Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin
External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

22 February 2022

17 February 2022

12 February 2022

  • curprev 06:3206:32, 12 February 2022‎ 180.150.30.218 talk‎ 15,123 bytes +84‎ added the RFC statement as-is, removing the controversial Relying party reference in favour of Certificate Evaluators which is the focus of the reference in context to the parragraph undo

11 February 2022

  • curprev 09:2609:26, 11 February 2022‎ Anton.bersh talk contribs‎ 15,039 bytes +33‎ Clarify CAA use by relying parties undo Tag: Visual edit
  • curprev 09:2109:21, 11 February 2022‎ Anton.bersh talk contribs‎ 15,006 bytes −710‎ Undid revision 1071133801 by 180.150.30.218 (talk) Undo good faith edits caused by confusion of meaning of "relying party" and "subscriber". In this context "clients" means User Agents, which are PKI relying parties. Also, recommendation for clients to use CAA sounds a lot like a guidebook suggestion, but Wikipedia is not a guidebook. undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 01:4501:45, 11 February 2022‎ 180.150.30.218 talk‎ 15,716 bytes +710‎ corrected a serious contradiction, rfc8659does not define relying party but rfc8659 links to the rfc5280 definition which is literally the opposite meaning described in this page prior to this edit undo Tag: Reverted
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS_Certification_Authority_Authorization?action=history&offset=20220228235959&limit=9

Leave a Reply