+ Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor |
link sign up Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
To nominate or review an article, follow the [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions|instructions]]. Similarly, to '''delist''' an article which no longer meets the good article criteria, follow the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment|instructions for reassessment]]. |
To nominate or review an article, follow the [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions|instructions]]. Similarly, to '''delist''' an article which no longer meets the good article criteria, follow the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment|instructions for reassessment]]. |
||
</br> |
</br> |
||
{{ombox|text=<big>The [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/March 2021|March 2021 Good Article Nominations Backlog Elimination Drive]] will run from 00:00:01, 1 March 2021 through 23:59:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC). Sign up now!</big>}} |
{{ombox|text=<big>The [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/March 2021|March 2021 Good Article Nominations Backlog Elimination Drive]] will run from 00:00:01, 1 March 2021 through 23:59:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC). [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Good_articles/GAN_Backlog_Drives/March_2021?action=edit§ion=4 Sign up now]!</big>}} |
||
</br> |
</br> |
||
Revision as of 16:58, 16 February 2021
Main | Criteria | Instructions | Nominations | July Backlog Drive | Mentorship | Discussion | Reassessment | Report |
![Good article nominations](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8c/GA_candidate.svg/40px-GA_candidate.svg.png)
A good article nomination (GAN) is an article that is to be evaluated against the good article criteria in order to become a good article (GA). The standard of quality for good articles is less than that for featured articles. Here is the complete list of good article nominations: there are currently 617 nominations listed, of which 498 are waiting to be reviewed.
Anyone may nominate an article, and any uninvolved and registered user with sufficient knowledge and experience with Wikipedia content policies may review an article nominated at this page against the good article criteria. A responsive nominator and reviewer can complete a review in about seven days. Nominators should respond positively to constructive criticism and work with the reviewer to improve the article (if there are any issues) to good article status. If the article is promoted, a small plus sign inside a circle () will appear on the top right corner of the article's page indicating that the article is good.
To nominate or review an article, follow the instructions. Similarly, to delist an article which no longer meets the good article criteria, follow the instructions for reassessment.
![]() |
ATTENTION NEW NOMINATORS AND REVIEWERS: PLEASE READ THE INSTRUCTIONS PAGE. |
The oldest unreviewed good article nominations are:
Infant school | start review) • Murali Vijay | start review) • Barry Sheene | start review) • King Manor | start review) • Dual-threat quarterback | start review) |
The highest priority unreviewed good article nominations are:
Infant school • Barry Sheene • Dual-threat quarterback • Rikishi • Nazran okrug |
List of good articles nominations, arranged by topic Engineering and technology Geography and places History Mathematics and mathematicians Media and drama Music Natural sciences Social sciences and society |