that I have not done such thing meaning, I have not created this page nor did I make any interaction with this page. I do no,t even remember myself creating a page I never did because I do not know how to I'm still learning from others to build a encyclopedia and ,make Wikipedia better. So I advcise that you not do this mistake again (it would be best). DO NOT BE FORWARD,DONT THINK YOU KNOW WHAT YOU DOING. Semikanacty (talk) 17:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Semikanacty: You created the page on 3 October 2020 about a "South African Television Personality, Actor and Entrepreneur" (your words) - see [2] and [3] --John B123 (talk) 18:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FUCK I DID NOT FUCKER MOTHER FUCKER SCRATCH THAT OFF BICH Semikanacty (talk) 18:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your command of the English language is impressive. --John B123 (talk) 18:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for reviewing my article and also for your great work on Wikipedia.Bestwishes-- Poppified talk 18:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Poppified, thanks - most kind of you. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 19:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I’ve got a quick question for you, you’re definitely more experienced than I am in new page patrolling so I thought I ask you, sometimes I notice you tag a page for notability concerns, my question is why not just nominate it for deletion? Is there a particular reason you do that or is it just arbitrary? I’ve been meaning to ask you this for a while. Celestina007 (talk) 23:51, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Celestina007. I don't like nominating articles for deletion unless really necessary. In some cases the subject may be notable, but this isn't apparent on the page. In other cases the article fails a WP:SNG, but with work it may pass WP:GNG. Sometimes it appears borderline on notability. Tagging with notability gives the creator the chance to bring the article up to notability requirements, but if the article hasn't been brought up to scratch after a while I'll nominate it for deletion (if somebody hasn't already done that). Of course none of this is a policy or guideline, but I've evolved this system of working after previously getting some grief from an admin over being too hasty. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 00:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation, (I’ve seen others do it not just you and it always got me puzzled) & I had been meaning to ask a more experienced reviewer than myself why that was so. Now that you have explained it to me, I definitely understand that now. Thanks once again. Celestina007 (talk) 00:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

​ No problem, glad to have been of help. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 00:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you once again. Have a great weekend. Celestina007 (talk) 01:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You had placed a notability tag on Geeta Luthra. The issue has been addressed. Can you please review the page again. Thanks Vikram 08:24, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Vikram 09:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vikram, it looks fine now. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 09:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey John could you check this article I've written? Battle of Berbera 1827, thanks! WanderingGeeljire (talk) 17:54, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WanderingGeeljire, it looks fine to me. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 17:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again you always come through :D WanderingGeeljire (talk) 17:58, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review. What categories to add? TrangaBellam (talk) 19:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TrangaBellam, I've added some categories to the article. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 20:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, John! I saw that you turned Southamerican Tour 2019 into a draft, given that it had no references, a point we absolutely agree on. I created the article on the Wikipedia in Spanish, and decided to translate it, but hadn't had the time to copy the references yet. But the original article (the English version is an... exact translation of the Spanish one, I'd say) didn't lack references, and recently I added them. Would you be so kind to restore it as an article, or should I submit it first? Thank you. --Jorge (talk) 00:48, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jorge, it looks fine now so I've moved it back to mainspace. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 00:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please take a look at (the history behind) Peter Thoeming - I don't know how to deal with it 8¬(, #copout. Perhaps needs moving to AfC? Thx.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 14:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rocknrollmancer. A bit of a tricky one. Possibly a COI, although it's not overly promotional. I don't think it's bad enough to send to AfC so I've tagged it appropriately. However, I'll keep an eye on it and if the issues aren't resolved it may have to go to AfC. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:55, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey John. Could you please review Championnat National U19? Thanks. Paul Vaurie (talk) 17:16, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paul, it looks fine to me. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 17:18, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Paul Vaurie (talk) 17:19, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

I am looking for a reviewer for these pages.

Some of these have been around for a few weeks but still haven't received a review.

If you have time, would like to seek a review on any of these pages so I can action them accordingly.

• PAG (investment firm)
• Baring Private Equity Asia
• Qiming Venture Partners
• Shenzhen Capital Group
• Algemene Pensioen Groep

Thanks! Imcdc (talk) 12:13, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]