Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Renamed user 5097696514 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 223: Line 223:
* {{UserAFC|1=Luxtaythe2nd}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
* {{UserAFC|1=Luxtaythe2nd}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:I did not have the minimum editing requirement during my last request. This time, I have 600+ edits and I'm fairly confident that I can have a successful request for membership if nothing goes wrong. Please notify me if there are any issues. [[User:Luxtaythe2nd|Luxtaythe2nd]] ([[User talk:Luxtaythe2nd|talk]]) 11:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
:I did not have the minimum editing requirement during my last request. This time, I have 600+ edits and I'm fairly confident that I can have a successful request for membership if nothing goes wrong. Please notify me if there are any issues. [[User:Luxtaythe2nd|Luxtaythe2nd]] ([[User talk:Luxtaythe2nd|talk]]) 11:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

====[[User:Wikinights]]====
* {{UserAFC|1=Wikinights}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:I want to help reduce to backlog. I recently became concerned with the future of Wikipedia while reading [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2021 review/Issues]]. A competent and speedy AfC and NPP corps will encourage casual one-time article creators to become invested in the project. I am familiar with the relevant content policies and have participated in AFD, RFD, and MFD. <span style="font-weight:bold;font-family:mono">[[User:Wikinights|wikinights]]&nbsp;<sub>[[User talk:Wikinights|talk]]</sub></span> 13:27, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:27, 30 August 2021

This page is for requesting access to the AFC Helper script. If you wish to discuss this list, its requirements, or AFCH in general, please do so at the main talk page.

Requests

Note - All archived requests older than one month can be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants/Old Requests.
Please note that we generally do not notify users when their request has been reviewed, so please watch this page for updates to your request.
Please refrain from closing requests if you are not an administrator.
(add request)

July

Returning (July)

User:CodeLyoko

Returning after a long period due to some medical issues, would love to start reviewing AFC articles again! CodeLyokotalk 21:01, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
CodeLyoko, looks like you've never been removed. Primefac (talk) 13:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I guess my searching skills are terrible now I swear I did not see my name, sorry about the annoyance! CodeLyokotalk 15:55, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hah! No worries, I was processing a lot all at once so one more I-don't-actually-have-to-do-anything name isn't that big of a burden! Primefac (talk) 16:15, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sionk

I'm a returning AfC contributor, having previously become inactive when I moved on to other things. Would be interested in helping with keeping the backlog down. Would be handy to have the AfC Script back again :) Sionk (talk) 18:06, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheChunky

I believe I meet the basic requirements, as evidenced by numerous edits and several articles written that demonstrate a thorough understanding of the criteria for inclusion. I'd like to assist whenever possible. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri (Speak🗣️ or Write✍️) 02:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You're already on the list. Primefac (talk) 12:53, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New (July)

User:Lajmmoore

I like to give a bit back to Wikipedia and help with the AFC process. I've been editing for a couple of years and feel like it time for me to help out a bit more! Lajmmoore (talk) 07:52, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:GermanKity

I wanted to help Wikipedia by reviewing pending Drafts. I have also granted recently New page reviewer and Pending changes reviewer. GermanKity (talk) 16:20, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, you just started a 1-month trial run for NPP, one permission at a time please. signed, Rosguill talk 18:16, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Rosguill, I respect your decision. GermanKity (talk) 10:07, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Happily888

I have read and understand the criteria and reviewing instructions. I believe I meet all criteria as I have over 7000 edits made over three years, have created 30 articles and I have had experience with the deletion policy and understand the notability guidelines. Happily888 (talk) 05:30, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Reidgreg

To take part in the July 2021 backlog drive... and to improve the encyclopedia. Reidgreg (talk) 21:14, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:DocFreeman24

Hi! I'm interested in helping with the current backlog drive. I've been an active editor for a little over a year, have created around a dozen articles, and have familiarized myself with the AFC guidelines. Please let me know if you have any questions and thanks! DocFreeman24 (talk) 23:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chalst

Wikipedia would benefit from a smoother-functioning AfC system and that needs more editors participating, so a few months since I first thought about it, I'm putting my name forward. I meet all the criteria. I've been fairly active over the years at AfD (see my AfD stats) and DRV, and so I understand the "is it likely to survive AfD?" criterion reasonably well. — Charles Stewart (talk) 13:03, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nitesh003

I have meet the requirements. My account is more than 7 months old and I have more than 500 undeleted edits. I'm also familiar with reviewing instructions and notability guidelines. Nitesh003 (talk) 15:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now; I'm mainly concerned with the number of declined drafts and deleted pages (in particular, those for copyvio concerns or pages that were draftified). Primefac (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:TrangaBellam

Help with backlog. TrangaBellam (talk) 17:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC) TrangaBellam (talk) 17:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, concerned mostly about temperament, multiple DS alerts, and 3RR warnings. Primefac (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Re-evaluated, see my talk. Primefac (talk) 18:49, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Noobie anonymous

Note that Noobie anonymous has been blocked as a sockpuppet. KylieTastic (talk) 08:57, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrectly blocked, from the looks of it. Primefac (talk) 13:49, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not the first time that's happend :/ KylieTastic (talk) 13:52, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Correogsk

Hi! I am a Wikipedian in Spanish, English, French, and German since 2007. I think I meet the requirements. Thanks, regards! Correogsk or Gustavo (Editrocito or Heme aquí) 19:25, 12 July 2021 (UTC) Correogsk or Gustavo (talk) 19:25, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:53, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cabrils

I've been editing since 2018, I have 600+ main space edits and have created 20+ pages. I've familiarised myself with the AfC guidelines. I'm quite active on the AfDs (particularly at improving nominated pages to meet WP:GNG where possible) and would like to help out more. Thanks very much, Cabrils (talk) 23:20, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:53, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:DMySon

Though i have been contributing on Wikipedia for last two years my edit counts are 12K+. I want to help Wikipedia as an AFC reviewer. Please also check my Deletion logs. CSD Log, PROD, XFD and Draftify. DMySon (talk) 00:58, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:53, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Princess of Ara

Hello, I will particularly like to help with reviewing Nigeria-related and entertainment drafts. I've created 50+ articles including BLPs and entertainment-related articles. One of them got draftified with good reason and I've gone ahead to learn from it. I understand notability guidelines and can identify RS. My participation in AfD can be seen here (Link added to reflect my participation with my old username; User:TheSokks). I've also read and understood the reviewing instructions. For full disclosure, I engaged in sockpupptery as a novice editor, without knowing it was against the rules. I now edit only on this account after my appeal was granted to continue editing by Arbcom. My past account is Kemmiiii. I also have an active TBAN. Kind regards, Princess of Ara(talk) 19:28, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Please note that this is extremely conditional, given the past issues and/or concerns around UPE. Primefac (talk) 13:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tamingimpala

I have made more than 6000 edits, and I'm confident about my understanding of the rules and regulations of Wikipedia regarding to notability, AFD, reliable and independent sources. So far, I have created 64 articles on this wiki, and 2 of them appeared in the homepage, also I came out in the top three position at Women In Red participants list in the past two months. Prior to this one, I have applied for couple of other Wikipedia rights and have been granted so. I believe I can be an useful addition to the AFC community. If you think otherwise, please tell me what's wrong and what needs to done furthermore. Thanks. Tame (talk) 13:42, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:53, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:TipsyElephant

I've done some work with AfDs and PRODs at WP:POD, but I have not done any speedy deletions. I've mostly contributed to articles relevant to WP:POD, and I was hoping to go through the AfCs at the Wikiproject (I might branch out after that). I've made 20 different articles that have already passed AfC (i.e. Dissect (podcast) and Art Napoleon) and I've also made substantial edits to pre-existing articles such as Minjung theology and Nicholas Galanin. I just read over the guide to AfCs and I believe I meet the criteria for a reviewer. I'm not sure how relevant it is, but I've also created 10 different categories and I've uploaded or edited nearly every image used by articles at WP:POD. TipsyElephant (talk) 11:59, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, mainly on account of the number of declined drafts I'm seeing in your contributions. Yes, I do realize that there are also a number of accepted drafts, but the ratio is a bit too low for indicating a good understanding of notability. Primefac (talk) 13:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Totally fair, no hard feelings. I was actually a little worried about that. Maybe I'll apply again in like a year. Thanks for reviewing my application. TipsyElephant (talk) 16:27, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Iamfarzan

I have been editing in English wiki for the last one year. So far created 26 number of articles (Only my first article got deleted) and have good understanding about vandalism and almost every notability guidelines. I hope I can improve myself further and hope meets all the necessary requirement for the right. Iamfarzan (talk) 14:47, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:HenryCrun15

I am seeking to become a draft reviewer to help clear the backlog. In particular, there are a number of webcomic drafts that I would like to examine as part of my work on WikiProject Webcomics, but otherwise I'll be generally looking at whatever random articles catch my eye. I've been an editor since 2015 (though not always active), I've made over a thousand edits in this year alone, and I'm an active member of WikiProject Webcomics where I'm the main person who sorts through requests for new articles. HenryCrun15 (talk) 03:02, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Correogsk

Hi! I am requesting to be included here, as an Active Reviewer, since I consider I fulfill the requirements of the list. I thank a lot in advance for the opportunity!! I've just seen I was already here, twelve days ago, thanks again! Correogsk or Gustavo (Editrocito or Heme aquí) 12:09, 24 July 2021 (UTC) Correogsk or Gustavo (Editrocito or Heme aquí) 12:09, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Already done. Primefac (talk) 13:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August

Returning (August)

User:Overthrows

My username was globally renamed and removed by AfC bot with a message on my talk page citing inactivity. Prior to my rename I remained with AfC perms for about a year or two prior. Gave reviewing structures and deletion policies a read before this in case. Thanks. ‒overthrows 00:18, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New (August)

User:Sahaib3005

I requested to have AFC rights in June, but it was declined. I have created over 60 pages. Since June I have created many new articles such as John Traill, John Gray (nightwatchman) and Equestrian statue of Robert the Bruce, Bannockburn. Although a small number of the pages have been deleted, I have learned from them. I know that Wikipedia is not news, books and films with only database sources are not notable, etc.Sahaib3005 (talk) 08:12, 2 August 2021 (UTC) Sahaib3005 (talk) 08:12, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac:, I believe I must make a note here that the user hasn't read AfC guidelines properly. They inappropriately close an AfD where they've been a participant, and then accept an AfC draft improperly to a disambiguated title. The user needs to demonstrate that they understand the AfC guidelines, and imo they should be removed currently. Inappropriately closed the Miniminter AfD, inappropriately approved Draft:Miniminter to Miniminter (YouTuber). The draft has now been deleted though. ─ The Aafī (talk) 10:30, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@TheAafi:, I have reviewed a lot of AFCs (check my contributionss) amd msot of them have been uncontroversial, so I don’t think I should be removed from the afc list.

The Miniminter thing is confusing. So I created the page Zerkaa. I have improved the draft page of Miniminter (I did not create the draft). The thing is that someone created the page Miniminter despite there already being a draft. I participated in the deletion of Miniminter, as every single person voted to redirect, I decided to redirect the page. I regret redirecting the page, I thought since it was uncontroversial that it would be okay if I redirected the page even if I was involved in the discussion. Meanwhile today I spent hours improving the draft Miniminter even more. As I was an afc participant I moved the page to Miniminter (YouTuber), I couldn’t move it to Miniminter (because there was a page there). I was acting in good faith. My goal was to get rid of the poorly referenced Miniminter article and replace it with the much better draft article. I am saddened to hear that the draft article has been deleted when multiple editors have contributed to the draft. I would like to apologise for making this mess. I would also ask for the draft Miniminter to be undeleted because it was promising unlike the Miniminter page.

User:Artem.G

I'd like to participate in reviewing AfCs and I think I'm quite experienced to try it. I've created 10+ articles and reviewed 10+ GAs. Artem.G (talk) 20:08, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Peter303x

I would like to help with AFC reviews. I have done lot's of AFD and experienced editor of 8 years. Peter303x (talk) 21:55, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 13:03, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To Primefac: which particular criteria did I not meet and what do I need to do to demonstrate that I am ready before I reapply? Peter303x (talk) 00:08, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Edit count. Primefac (talk) 16:00, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:AmirahBreen

I have read and understand the criteria and reviewing instructions. I believe I meet all criteria as I have over 5000 edits made over five years, have created several articles and I have had experience with the deletion policy and understand the notability guidelines. Amirah talk 15:44, 5 August 2021 (UTC) Amirah talk 15:44, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bwmdjeff

Now that I am extended confirmed protected (>500 edits) I would like to become a reviewer here. I spent some time reviewing content policies, notability guidelines, and deletion policy. If you look through my edit history, I really do not edit anything controversial (mostly Japanese parliamentary constituencies, Japanese city districts, and creating redirect pages.
Thanks for considering me as a reviewer Bwmdjeff (talk) 20:22, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum editing requirements. Primefac (talk) 17:11, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Riteboke

I am requesting for this right to help patrol and review articles in WP:AFC. I have been editing for sometime now, i had a long break sometime ago and was editing through an IP every now and then. I would love to help review articles in draftspace, i believe i meet the criteria for this role. For now, i would appreciate if I be given on probationary basis, thanks in advance. Cheers. Riteboke (talk) 12:59, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 18:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Danre98

I'd like to help review articles submitted for creation. I have read the reviewing instructions, am familiar with relevant policies (CSD, Notability and associated guidelines, BLP, verifiability), understand deletion, and have participated at AfD some. Danre98(talk^contribs) 21:01, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lightbluerain

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights

I have a fairly good idea of what makes a Wikipedia Article acceptable. But, I don't have much experience in reviewing new pages. I go to New Pages Feed sometimes and correct as much as I can or tag with appropriate problem templates. I think being a participant here would help me with New Page reviewing with the AFC Script. I would know better of what to do other than just tagging with problems or making some of the corrections. Lightbluerain (Talk | contribs) 16:56, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 18:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vukky

I'd like to help with AfC reviews - I've seen several completely unsourced articles and such, and I want to help with keeping the backlog down. Vukky (talk 🎒 - Random text!) 07:08, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 18:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:FormalDude

I'd like to help review articles for creation because I have a good understanding of Wikipedia policy surrounding notability, reliable sources, neutral point of view, and deletion, which I believe will be beneficial in reviewing draft articles. ––𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲 talk 08:24, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 18:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:AshLin

I would like to become a draft reviewer as I feel that I should contribute in this field. I have about 30K+ edits since 2006, created over 500 articles, and participated in WP:GA in the past. I have fair understanding of Wikipedia policies including WP:NPOV, WP:RS, & WP:Notability. Do let me know if there is any other qualification that I need, I would be happy to do whatever is necessary. Thank you in advance. AshLin (talk) 13:41, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheChronium

Hello! I am doing edits for a while now and have a good understanding of Wikipedia notability guidlines and deletion policy. I am requesting to be an AFC reviewer now. So, I would be more efficient in editing Wikipedia and to help in clearling the AFC backlog. TheChronium 13:58, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:MatEditzWiki

I am seeking to help with the AFC process. It's pretty slow and some help from me would speed it up a bit when EST/PST/etc is asleep. I'm not sure if I have over 500 undeleted edits, but we'll see. MatEditzWiki (talk) 20:39, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum editing criteria. Primefac (talk) 17:13, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Capsulecap

I would like to be an AFC participant because I know how to vet articles for any unsourced, promotional, or false information and already have the know-how from making some prior pages. Helping IP/non-autoconfirmed users make articles is something that I think I'll do great at! Capsulecap (talk • contribs) 03:04, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum editing criteria. Primefac (talk) 17:13, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I guess I didn't read the fine print. I'll come back when I have 500 mainspace edits. Capsulecap (talk • contribs) 23:17, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla

I was waiting for my account to become eligible for the right. I think I meet all the basic criterias needed for this. So far Ive created 15 articles. I have reasonable knowledge about all deletion criterias. I would love to eliminate backlog.

Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 12:59, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bada Kaji

I would like to help out — I believe that I meet the requirements. Thanks. Bada Kaji (talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 11:03, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Luxtaythe2nd

I did not have the minimum editing requirement during my last request. This time, I have 600+ edits and I'm fairly confident that I can have a successful request for membership if nothing goes wrong. Please notify me if there are any issues. Luxtaythe2nd (talk) 11:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wikinights

I want to help reduce to backlog. I recently became concerned with the future of Wikipedia while reading Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2021 review/Issues. A competent and speedy AfC and NPP corps will encourage casual one-time article creators to become invested in the project. I am familiar with the relevant content policies and have participated in AFD, RFD, and MFD. wikinights talk 13:27, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply