Korea NA‑class

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles NA This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/WikiProject used

Archives

Notice board Archive 1 Notice board Archive 2 Notice board Archive 3 South Korea Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Korea.

We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:

• The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
• The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
• The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).

We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Korea, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.

Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

I've created a stub for those artists, I think they are notable. Please help expand - do they have article on ko wiki? What is their Korean name spelling? Do they have a homepage? I wasn't able to find much in the English-language news. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:02, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They don't have a page/pages on the Korean wikipedia. Not sure if they have a website, though. --Christian140 (talk) 06:48, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are few things that could make it better: more photos, GPS coordinates, and address for the 1956-1976 building (seems the embassy moved in 1976, but I couldn't find out much about it). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:17, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DMZ usually today means DMZ (Korea) not a Christian pop album In ictu oculi (talk) 13:23, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is an RfC at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section‎‎ proposing to remove CJK in parentheses from the lead (as well as IPA pronunciations). Please do come participate in the discussion. Thanks! TheInfernoX (talk) 15:16, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is a request at c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright#freeuse.or.kr Korean licenses for help with interpreting a license whose text is in Korean. Can anyone from here help with this? Verbcatcher (talk) 03:30, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Unification Church in its info box says that the classification is Unification Church of the United States. I don't see how this is possible, that a larger entity is a sub-classification of a smaller entity. How about New religious movement for the category? 12.27.66.8 (talk) 19:21, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is there someone to be able to create c:File:Korea_Expressway_No.255.svg? See also c:Category:Diagrams of South Korean Expressway Sign. --ㅂㄱㅇ (talk) (Bieup Giyeok Ieung) 08:09, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Operation Rat Killer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced material

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BSOleader (talk) 17:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Operation Rat Killer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Rat Killer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BSOleader (talk) 13:34, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		Women in Red is pleased to introduce... A new initiative for worldwide online coverage: #1day1woman
		Create articles on any day of any month Cover women and their works in any field of interest Feel free to add articles in other languages, too Social media hashtag campaign: #1day1woman (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Ipigott (talk) 11:08, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone! Sorry if I'm doing this wrong. This is my first time trying to make any significant changes to a Wikipedia page. Feel free to post (or message me) any tips about how I should be doing this.

Can some folks help clean up the Korean Verbs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_verbs) page? It's inaccurate to a fairly extreme level. Things as basic as how to create the past tense and make a verb negative (I fixed the negative thing). I don't know enough about linguistics yet to correct a lot of it, but I know enough to see how bad it is. I stumbled upon the page when I was trying to find an explanation of 더냐. When I got here I saw that the explanation couldn't possibly be correct (just from my own knowledge of Korean grammar, as 더 has to do with something you directly observe and 냐 is the question form for indirect reported speech) and then saw that huge portions of the page were inaccurate.

Rayanne12 (talk) 16:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone explain me why this article is being considered for deletion? I cannot find mistakes....

SONEfr (talk) 11:51, 22 August 2017 (UTC)SONEfr[reply]

It's not because there are mistakes. Wikipedia also has notability guidelines (see WP:NTOUR). Random86 (talk) 19:51, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Participants of WikiProject Korea,

Thank you for your efforts and contribution of Wikipedia. Please refer to this Invitation to AfD and let us know your opinion for this article whether it should be "Keep", "Delete", "Merge", "Redirect", or other view Comment
on the top page of Peace Treaty with North Korea, please click the link this article's entry for your valuable opinion.

• Reference link : Wikietiquette about AfD ^[1]

Goodtiming8871 (talk) 09:44, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please can an editor familiar with Korean industry review {{Chaebol}}, especially the recent edits by a previously blocked IP? For example, Tongyang and STX are listed as defunct but their articles suggest that they are still trading. Thanks, Certes (talk) 10:12, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]